That has nothing to do with sloppyness.
If you know how to teach writing, publish a book and harvest a noble price. (Strictly speaking, that should be spelled Nobel, as that was his name).
As far as I can tell, people complain about spelling errors. But no one is able to teach how to avoid them. I'm tired about that. If I had children, the first thing I would do is bribe a doctor in attesting that they are legasthenics. So they don't have to go through the 'writing hell terror' I suffered as a young pupil.
As far as I can tell: superior reading skills cause you to make more writting errors, but perhaps that is just me.

Yes it was hard to decipher, and I also don't know/understand in what regard it should be better. I'm still on OS X 10.6 :)

What is your point?
Apple computers support multiple monitors since at least 1987.

Well, I know that, but not the 'how too do it' :),
I meam: how to make any kind of strimg from a senew. You need about two yards for a bow, lets say one and a half. A senew is hardly as long as a foot.

How, or more precisely from what material would you make a bow string?
Obviously ripping appart some silk cloth would work, but I wonder if you have an approach not relying on materials of the former civilization.

Facepalm: They posted them online, which made them readily available for legitimate copying.
In the sense that your computer needs a copy to display it, but in the sense the story is about.

Did you spell the embarrassed word three times differently for a purpose or did you only spell it two times differently?
Unfortunately my spelling correction does not trigger on your post ... and how the funk should I know what the correct spelling is when I only see english words in the internet? Half the time misspelled ...

Sigh, what is your problem?
Do you have a mental illness?
I for my part did not talk about abstraction at all, hence you have no basis to judge if I know anything about abstraction.

Have a good day (and once again I wonder why /. has no ignore feature).

In any case: I'm a requirements engineer, a software architect, a systems architect, a developer in about 20 programming languages; I do everything from training, coaching, developing, testing, analysis, design, implementation, test. I do internet applications with a few dozen of millions of users, desktop applications, embedded development in the automotive and aircraft industries. I do everything that is interesting ... do I need to continue?.

Since over 30 years. But you are the guy who sold a company for a few millions ... wow, I really wonder what I do wrong.

I for my part don't make the mistake (anymore) to accuse someone about "he does not know X" ... can be a grave mistake sometimes.

If you indeed did anything you claimed the previous posts I strongly suggest you improve your comunication skills, and for that matter: your manners.

Sorry to half insult you again: your previous five posts sound like you are a complete idiot and a superb moron.

I'm a competent architect.

That is why I work there.

Sorry I don't get your rants. You seem to have 3 bad days in a row or something. Your talking about abstractions really makes not much sense, so I pray for the entroneurs you consult, good luck.

Your first post I answered to certailny was not clear about "abstracting away persistanve issues" and your naming examples like ValidateConnection or CheckConnection are certainly bad choices as an example. On top of that that post made no contribution to the question the poster asked.

I'm a real programmer, not a manager.

Abstracting away the fact that a Service is remote and not local leads to all forms of problems. It is very often. o good idea.

I rather assume you get in lots of arguments, or you are to lazy to use the correct words/concepts to make clear about what you want to talk.

Sorry to say so, but the post I'm just answering to does not look like the person who wrote it had any clue or real life experince in software engineering at all. Is not ment as offense.

And no, I don't use that line often, actually I don't remember if I had used it already once.

Well, the application I'm working on right now mainly uses custom written persistence (MongoDB and kryo) as we have to persist millions of events per hour (worst case) and perform analysises that need response times of less than a second (usully working on a time frame, so only a relatively small amount of data has to be fetched from the backing storage).

Sorry,
you have no idea about the real world.

You connect to a DB or open a File or open a Socket and either "it just works" or you get an exception. There is no need to "validate" your connection object after you have created it, either you have it and it is "valid" or you don't have it or any subsequent method call results in an exception (which you have to handle anyway).

The title of your post is "Perhaps you should abstract your persistence mo".

After I answered to you, you suddenly talk about abstracting the business level.

So either you made a mistake in choosing the right words or headline or you simply are mixing stuff up and now try to weasel out of it ;D

Sorry, our parent had no idea what he was talking about.

I have no idea what is upsetting you so much. Had a bad day? Take a beer perhaps and a break.

Good night.

No one claimed it was not an asset, you brought up this question/merit/idea.

Well, that sounds pretty complicated.
Every projectile, flying ballistic, drops in 1 second the exact same amount.
Ofc, if it is faster it travels more distance in this second.

What about "connect(user, credential)"? That is how it works in the real world.