They did - although I have seen some Neo-Nasty stuff that used Fraktur. People make the association of that font with the Nasties.

I used to get their UN "reports" and other propaganda. I got tired of their "Eat bugs for protein" lectures.

Always the same thing.Some version of Stop eating meat, go vegan. Save the world.

The problem isn't that eating meat is killing the planet. Humans just do what humans do, just like tigers and lions do what they do, and cows gonna cow.

The problem is too damn many people trying to have a first world lifestyle while reproducing at a third world rate. And the present path doesn't elevate the third world, but turns the first world into third world.

I believe that humanity should strive to have a first world lifestyle for everyone. Not possible at present population levels. These things usually devolve into people claiming that Malthus was wrong, and will always for wrong. It is only possible for Malthus to always be wrong is the earth has infinite carrying capacity, and infinite resources.

Nature will likely take care of the population/resources issue if humanity does not.

The readability thing. I've used Helvetica just about forever, and find it much more readable than TNR. Different people, different eyes, I suppose.

As I said in another post, have they not considered Fraktur? Seems their style.

And how - I guess the only upside is this administration hasn't moved to Fraktur font.

I think it might even be more errors in Excel than 1/5th, but I'll go with your cite.

I like a nice spreadsheet - I use them for design applications in electronics. But some of the stuff I've seen bean counters and a few others always evoke the "Hold on a second, something's not right here!" response.

But many people believe that if it is in Excel, it is correct.

You mad bro? You never heard "A fool and his Money are soon parted?

I apologize profusely for introducing humor into a place with humorless people. May you always have to use software you hate.

I tried it once ugh - not ready fro prime time. One of my guys seems to love it, he must have a really low bar. I have people on Windows, Mac and Linux. And Microsoft has no solution for that. Unless things have changed a lot, Windows office doesn't do well when trading files. I remember when people were making posters in Poerpoint, the files they made were on a Windows machine, and PowerPoint assumed that was the size print to use. When we changed it to our large format printer on the Macs, it exploded, nothing was where it was supposed to be. Colors wrong, images distorted. Finding where the text disappears to was a game of "Where's Waldo"

Then there is absolutely zero problem. The falsely accused are of no importance, mere collateral damage in reshaping society.

We are blessed to see that false accusations hardly exist, and when it happens, it is inconsequential.

Except perhaps to the person whose life is destroyed.

Your post reminds me of a local Dentist who was accused of Rape of one of his patients. He was utterly destroyed. She claimed he sedated her, took her to her home and raped her.

He went on trial, and as it turned out, they were having a consensual affair. What happened was they were caught by her husband, so to avoid issues, she claimed rape. The trial was just providing proof of the ongoing affair, and how her story did not add up - like the drugs the Dentist presumably used wouldn't render her unconscious (as well is immediately waking up when her husband found them. Took only an hour, and he was found not guilty.

Meanwhile, the local womanist. crowd went haywire. They either refused to believe it, or the best one - that if they found him not guilty of rape, than the millions of women who were, would not report it. So pretty obvious that lying, destroying a man's career, and if convicted getting 25 years was of no consequence at all.

The same thing has happened to sports teams, one of my favorites was a young lady who had a three way with a couple football players, she was caught and claimed they raped her. Destroyed their lives, even after it was found that she lied. Just a blip on the radar screen of importance.

IOW false reports are irrelevant to justice.

You do know there are many other forms of employment that are not as you call them, corporate indoctrination.

I'm the CEO of a Charitable 501C3() (3) corporation that served the public good. Am I indoctrinated - you made a blanket statement.

I also work for an institution that is involved with a lot of money. I kind of assume you are extreme far left, if not, you might consider not having your posts imply that you are a Marxist/Leninist. Whatevs.

But here is the problem. There can be people who want to do social good, and don't care at all about post graduation compensation. Give them three meals and a place to sleep, they are okay. There are also people who are concerned with renumeration. I personally don't need the money I am paid now, I already have sufficient resources. But I'm not going to refuse pay. I have a skillset that is worth money. I'm just so curious how I fit into your rigid worldview. I'm the same person when I'm doing the charitable work as I am when working for money. I even use a not insignificant mouth of my money in support of that charity.

Here's the earth shattering part possibly. There is room for everyone. The altruistic self sacrificing types, and those who are not as altruistic, and might be chasing money, in many cases to support their families and insure an estate for their offspring.

