I did not change the subject.
I pointed out that Telomerase only works in very few kinds of human cells.
So it is very unlikely that muscle cells or what ever cells got tested in your studies lengthen their telomeres.
It is much more likely that more stem cells are produced and help in muscle growth so that other cells dont split (and lose telomere) so that bottom line perhaps in an excercised body the average length of the telomeres is longer than in an non excercised one.
In no way does that imply or make any sense in hinting that existing cells with telomeres of length X get longer telomers by excercising (that is what you implied, and AFAIK that is impossible in a human body ... not so in Chameleons or Eals e.g. )

Next try?

The blood cell telomere length is a no brainer, as one of the three strands of human cells that can perform telomerase are bone marrow cells, which produce: ..... think think think ? ... think more ... think more ... wow: blood cells!
And an excericing persons forst body reaction is? Think ... think ... think more ... think more ... what do you think? Producing more Blood Cells! Right!

Wow, that was easy ...

So: afaWk excersising has no real effect on telomeres, not in your brain, not in your liver not in your heart or anywhere else. However your sperm quallity is increasing ... if you are into that.

Giving blood, the parents hint, does not reduce the 'toxidity' of iron.
If you suffer from to much iron in your blood you have to reduce iron intake (perhaps stopping to use subplements).

"Life without bread" has nothing to do with the topic. The parnet proclaimed living 'carb free' is 'important' ... while it is not (and actually I live on a very low carb diet, for personal reasons and not because stupid diet ideas)

There's a lot, lot, lot you don't know.
Of course there is. But not regarding nutrition ;)

Russia has not a working market nor a working society or government ...
So ofc the prices change 'randomly' or simply follow the 'hyper inflation', that has nothing to do with the fact that markets usually are not ss simple as some 'american' 3rd grade school book proclaims.
(You already pointed out the influence of currency and inflation)

Nothing about the bow, but stabelizers and aiming aids are.

Erm, you can mot read, I guess?
My statements about the USA constitution were correct, as you parent and the quote you make here clearly shows!

It had all to do what you said as answer to my comment.
The constitution (hence the name) legislates the rights of the government versus its citizens and the rights of the citizens versus the government (that is true for every constitution of the world).

And you tried to proclaim now several times that this is not the case.

In other words a law that restricts me from insulting your dead body, is not against the 'free speech artice/amendment' of your or any other constitution.

I suggest you for funk sake ask a lawyer if YOU are allowed in YOUR country to insult the corpses of the dead.

I guess I could google that for you ... but the fun talking with was over when you started insulting me and getting emotional about stuff that is simply speaking: not of your business.

Hint: in the USA every few days a white cop kills a (usually unarmed) black guy and he does not even get prodecuted (would not care if he is found 'not guilty' if they at least would prosecute him) ... there are still areas in the world where children are starving ... the USA have either not ratified or not even signed the 'international human rights bill' ... there is plenty of stuff to get upset about, but a moron who tweats about dead corpses does certainly not belong to them.

I'm not in the need to have more than a simple graps about the US constitution (and my impression is, my grasp covers more than your 'knowledge') as I'm not arguing about it.
You however are constantly arguing about a topic happening in another country which has its own constitution. Perhaps you should try to graps the legal concepts of that country a little bit instead of 'censoring' that countries 'right of free speech' to craf and apply 'its own laws'.

Regarding my nick, that is super simple ... my real name is Angelo ... that was actually easy to guess and unlike you I don't make new nicks for random topics to proclaim my idiotic self centered world views.

Mentioning the colour blue is not an attack on your dignity.
If you were a muslim, calling you a pig eater, would be.
Or as a christian calling you a satans lover or as a negro calling you a nigger ... or pissing on your grave or your corpse, or even manhandling your corpse. or as in this case talking lowly about the victims of an accident.

Your level of moral must be very low not to grasp that simple millenia old concept,

Nothing with them ... they only run faster/further without hurting their feet and the javeline is o real difference anyway.
I suggest to try modern olympic bows verus a 'real one' ... same for pistol shooting btw.

I had not. But is that relevant?
I doubt the harm increases with the amount of readers.

You are completely right. It is complete nonsense. I doubt a 'scientist' is behind it, more likely an idiotic reporter. Like the idiots who proclaim every few decades that red heads will die out because the gene is recessive.
The same logic could be applied to cows or any cattle ... poor beasts no longer hunted by predators, no longer towing wagons ... their bones must be in an utter mess!

That is nonsense. The upper edge of mankinds life span did not change at all the last 40,000 years.

What an intelligent way to interpret a post saying that offense is subjective!

So you feel that the victims got insulted/offended?

So: what is your problem? Hu? You feel neither?

Wow! For starters: the laws are not about 'feeling offended'. They are about 'objective' misspeech. Hint: most constitutions have the habit to give articles in the beginning precedense over those comming later. So if there is the question if a certain topic is either allowed under article 4 or not allowed under article 1 then article 1 usually wins.

The free speech 'amendment' in the US constitution is a _fucking_ amendment ... that litterally means: addition. In other words it was not even there in the first place, and there are plenty of 'other rules' in the USA's constitution that have a 'higher value'.

Comming now to your retarded name: all what we discuss here has nothing to do with censorship at all. Perhaps you should start reading what a 'censor' is and how 'censoring' works ... because you are insulting everyone who either sufferd during the period of WWII or during the eastern communist periods under real censorship!

My diagnostic might be errornous ... perhaps you are not an autist. Nevertheless you have serious mental problems if you prefer to take site for the culprit here (who was not even arested but seeked protection by the police, *facepalm* )

If you did not read bejond the line you quoted you did mot get my point.

The rest of your post is wrong. There was no arrest and there was no violation of free speech (because the tweat was not directed against the rulers/politicians/government but citizens ... go damn read your constitution!)

And for some reason you seem to feel offended, so read the rest of my post, you answered to.

It does not. Unlike a silenced gunshot, you hear the crossbow's bolt comming and can dodge it. Well, unless you wear mediveal helmets etc. ...