Comment Re:Why SPARC? (Score 1) 190
much less. Maybe the ability to run it in a couple of 3U boxes: I'd have to spreadsheet it to see.
much less. Maybe the ability to run it in a couple of 3U boxes: I'd have to spreadsheet it to see.
It should be: around the time of the acquisition the price performance ratio finally got back to where it was with the first SPARCs: ten times the price, 100 times the performance .
A 3U 4-socket T5 machine had about 128 full hardware threads (really: cores) the last time I looked seriously at it. The performance was a bit less than a 32-socket, 4-core-per -socket M9000, the machines I mostly worked with. In those days, I was a capacity planner and performance engineer at Sun Canada.
A lot, but not everything, is still available open-source from SPARC International.
--dave
"By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect "Hungry." -- a Larson cartoon