Comment Re:He, Him, His (Score 1) 150
While most of his writing is good stuff he wasn't exactly Joseph Conrad so there's not so much focus on the people in the stories.
It would have helped if he'd used that time to actually come up with a plan........
What plan then - help ISIS, help other groups backed by Iran or help Assad?
I'm not sure time would have helped. A major worry now is ISIS went for deliberate provocation and seem to want us to drop bombs on the area and we are doing exactly what they want. Why they want it is a bit of a mystery, but those video nasties were designed for that purpose.
There never where smart people here, just technicians and wannabe technicians with an inflated sense of self importance.
Not true, when this site started I was a professional engineer - it's only now that I'm a wannabe technician with an inflated sense of self importance.
short answer: yes.
I would not trust their 'fix' if they actually work at the filesystem level.
you'd think this was a sector based issue. you'd think!
even if there is a dos bootable for this, unless it understands ext2/3/4 (and maybe others; jfs, reiser, xfs) then linux guys ARE screwed by this.
I don't trust samsung. but sadly, I did buy a bunch of 840 evo drives over the last year or 2. damn.
samsung is known as the company that makes things last 'the warranty period + 1 day'. almost literally. almost to an art form.
samsung lcd's also are built like crap. one after another, their electrolytics die (fake china caps; like so many others). buying japanese (nichicon, panasonic, etc) low ESR caps usually brings the monitors back to life. I've fished several out of the trash cans and restored them via simple psu cap replacements.
but dammit samsung, why do you have to be SO cheap??
guess I should start avoiding all samsung things, now. I'm tired of their crap.
Here's a list of 62 volunteer-management packages. Some are web based. Some are free. Somewhere in there should be something that solves your problem.
Hmm, now I'm curious. A fighter may have a takeoff weight of say 15000kg. Let's say that the "short lean female" saves 40kg over an "average male". With the other reductions - clothing, oxygen, etc - you probably get down to maybe a 60kg savings. That's a 0,4% reduction in system mass. The rocket equation (applicable here too) probably boosts that up to about a 0,5% benefit in many regards. Still not that much
However, if you can shrink the cockpit , then you're looking at a much bigger advantage - possibly 100-200kg extra weight savings and maybe cutting 5-10% off the total aero drag. That could actually be a big deal - relevantly faster accelerations, top speed, range, etc.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. - Andy Finkel, computer guy