I know a wide spectrum of people, there is a wide spectrum of good and evil in each group. I know some well to do corporate types who are the kindest people you'd ever meet. I know some real assholles too. On the other hand the same applies with people considered wonderful because they are helping others. Some are nice, and some hate anyone that makes more money than them, especially those indoctrinated corporate people. Assholes are everywhere.

I much prefer judging a person by the contents of their mind and their personality, rather than your presumed social position metric, where a person's goodness is inversley proportional to their paycheck. But you do you, homie.

And if you are really good at what you do, awesome - no problems. I will note that a degree isn't always the path to those extra zero's. In my own case, I didn't work in my actual field until after I retired and was offered a job I couldn't refuse.

Can you do a dissertation on how say, a Gender Studies degree is worth the same amount as say, an EE degree?

Been my experiences that the Opinion degrees tend to not be as monetarily rewarding as those that take some serious study and application. Not for nothing, not everyone has the ability to be an electrical engineer, and certainly renumeration in ones career is likewise not a universal metric. Some people do things just for the love of it.

But some degrees offer one career path - you replace the professor or instructor. So if 300 people are trying to replace just a few, the employment prospect in the field are going to leave a lot of people having to be employed elsewhere. And a few degrees are even considered a bit toxic today.

There is a point to that. It is a mix of things. Having self esteem driven into them without having any real accomplishments, being told that having a degree - any degree - made them ubermenchen. Social expectations delivered to them that they had no boundaries, and Pop culture expectations that took a few young successful people, led many to believe that was the norm, that they deserved to have a big paycheck at their introductory level job, and have a meteoric rise to leadership positions almost immediately.

As well as having a really rough time trying to understand that. I have long been on record that these young people have been really shortchanged by us, their parents. Yet if I mention anything that might be considered mild criticism, I am set upon like a wildebeest by crocodiles. Every so often you have to take a telling.

My experience is mostly with Millennials, and perhaps the latest demographic might have it worse.

But the millennials where I was came in thinking that anyone around their parents age was there to support them. They would go around barking orders to much more senior people. I watched them sort of freak out when they discovered the old dude was much more knowledgable than them.

We had things like the young lady who started playing manager with me - one of the things I did was take overload from the illustrators. She was assigning work to me. I found out she was spending the time on Facebook - back before old people took over FB.

A woman who took over 6 months time off in one year to travel, and mental health days.

A guy who started yelling at me because I pointed at his laptop screen. "Don't you EVER, EVER touch my computer!" Told him I didn't touch it. "I said DONT!" I sent him packing

The guy who ignored my phone calls, then told me he only does text messages. I told him he would answer my phone calls, or I would visit him personally, along with the Director. You don't come in and dictate the rules on your first hire.

Interesting, two of the best employees I ever worked with were millennials, They left too, but not for job problems. One wanted to get an MBA, but the Dean insisted she be full time, so she moved back with her family in a city where she could work and pursue her degree. The other was offered a masters to Doctorates free ride at another university. Point is, the basic rules haven't changed. Start your new first career job, have some humility, do really good work, and move up the ladder at a pace the ladder allows. Save money, invest wisely, live within your means, and you'll hit your goals in a more realistic time than "immediately". I didn't become so called "wealthy" until I was in my late 40's, and yes, wealth begets wealth.

I didn't make the rules.

If I were to hazard a guess, I'll note that in my place of employment for the past 30 plus years, there were groups like HR that would employ some of the more esoteric Liberal art majors, degreed people.

Today, there are perhaps more candidates than positions, and yes, some majors are considered a bit toxic.

We have created this problem by making available loans that allowed people who perhaps didn't have much business being in college to spend 4 years or more of their life living and going to school and having "the college experience", then, to borrow a phrase, having the "Surprised Pikachu Face" when reality hit that they were going to have to obtain employment and actually pay off that loan. Some have debts amounting to a modest house's value.

In reality, there is a difference between degrees that have gainful employment prospects, and those that do not. As well, I'm a little suspicious of the monovariant analysis that has been quite popular regarding employment renumeration, especially when dealing with large groups.

I thought of that, but I dump cookies on exit. So unless they've found a new place to sneak them onto my machine, that probably isn't it.

Then they are happy, and I am happy for them - they have found their solution. Ten again - If you as a business have zero options. than A Microsoft product, if the very success is predicated on Office 365, without which it all falls apart - you've created a monoculture.