Comment Re:Convenience (Score 1) 214
First, software that you make for yourself and don't let others use. Not even through services. Google and Facebook are considered non-free in that regard
Right, but that's not what I'm asking about. If they're considered non-free, they don't fit the criteria of "free software" but not "open source software." I get how something can be "open source" but not "FIAF", I was looking for examples of the opposite.