Because it costs trillions of dollars to retrofit a city?
Source? Billions at worst. Like I said, this is a solved problem, and places like Amsterdam have solved this for way less than "Trillions".
How much more inefficient is it? Because on my budget smartphone I can easily last two days with heavy use. So now I will only get 1.5 days?
If you play a long AV1 wide with CPU only decoding you are more than likely to get only two HOURS instead of days.
Vastly less useful than Teslas also driverless miles driven in MANY other states and conditions than Waymo drives in.
Tesla has a far broader range of conditions to train with.
How exactly has a non-profit helped women get jobs in tech fields?
Just recently I ran into a woman having trouble finding coding work despite a solid background and resume, some people had suggested to her she try Women Who Code to get some connections that could help her find some job opportunities.
I had contributed to them in the past as they also held women only coding camps for teenagers, that is I think the key way you actually get more women into coding as opposed to simply juggling the few professional woman coders in a sightly different mix across existing companies.
I had kind of lost track of them though and hadn't contributed for a few years, I think the coding camps were shut down... maybe the organization just lost track of the core mission.
Lots of the Netherlands sits below sea level.
So why should we be concerned even slightly about cities subsiding when we already can easily deal with places that exist many meters below sea level?
Gotta tie it into global warming somehow.
This particular issue has nothing to do with it, and is at a faster rate.
Wrong. It is not the cause of Global Warming, and it is not caused by Global Warming. So far you would be right. But it is a problem whose consequences get worse due to Global Warming. So yes, it has to do with Global Warming.
In fact, the Atlas Centaur which carried Mariner 6 and 7 to Mars, weighted 136 metric tons while carrying just 400 kg of payload. At this ratio, we would need more than 300 times the payload, hence a rocket able to carry an ICBM to Mars would weigh between 6000 and 12000 metric tons or four times Saturn V.
All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin