Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Quick tip: this is where MS lost it (Score 1) 74

Download Microsoft Powertoys (not to be confused with Sysinternals). Universal, unformatted text paste available. No more shuffling it through Notepad.

There are a lot of quality of life features in it. All I do now is hit CTRL+ALT+V and plaintext, universally for the most part.

Comment Re:notepad doesn't fit in the Microsoft world (Score 1) 74

No. That's what Regedit (I use Registry Workshop) is for. There haven't been flat-file text configs since, I dunno, Windows 3.0? Everything beyond that, Windows 95+, it's just legacy jank. I like that 3rd parties refuse to use the registry, especially if it's a portable app, but I wish they'd let you know when they do. And then there's the whole AppData kerfuffle. Is it in Local? Local Low? Where the hell did you put your text config file?!

Many Win32 and AMD64 programs have plaintext configs, as do games. You still need a text editor. But for Microsoft stuff, I highly recommend Registry Workshop. Faster search. Undo. Multiple search windows. Really good stuff.

Comment Turn it off (Score 1) 74

You can literally tell Notepad to shut it all down. All of it.

Figure it out. It's in settings. The settings keep changing, but you can dock it all down to no-AI, no tab memory, does "exactly what it used to, and no more."

And if that's not good enough for you, get Notepad++ already. It's a much better text editor and can do markup and automatic indentation of code with a closeable tree. Most of what I used Notepad for was editing .cfg, .ini files, and scripts, and I expect that's what many of us do here.

Only people who don't understand computers will need to swallow this. Nerds, if that's still Slashdot, don't have to. Be a nerd. Shut it down.

Comment Re:Because... (Score 2) 186

Exactly. It's not just the cost of production, it's the cost of transportation/POS management/convenience/etc. TCO.

Anyone telling you that it's a bargain is only looking at the numbers... poorly. Poorly because it doesn't save enough money to bother in the first place when we had a $6.8 T budget in 2024. Kilobytes or megabytes on a multiple terabyte drive aren't worth the bother.

Comment Re:Because... (Score 2) 186

I mentioned the scale comprehension problem in its own thread. In a $1.8T discretionary budget (2024), you're talking about saving 1/16th of a peanut by going to coins. It's not even whole peanuts, guy, and 1/16th is charitable; it's far less than that.

$1 bills are fine as they are. We have much bigger fish to fry. You probably want to save at least $10 billion (0.556% of the discretionary federal budget) before it's even worth bothering.

There's no sense making everyone retool and reprice for such meager savings. It would only be change for change's sake (see what I did there?)

Comment Oooh! 56 million whole bucks? (Score 5, Insightful) 186

The federal budget last year was $1.8 T discretionary. That does not include mandatory items, which brings total spending to $6.8 T. This is worth a few megabytes on a terabyte SSD.

If I did my math right, 0.003% of the federal budget. At two decimal places, it's zero. As in 0.00% of the federal budget.

Big numbers are not big any more. It's a scale comprehension problem of the human brain. Any time anyone talks about how much so many million dollars is saving us, think about your disk drives. This is 56MB on your 6.8TB disk.

If a politician is not talking billions, they're saving us essentially nothing.

Comment Re:AI replacing thought (Score 1) 112

Not when it's illegal. If there's evidence, the DOJ should arrest Biden. Now.

Justice is the operative principle here. Did you learn how that works in high school or watching Bat-Man? Demand the DOJ bring Biden to justice if you are so inclined.

Spoiler Alert: There isn't evidence, there is no indictment coming, it's not "turnabout." What's happening now, in 2025, is blatant political persecution that would justify granting asylum to its victims in most countries. Nobody would have gotten asylum under Biden, because he didn't illegally persecute his political enemies.

This guy. This guy literally fired federal prosecutors to find others who would comply in their absence. Should tell you all you need to know. How many Biden firings over a specific indictment? Yeah. None. You clean house at the start of your term, not when a competent prosecutor gives an opinion that opposes political goals.

Comment Re:AI replacing thought (Score 1) 112

Lie. There are exactly zero political persecution cases ordered by Biden. That's because he had an independent DOJ. You can rationalize all you like, and think that Google searches reveal only facts (they don't), but there is no "whataboutism" here.

Jawboning social media to bury inconvenient facts and opinions? Yes. Senile old man and a coverup by his partisans? Yes. Stole the 2024 primary with said coverup? Yes.

Political prosecutions? Hell no. That's this administration. It has also pardoned violent criminals carte blanche.

The DOJ brought cases under Biden's term of office (note: Not "Biden's DOJ") because of profound evidence. People assaulting cops and defecating on desks. Someone apparently called and tried to strong arm votes they didn't get because they're a sore loser with severe behavioral health problems. People misrepresenting themselves as authorized electors. True mishandling and hoarding of classified documents. If you have a brain that isn't riddled with misinformation, or maybe parasites, there was freaking coup attempt called the "Green Bay sweep" that was narrowly averted by a just man unwilling to play ball with powers he didn't have. His own (previous) supporters then called for him to be lynched in response.

A violent attack on the Capitol was coordinated with this strategy as "public pressure." One man is on video running through the halls calling Nancy Pelosi's name as if they were Jack Nicholson in The Shining. A Republican senator, who plenty of my friends respect, was captured on video running for his life. There is documented video, audio, and written evidence to support indictments for all of that. Not everyone there was violent - a fair number of them weren't - but they also didn't have the sense to leave.

This was all allowed to happen by an executive that is sending in the National Guard at the drop of a hat to quell dissenters standing around and singing outside detention centers to have their grievances addressed. Actually, I've seen video of them cleaning public parks. Even they don't know why they're there.

It turns out that the people with true TDS are the supporters. You live in a deranged bubble if you truly believe what you say. Reality is a thing. Please walk toward the light. It's how you get out of the hole you're in. I won't assume what sort of hole it is.

Submission + - The Surveillance State Marches on, Police Drones Are Now Reading License Plates (eff.org) 1

Torodung writes: Police departments across the US are deploying, or planning to deploy, fleets of drones. The latest trend in the practice is to equip them with Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPR). These are being sold as first response tools with the added bonus of being able to track anyone and everyone on the way to the scene. According to the EFF, at the head of the marketing effort is Flock Safety, in addition to Motorolla, who have once again raised questions about conflicts between safety and privacy. Given the recent buzz around efforts to develop crime prediction, concerned Americans are becoming more conscious of law enforcement data collection and there is a growing movement to define the policies and procedures regarding its use and retention. As EFF writes:

Communities must demand restrictions on how local police use drones and ALPRs, let alone a dangerous hybrid of the two. Otherwise, we can soon expect that a drone will fly to any call for service and capture sensitive location information about every car in its flight path, capturing more ALPR data to add to the already too large databases of our movements.


Comment Re:Pentagon Papers (Score 1) 264

I think you missed the entire point of his post. Anyone who stays on and signs this agreement is an "access journalist" in his narrative. They don't do real work, they beg for a bowl of gruel, and will do anything to get it and parrot it.

The "hard-driving gumshoe drunks" are the ones who got us the Pentagon Papers in this narrative, not the "access journalists." He may be describing them as reprobates, but he admires them. They do their work. They don't let mama bird digest the information and spit it into their mouths. They go find the worms and show them to everyone in their full rot and glory.

Get it now?

Slashdot Top Deals

I'd rather just believe that it's done by little elves running around.

Working...