They can start by removing the part where a full mace blow to the face causes a slight concussion and little more. Then get rid of the part where goblin kings are a punch line.

The original hobbit caught the spirit and excitement of the great epic adventures. The only time where the Hobbit movie caught that same spirit was in the opening where they were washing dishes. It's There and Back Again. Other people in the background are making deep strategic moves over the fate of the world, but that's in the background.

Cookies and milk, please.

I don't care if you insult me.

But if you don't accept what science says, you're a denialist. And if you don't know what science says, then you're ignorant.

Reading through a lot of papers quickly at a time? That's what abstracts are for. Problem solved before you were born.

Thanks, but you're an utter moron. I don't care what you say. In fact, I'm amazed you manage to put two letters together, and congratulate you for that.

Yes, please answer that question. How many?
My hypothesis is the answer is close to zero. There are too many journals that will accept close to anything.

Yes. If only someone did a study to consider how many good papers didn't get published. This study didn't do it.

My hypothesis is the answer is close to zero. There are too many journals that will accept close to anything.

Considering the papers were eventually published anyway, it's hard to see how there's a huge problem here.
"Impactful papers don't always get in biggest journals" isn't the same as "peer review has a problem."

Wow! My life is great now!

That doesn't even make sense. If you're interested in science and finding out what is true and accurate, then stick around. If you just want to insult people when facts don't go your way, please leave.

Well yeah, that sounds so easy lol. Why don't we do it today?

Did you even read the rest of my post? If your answer to everything is, "someone should solve the problems of all these difficulties, and I won't think about them" then you're not very interesting to talk to lol.

That the models overestimate warming.

It wasn't allowed because it is too obvious?
For a patent office that allowed 1-click-purchasing, and anything that looks like "X on the net," this is a real change.

I can't speak for Scientific Word, but the attempts at front ends that I've used before have all been moderately difficult to understand didn't already have a latex mindset.