Then they don't need to compete.

Seems pretty simple to me. Problem is, uncompetitive people don't rule the world, so you don't build a world where they control what happens.

You need to concern yourself with the "competitions" where everyone gets a trophy. Don't forget to bring the Orange slices. The little darlings need to hydrate, even though we try to keep themselves from getting too exertion.

I guess they've never watched "Snapped" . http://www.oxygen.com/snapped

My wife watches it all the time. I'm starting to get a little worried.

Dude! You've been going to the wrong dating sites again!

And women already are scientists - and engineers. I've worked with a dozen or more - I wasn't keeping count though.

Perhaps they would be a good place to start when trying to get more women involved in STEM careers.

And that is the strangest thing, we don't seem to hear much about women who are already in STEM, only how men are keeping them out of STEM.

Want a role model for women in STEM? Ty Hedy Lamarr http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

Here is the co-inventor of spread spectrum radio and a few other things, extremely intelligent, and if it important to anyone, stunningly beautiful.

But there are obviously many more. Why don't we hear more about them?

STEM, especially for the Scientists and engineers is not a career for the easily dissuaded. You are studying while the MBA and liberal arts students are partying - that's not hype.

And to claim that some woman has been so negatively affected by a photo of a playboy model's face, or a sophmoric joke about a dongle that it causes rejection as a career is as sensible as saying looking at a Barbie doll caused a girl to become bulemic. A scientist would tell you that the eating problem already existed, and at worst, the Barbie Doll, was merely a fixation.

In the end, the women in STEM movement does women a terrible disservice, painting them as weak creatures, all too easily dissuaded from careers that they would otherwise excel in, just by sexual references or distractions.

And yet here is why I tend to suspect projection:

http://www.ranker.com/list/top...

I also had a few friends in high school who were pretty brutal to gay guys. Now? Both openly gay, and one is a transgender. You can call my experince anecdotal, but it's a smoke/fire situation as far as I'm concerned.

Because not everyone is a Republican.

They don't have to marry anyone they don't want to.

Because of insurance for families, because of inheritance aspects, becvause of divorce, Next of kin, legal documents Lot's of legal reasons.

Oh yeah - that stuff's great with a little Thousand Island dressing.

And no doubt. I was excommunicated by the holy chuch of "Let's fuck Little Boys" because my fiance' wouldn't sign a freaking document declaring we would raise out children Catholic. (she was Lutheran)

Thank goodness I was forcibly excommunicated. To be voluntarily associated with that bunch of pedophiles wold be shameful to me.

It is what undid the gayhate movement. Instead of using the ever dubious moral aspect, the fight was lost over the equal protections under the law aspect. For same sex couples to be denied the rights and obligations of heterosexuals in marriage was found to be unconstitutional.

And the seal was that marriage is quite codified in the legal system. As such it is a civil, not a religious matter. Churches perform weddings, they do not perform marriages. The marriage part of the wedding is not definable by religion, as that would mean that any marriage performed outside of a church would be considered invalid (as the catholic church does - without legal standing,

tl; dr version. Fundamentalist Christians did not invent marriage, so they cannot define it.

No, it can't. I have no idea why gay bashers keep bringing bestiality up.

Oh wait, yes I do. They are projecting their wishes to fuck a goat. That's sick.

Fundies spend a lot more time thinking about gay sex than gay people do.