Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Nice wording (Score 1) 179

... there is a widespread lack of knowledge in the US about the UN bill of human rights and that the US has ratified it. (At least the more basic parts where it clearly says that human rights should be applied equally regardless of nationality.)

What you're referring to is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which the US helped to draft. And of course it doesn't include the ridiculous "Universal Declaration of Human Rights", which is a completely useless exercise in flexing international power, including a huge caveat on all of its supposed protection that basically says nothing in it applies if it gets in the way of the United Nation's plans and activities.

But the ICCPR doesn't say that a country cannot confer rights to its own citizens that it doesn't confer to others, only that the rights spelled out in the covenant must be conferred to everyone. And there is nothing like the Constitution's 4th Amendment protections against search and seizure in the Covenant. The closest it comes is a blanket statement that "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence...", but those "arbitrary or unlawful" qualifiers are a huge loophole, especially the way the US administration has been defending their metadata collection as lawfully authorized.

And the huge loophole right at the top of the Covenant is this:

In time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation and the existence of which is officially proclaimed, the States Parties to the present Covenant may take measures derogating from their obligations under the present Covenant to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation

Don't you know the US is threatened by ISIS / ISIL / Al Shibob / Al Queuidea / whatever, and with that can justify throwing out those protections.

Comment Re:Great feel but poor ergo ... (Score 1) 304

Kinesis, who makes the Advantage series (crazy bowl shaped keyboard that I'm typing on right now and love to pieces) also makes the Freestyle (two halves), and they make the latter in a Bluetooth configuration. Amusingly, a wireless keyboard with a wire (between the two halves).

No good for me - I gotta have a number pad. Okay - I see they have an add-on keypad available, but it looks like the tilt stands are all add-on options too. So that makes the Freestyle a little to pricey. Not sure from the description about the keys, either. I'll probably just have to stick with getting another ErgoMagic keyboard when my current one wears out.

Comment Re:Yet again government agency abuses privacy (Score 1) 191

So this is exactly why Apple would encrypt their entire phone and did not leave a way for them to decrypt their own devices... so that they can avoid situations like this...

Irrelevant in this case, because she (foolishly) consented to the search. We can assume she would have handed over they keys as well, since she didn't object to the search.

Comment Re:STOP THE VIDEO ADS SLASHDOT! (Score 1) 154

Just in case you aren't aware: You can block all that if you use Firefox and a few add-ons: AdBlock Plus, AniDisableHacked and NoScript. They allow me to block out video, among other things.

You don't even need any of that. Just go to Tools -> Add-ons, find Shockwave Flash, and change "Always Activate" to "Ask to Activate". Works for every website all the time.

Comment Re:Math is hard? (Score 1) 283

Still can't handle facts, can you? Care to even try to provide ANY sources for your assertions of Soros as an angel (we'll just forget about how he earned his wealth by trading art the Nazis stole from the Jews they put into gas chambers)?

Bah! Why do I try? You'll never acknowledge facts - you just want to promote a boogieman meme with no basis in reality.

Comment Re:Math is hard? (Score 1) 283

You are gullible. You haven't even managed to name a right wing equivalent of the Koch Brothers, but that doesn't stop you believing that they must exist.

There's no right-wing equivalent of media matters, the EPA, the IRS, or the Leo W. Gerard, either, but that doesn't stop you from being their useful idiot anyway, with your head firmly embedded up your ass so you don't have to face reality.

BTW - here's your sign.

Comment Re:Math is hard? (Score 1) 283

WOW. Just wow. I predicted the usual "it's okay if my side does it" response, but you've gone straight for the "Soros is an angel and Koch's tiny-by-comparison funds are evil incarnate" response instead.

George Soros is a philanthropist, giving his money away to help others less fortunate.

Thanks for epitomizing the stereotypical "useful idiot". Ironically, you called me "gullible". I guess we can add your picture to the "projection" entry in the DSM.

Comment Re:Math is hard? (Score 1) 283

Comment Re:Nevertheless, Microsoft is doomed (Score 4, Insightful) 93

But in a few years - say three at the max, Android makers will realise that these patents are really worthless, and back away from their agreements.

Once you sign an agreement, it doesn't really matter whether the patent is worthless or not - you've agreed to the payments contractually, and that's still legally binding. Samsung is attempting to use some clause in the contract to claim that Microsoft Corporation has done something to invalidate the agreement - that is, transforming to a company with a major smartphone manufacturing subdivision. Maybe that will work, I don't know.

Comment Re:Not where *I* work. (Score 1) 342

We have two female programmers on our team of 10 devs (total). They are paid equivalently to the males, receive the same training opportunities, and each holds expert status in some region of our offerings. The men do not joke about about them (I would know, being one of the male devs and all, I would hear it). If that kind of thing started up it would be nipped in the bud......as it was a few years ago when we hired, then shortly thereafter fired, a guy who turned out to be outright misogynistic.

I am not denying the trend in the industry, I am just pointing out that there *are* places that refuse to hire unprofessional jerks, and will treat all their employees with respect.

I'm not really convinced it's a trend in the industry - if anything, the trend is more toward the kind of environment where you work. I've worked at many organizations, both technology organization and it IT in other types of companies, and what you describe is more the norm, while the hostile-to-women places are the outliers. In fact, I've only worked at ONE place that was like that (I'll go ahead and name names - it was Capital One), and I only worked there three days before I quit - and I'm not even a woman.

Comment Re:Conservatives crying "no fair"? (Score 1) 283

Common carriers are regulated, but they don't have the kinds of restrictions you're talking about. Part of the point of a common carrier is that nobody is allowed to inspect the contents in order to determine what's in there.

That isn't really the case (there are clearly many organizations and government agencies inspecting the contents of all kinds of things these days, whether it's on a common carrier or not). And you missed the "LAWFUL content" part. How will they know if it's lawful or not if it's not inspected? Inspection of content (to determine whether it is allowed or not) will be MANDATORY!

Slashdot Top Deals

"Unibus timeout fatal trap program lost sorry" - An error message printed by DEC's RSTS operating system for the PDP-11

Working...