Comment Re:should be higher (Score 3, Insightful) 229
If you've only spent $4.50 on games, what they hell are you doing trying to get involved in mod discussions. The last thing those discussion forums need is more spammers.
If you've only spent $4.50 on games, what they hell are you doing trying to get involved in mod discussions. The last thing those discussion forums need is more spammers.
If you set the threshold that high, new users will probably be turned off by the price of entry.
It doesn't prevent them from playing their games, it just prevents them from hassling other users.
If you want to spend $4.25 on a game on Steam, you can play that game to your heart's content. You just can't start spamming other users.
So no, new users will NOT be probably turned off by the price of entry into the community, even if the threshold is $50. Personally, I think the threshold should be $25 and three months of use.
What is management of that power worth? What is spare capacity worth?
Instead of few to many, the grid has to become many to many. The equations for worth are going to become very complex.
I remember reading an article on building a cheap dipole antenna, is that still the smartest thing I can put up with minimal effort? Is it worth it to put it along the inside of my attic, or do I really need to have it outside? My home is on a rise. I have a HR2510 I scored for ten bucks and I want to see if it works. If it does, perhaps I'll learn how to use it
People with amateur licenses are helpful for some things, but they're absolutely useless for disseminating information over a wide area that's otherwise disconnected
Useless is a strong word, and "absolutely" is a strong modifier. Neither is warranted here. People with amateur licenses can put the word out manually to other people who can do the same. Meanwhile, those people are likely to have disconnected power sources, while many radio stations are in urban areas and are legally prohibited from having inexpensive, functional backup power.
Jokes aside, most of us live in areas that are not prone to hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, or Godzilla. If you do choose to live in such places, it is important to be prepared, and have an emergency kit. In which you can just pack in a good ole' FM battery.
It would be much wiser to pack in a good ole' hand-crank FM radio. Prices range from just a few bucks on up. Around $30 will get you a halfway-decent radio/flashlight combo.
Of course, $5 will get you a hand-crank cellphone charger...
It's not just you, but I'm guessing you've never been in a tornado/hurricane shelter without power huddled around a battery powered radio listening to storm updates.
I bet you're right. I haven't either, but I still own a wind-up radio that's stored with all my disaster relief supplies. (That's not mine, mine is not for sale, just the first link I found with the same thing. I got mine at a yard sale.)
How do you explain phones that have identical international and US versions, and only the US version has the FM disabled?
That only in the US, the legal landscape is such that having the FM radio in there is a potential complication.
Disputing that fact either implies that she's absurdly pedantic
ObligatoryYouMustBeNewHere
However, not having FM support on my cell phone does significantly decrease my chances of hearing lite rock and smooth jazz.
(people who burried themselves in 2000, you can come out now.)
That's what They want you to think!!!
Even if Dr. Oz is a dunce advocating quackery, isn't that enough to boot him from the department without adding this?
I don't care about Dr Oz. He's a TV goofball and I couldn't pick him out of a lineup.
There is no place for democracy in matters concerning science.
It's not a matter concerning science. It's a matter concerning money, industry, the marketplace. I have no problem with the modification of genomes. Science is gonna do what they're gonna do.
The issue I've been raising has nothing to do with that. My issue comes up after the science is done and now it's industry selling a product to consumers.
Just disclose what's in the package in an honest and open way. It is not science to hide information from people. If you're afraid it's going to be too scary for consumers, then it's a matter for the marketing department, not for science.
Claiming this discussion is about "science" is a little bit dishonest, in fact.
The stupid are fun to watch.
From a distance, and upwind
No, that's determination and creativity. Determination alone is not enough, which was the point of the GP comment.
egrep -n '^[a-z].*\(' $ | sort -t':' +2.0