For complicated c9mbos, perhaps. But random string generators should relatively quickly stumble across an elipsis in the middle of Latin or Arabic characters.
I wouldn't a priori suspect a string display routine to have a problem, but the guy who wrote it to do some gymnastics switching character sets should, and should have run such a test in a debugger ready to trap bad memory accesses.
Not necessarily. You could use AI to reject things if it gets scared.
The patent itself is worthless to find any basic, quick facts, for that matter.
"Unfair competition", against government laws whose purpose is, against the concept of freedom, to restrict competition? Against a government/big business coalition to carve up the rights to sell to people-qua-owned cattle?
How ludicrous.
> there's'nt
Your second apostrophe should be between the "n" and the "t".
What about the cover-up?
What coverup? Oh, the one that has to be there so the GOP can blame Obama for something. Fuck, people talk about "BDS" but "ODS" is damn near a clinical diagnosis in the reactionary population here.
I think you made a typo:
Mozilla 2015: We want to continue to exist, and are currently dependent on a competitor.
(Handful of noisy) Users 2015: WAHT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING! You can't survive, you have the stay unchanging and do exactly as we want without ever bothering us even if that means you go out of business. Oh fuck it I don't want you SPYING on me, you terrible people. I'm going to use Chrome!
Why do you rape us with this kind of shit?
This is the sort of unhinged bullshit that makes me disregard the criticism directed towards Mozilla these days.
Not much, but the disappointment is that it isn't an Intel GPU.
Nah. The real threat wasn't anything overtly violent or traitorous.
The nerds had agreed to stop reproducing by not having sex.
This is the follow-up experiment to one run in the Netherlands over 20 years ago with LPG cars. (Did you know you can convert your car to run on natural gas, and have a switch to flip between the that and gasoline, for about $3000? Who knew?)
But rather than drive adoption of this by letting the much cheaper natural gas work its magic, they slapped a huge annual tax on said cars, so you would have to drive the equivalent of ~20,000 miles just to break even.
From that observation, pointing out how government concern for the environment was just lip service compared to its voracious desire for money, I predicted similar things for other developments in the future.
Well, here we are. Note in both cases they do this before, not after, achieving the ostensible goal of getting most, or even many, people on board such cars.
"They just want your money" -- 89,768-0 in predictive analysis of government action.
He also ignores that officials, happy to buy votes by spending taxes, will tax what the market can provide, so to speak, rather than what is needed.
This is why they mentally tie spending, taxing, and borrowing to the GDP rather than population or necessity. They want to be as high a fraction of that as possible. There's always more votes to buy.
It has nothing to do with necessity or population.
Crappy used laptops are cheap. You don't need 16. You need 4. The first one will be about done by the time you get the 4th one started.
To program is to be.
