Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Killing two birds with one stone? (Score 1) 408

If there aren't, and the US government is persistent enough, wouldn't they be able to effectively "lock out" everyone else from getting money out of the system by basically draining the exchanges dry?

I don't think it works that way. Usually it is not the exchange's task to convert bitcoin to fiat: the exchange is just a middleman that (optimally) guarantees that a transaction between two parties will go smoothly. This is mainly done by having an online 'balance' of bitcoin, same as having a balance on a bank account. The exchange company will allow to 'withdraw' your remainder if you wish, by sending you bitcoin to an address of your liking: but if you want money for bitcoin, this will be wired (or otherwise transfered) to your *bank* account, from the buyer, through the exchange.

So there is always money for bitcoin as long as there are buyers for it.

Comment Re:So what happens to the hydrogen? That's usable. (Score 1) 375

So if it actually separates the oxygen what about the hydrogen? That's fuel.

What it would separate, if it was real, would be the oxygen (gas) that is dissolved in water: not the oxygen atoms that are part of the water molecule. At least this is where gills get their oxygen from: from air dissolved in water.

Comment Re:Sounds safe (Score 1) 134

Wow. The joke was that Silk Road was compromised and user data was gathered.

What I mistakenly thought was that the joke was on cryptocurrency --hence my reaction. Now then, I apologise for my tone.

Never go full retard.

Actually it's 'never go full retard, man'. Know your memes! I believe you are not quite ready to give up your regular job and become a comedian.

By the way, thanks for collaterally pointing out to me that I can become borderline psychotic with bitcoin if I do not keep it together.

Comment Re:Sounds safe (Score 1) 134

Mentioning that as somehow relevant to a Tor hidden node being compromised leads me to believe you don't understand the topic anyway.

Nice try. Only you forgot that it was actually you who brought the cryptocurrency subject up, when you proclaimed that "you will shop at Silk Road while you wait for your download", perhaps in an attempt to be the funny guy of this hour by throwing an unspecified 'joke' in the form of general mockery against 'all things cryptoanarchy', most probably because of your personal distaste and/or fear for them.

See how simple you are to figure out?

Comment Re:Seriously? (Score 1) 216

If they can't demonstrate that they can launch a crew, convey them to their destination, and provide them with some form of functional shelter then they will never get off the ground.

How so? Who's going to stop them?

I think the real issue here is screening 1058 suicidal or terminal maniacs with a death wish out of 200k suicidal or terminal maniacs with an even greater death wish, and hope that somehow out of those a useful crew will be able to run a friggin' spaceship. To Mars. And build the foundations of a colony. On Mars.

An astronaut is usually a pilot, AND a glorified lab manager, AND an engineer, AND physically superfit, AND possesses iron willpower, and his balls are probably made of some badass titanium alloy. He/she is NOT suicidal and, though risks are understood, made a brave choice and is backed by thousands of professionals on the ground. He/she is not a telephone sanitizer backed by some soap opera script writer and his CEO.

There are many, many, many things that can go wrong here: and I am not talking technicalia, I am talking about human behaviour and attitude: people become obscene, detached, depressed, sarcastic, suicidal and even aggressive in reality shows on EARTH. And the masterminds behind this endeavour are okay in sending I-am-cool-with-it-being-a-one-way-trip reality show material to Mars?

The sad part is that I am pretty sure that it is going to actually happen, and it might end up badly not because of a hardware failure or similar, but because of human moronity: this sound more like a "put some humans in an airtight tin-can on Mars, and watch them perish on TV" (or even "better", watch them kill each other)

Comment Perhaps the reason is that: (Score 3, Interesting) 121

There spawned a couple of new exchange sites in India over the past few weeks. A few that I checked look legit, demanding some sort of official government documents for user identification, making it non-trivial for scammers to jump aboard the train. It is only natural that there is a warning, and those sites already had more or less the same warning on their frontpages. The fact that this warning is on a state level is a good think for bitcoin (and for potential traders) I think.

Submission + - China 'Flies First Stealth Drone', Japan Steps Up Defence (bbc.co.uk) 3

arisvega writes: The BBC reports that 'China successfully flew a stealth drone for the first time on Thursday, state media said, citing eyewitness reports. A drone, called "Sharp Sword" by the media, made a test flight for around 20 minutes in Chengdu, reports said. China has been developing stealth aircraft in recent years, including J-20 and J-31 stealth fighters. Following that incident, Japan said it would shoot down unmanned aircraft in Japanese airspace.'

'In September', the BBC continues, 'an unmanned drone flew close to a group of disputed islands in the East China Sea, raising tensions with Japan. China's defence ministry said that any attempt by Japan to shoot down Chinese aircraft would constitute "an act of war".'

Point is, will UAV skirmishes eventually become an intermediate --and alternative-- level of conflict, perhaps a step above cold tensions and diplomatic sanctions (since UAVs can be very well armed indeed) but surely still below a full-blown war? And would The People's Republic of China actually go to war over a dead drone?

Submission + - First Hard Evidence for the Process of Cat Domestication (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit writes: Cats have been part of human society for nearly 10,000 years, but they weren’t always string-chasers and lap-sitters. Ancient felines hunted crop-destroying rats and mice for early farmers, and in return we provided food and protection. At least that’s what scientists have long speculated. Now, they can back it up. Cat bones unearthed in a 5000-year-old Chinese farming village indicate that the animals consumed rodents and that some may have been cared for by humans. The findings provide the earliest hard evidence of this mutually beneficial relationship between man and cat.

Comment Re:Do they turn up in the downloads? (Score 3, Informative) 163

Facebook has an option to download all your data. Do these texts turn up in these downloads as well?

You know they don't. Who you search for, your browsing habits and clicks, none of that turns up either.

I do not know what purpose this 'download all your data' option serves, but it is certainly not there to give you the option to actually download all data facebook has on you: it is something ridiculous like your name, your birthday and a couple of other useless stuff. It does not even include the messages you have sent and received.

Slashdot Top Deals

IN MY OPINION anyone interested in improving himself should not rule out becoming pure energy. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.

Working...