Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment ScrumMaster, Requirements Engineer, BA (Score 1) 250

If she is still into IT, then either planning/management stuff might be interesting (BA=Business Analyst), or probably operating, second or third level support might be interesting.

I once worked for a bank in operations, very well payed, but boring as I had not much to do. That was 90% Calypso related (a trading software) and SQL on Sybase and a little bit of Solaris/Unix work.

Bottom line I was there 8h a day and worked like 1h - 2h per day, you could read books or surf the internet.

Actually a sign of a smooth running data center that the people working there spend more time reading than "working".

Comment Re:Why force her to do something she doesn't want (Score 1) 250

Last time I checked, Spain was in Europe.

Maternal leave is regulated by law.

Why the *fuck* - excuse my language - should she take less maternal leave than either is *offered* by the law or even *demanded* by the law?

Grow up, and understand that not all countries have a political "we don't care' attitude about families.

In Germany we have on top of forced maternal leave/vacation (demanded by law) an optional 12 month vacation for one parent, or of both take it, in total 14 months.

Everyone who takes that and does not take all 14 is basically dumb.

Comment Re:Nice but his arguments make not much sense (Score 1) 292

Not "except" :D
Yes they are, and in a SmartGrid they would be used for balancing the grid.

"and smart grids normally involve storage" nope, the focus right now is on activating ideling devices, like washing machines, or fridges. And the biggest game player right now is cooling houses.

This are all things that can absorb surplus power but don't give power back later.

Comment Re:Nice but his arguments make not much sense (Score 1) 292

Actually, peak solar precedes peak demand by about 2-4 hours.
Where do you live that that is the case? Peak supply is at local noon (perhaps an issue with your timezone? That local noon is 2hours before timezone 12:00?)

Speaking of which, you know what blows your whole argument out of the water? Pumped storage, which already exists around the world for evening power production, long predating renewables.
Actually it does not blow my argument out of the water. As you meanwhile wrote more or less what I wrote. Until you have so much wind and solar that your fossile plants idle, you have no use for storage.

Pumped storage is classically for balancing energy and the so called "primary reserve". Of course it can be used to store surplus solar/wind power. But that brings us back to square one: there is no nation in the world that right now has so much surplus that there is a "storage problem".

I get what you're saying. I don't see it as 'simple', I see it as 'incorrect'. I'm not sure where the breakage in your understanding is.

Neither see I yours. Why don't you make a practical example with fake numbers and show me a single hour of a day where you had surplus from wind/solar, can not power down the fossile plants, so you NEED to store it, and give me another hour of the day and explain me why at that hour you can use the stored energy. As long as your renewables produce less than "base load" you never have such a hour often enough that storage makes sense.

The goal is to EXACTLY match supply and demand. So what you can do is that when power demand is at 60% of peak(for example), you turn down the various spinning generators. But, assuming you have 'extensive' penetration by green power, and I'm talking 'eliminate all fossil fuel usage, especially coal' here, you might not have enough generators to turn down, or it might be cheaper to keep them spinning, etc... So you store the power to use later.
Yes, and exactly that your existing pumped storages do just fine, see Germany. The only thing you might need to change is the rate at which pumped storages can store or release power.

So, for example, your systems are producing 100% power during the hours of 10am to 2 pm. Demand is only 80% of peak, so you end up storing 20MWh.
Exactly! What I say since days!
So: when does such a situation arise? Obviously it can't arise when the total non dispatch able input is only 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or 50% or even 75% of peak! So until your wind and solar plants are not even able to reach the 80% that you put on the table above: no storage needed! I'm talking about NEEDED. Not about usefulness if other conditions are taken into account (like spinning generators _not_ down because it is cheaper to store the surplus and keep the generators up) however, let me state it again: there is no storage problem that desperately seeks a solution.

With EVs and Smart Grids the potential of storage goes even further down.

In other words, all thinkable problems regarding modern power production can and should first be tackled via SmartGrids, then comes long nothing, and then potentially come storages.

