Take Two brought suit to "ensure that [their] trademarks are not misused."

= Take Two intend to misuse trademark laws to control discussion and criticism of their product.

Never mind 2038, it's 2048 when the Y2K bug hits us that we'll really be in trouble.

TCP/IP is a suite of protocols that includes UDP. http://www.protocols.com/pbook...

UDP isn't TCP, but UDP is one of the many protocols in the TCP/IP suite.

I expect the proprietary software wouldn't run on a netbook. Go for an actual computer, rather than a huge phone that can't make calls. Cheap notebooks cost about the same as a netbook anyway.

You didn't see the second part of the question. Yes, there are a few protocols that use Ethernet without using TCP/IP. Do any on that smaller list us IP addresses?

I can think of quite a few that use Ethernet, but I can't think of anything that uses static IP addresses that doesn't use TCP/IP, on Ethernet or otherwise.

That there may be something someone has made work in a lab doesn't mean that we should assume the most obscure and inane definitions for the task at hand.

TCP/IP is the name of the protocol suite that includes UDP. UDP is a subset of TCP/IP. TCP is a subset of TCP/IP. UDP/IP doesn't exist.

They used to be pumps, and often still are. I was told that if they are very loud, and the sound comes on and off when you activate it, then the dispensers are pumps.

IF there's no security, then just mirror port 1 on all the other ports (obviously, presuming you've plugged the 16 pumps on ports 1-16). The software "logs in" to pump 1, and pumps 2-16 think they are logged in by the same computer. That their handshake was discarded doesn't matter, if security was bad enough. Then, when you push the update to 1, 2-16 will think it's for them, and install it without issue.

I've found that reading anonymously, so you aren't logged in or posting at all, is the quickest way to get granted mod points.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

Rockets on the bottom is the right way to land a rocket.

Since you are standing on a solid ground, and not on the Earth, the north pole is on the moon?

Nope. Those "inner rings" wouldn't allow you to walk south for one mile, so they are invalid. And allowing that you start walking south, and continue "straight" regardless of whether it later becomes north, would (at a first glance) would send you too far north, so that you can't get back home. If you are exactly one mile north of the south pole, you could satisfy the conditions , if you allow spinning in place to count for "walking west" as you'll be spinning west.

So anti-competitive collusion from an oligopoly isn't a "price control"? Most people would put price fixing into "price control".

Exactly, just last week I was reading about a proposed Canadian mine that was vetoed by the native council, not due to environmental concerns, but because of uncertainty over environmental impact in the future because current and projected prices didn't actually support opening the mine in the near term but the company looking for approval was looking for a 50 year lease on the land. If Russia ties up a lot of the world supply and shuts down mines they own then the price will rise and mines like that one will come online, it's not like they're going to take over so much of the world supply that we'll be shutting down reactors due to lack of fuel. The real fear I'm sure is that Westinghouse and GE and their suppliers will have to pay more for yellowcake in order to produce their overpriced fuel rods.

I agree. It may only take a few seconds to google, but that's a few seconds unnecessarily wasted because the summary poster was too lazy to provide a definition (though to be fair, with as inaccurate as some summaries have been lately, this isn't the worst offense by far).