Comment Re:what is interesting is not that it won (Score 1) 591
But it's not the State establishing the exchange, which is what the argued-about language says.
I think everyone is in agreement that the exchange is being established, but the mealy-mouthed language of the law allows for this challenge based on what entity established it.
I'm no lawyer, and I'm glad the decision went the way it did. But clearly 9 Supreme Court Justices thought that it wasn't explicit enough, so they chose to hear the case.
I'm also glad that this is hopefully the last bitchy little petulant lawsuit regarding this legislation.