Comment Re:Renewable versus fossil - where is nuclear? (Score 1) 292

I'm only deeper "aware" about the german reactors, that where fueled with graphite pebbles with thorium mixed in.

They did not work out as planned at all.

Regarding the LFTR ones, China started to build some, originally they planned to go online in about 25 years. But now they proclaimed to get the online in about 10 years.

Lets see how that works ... over ten years you could install quite some wind power.

The challenges with molten salt is scaling and corrosion. It is a difference if you have a cubic yard of molten salt or 100 cubic yards. And all molten salts really like to react more or less with everything.

I wonder from what material the "reactor chamber" is made :D

Comment Re:Copyright Law (Score 1) 190

The one you are speaking about did not use the same "words" as a domain name 16 years before they got sued.
Read the summary. They blocked the domain name explicitly to sell it later ... and tried to sell it to the company which is suing now. However they could not agree on the price.

In Germany the suer likely would win ...

Comment Re:Logical Enough (Score 1) 292

Ah, the wiki. Yes. But the wiki is wrong, hence I don't read it :D The article does not even try to use the correct terms, see below, as they are used/defined in the PDF you linked.

E.g. I quote: The spinning reserve is the extra generating capacity that is available by increasing the power output of generators that are already connected to the power system. For most generators, this increase in power output is achieved by increasing the torque applied to the turbine's rotor.[3]
That is not a spinning reserve. That is a simple load following plant.
So, the primary argument that a solar/wind based grid needs more of those 'spinning reserves' can only be considered true if you had a lot of mid range load following plants running with "reserves". (You implied we would need to build new ones)
Which would contradict the fact that we already have a three phase (primary, secondary, tertiary) reserve energy supply.

The PDF explained pretty clear what kind of reserve energies exist. And the name 'reserve' has a specific meaning, it does not mean what laymen think it means. I really doubt a country as advanced as the USA still has "spinning reserves" (in the classical sense, not in the sense the wiki implies). Germany definitely has not!

No, my country doesn't require 'undisrupted power supply' because that's a standard they can't meet.
The 'undisrupted power supply' is not the point. the point is getting back to power quickly and even more important: avoiding that power disruptions happen.
In Europe this is regulated. As I said, no idea about the USA, but I would wonder if it was not.
In other words if a power company plans to feed X GW into the grid, it is required by law to "back that up" with enough reserve power (the way how to do that and which amount fitting to X, is defined in the law).

Comment Re:Nice but his arguments make not much sense (Score 1) 292

How are you defining '100% production'? Because I'd be considering demand as well. The optimal point to store is when production is high and demand is low.

This is not happening in a meaningful way. Production of solar energy is high when the demand is high.
You can try to win an argument by pointing out that on certain weekends there might be a surplus.
Nevertheless that is neglectible looking at the over all grid.
Also I really doubt that Hawaii has already enough solar installed that it is physically possible to have a surplus on a very good day. For that your energy production by solar power would beed to be close to 80% of peak demand, minimum. And you would need to have an extraordinary situation where for some strange reason energy demand drops down significantly.

My point is simple: unless you have such situations OFTEN storage is not useful. And storage is certainly not NEEDED.

4. That being said, you can avoid some of the storage issues by installing enough baseload capability, such as nuclear, to cover things like night-time use.
Or you use wind power at night. Problems solved. Facepalm, that again was so easy. Or in case of Hawaii: wave plants.

3. I'm very well aware of the difference between GW and GWh. See where I use the term 'power' for GW, and 'energy' for GWh. With renewables you want to install enough generation to cover the energy needed, and enough storage to cover not just the peak power needs, because you still need enough energy to cover the whole peak that exceeds the power coming from renewables.
This is impossible. Don't you get that? Either there is a peak and you produce more POWER than you need at that peak, or you don't. If you produce less power, you can not store anything. Simple. As long as you do not produce constantly, every day for X hours more than you need at those hours, you can not store X hours of excess energy to use it at another time!!!!!

Slashdot Top Deals

"Sometimes insanity is the only alternative" -- button at a Science Fiction convention.

Working...