Have you considered some of this people maybe not like your approach and actually sabotage the interview because they would want to work in the same firm as yourself? It is also the point of the interviews for the candidates, interviews are a two way street.

I am not, but I have an ex who fits the previous description.

Actually you are talking about my worst nightmare. My wife is talking about going on their dream holiday, and I really do not want to be anywhere near Italy.

A woman at 45 in the USA will have got the assets of her ex....no beauty but money.

Your forgot the feminist and the cynic, and the later seems to get increased with age.

You could argue? You are fucking kidding me. Try to subscribe one within the experimental period, and you will see how soon someone "in your area" talks to you, just to get you as a paid customer. You know, there are people paid to do that, some people even reported some of these people even attended first meetings as cover. This comment must be very naive indeed.

Amen brother. The problem is that most women, despite being a nut job and fat, want the perfect male.

What wrong women? Nowadays when you visit the USA or lately the UK, it seems you are swimming in a sea full of whales. Been out of home lately?

Think of all the money you saved. Buy I suspect your problem is that your are chasing women out of your league, and only from a single paragraph.

I agree with you in the bloodsucking part, however you did not get the message. It is when bypassing them is giving them the ultimate middle finger...from the grave. Why do we have to spell it out everything for slashdot people...?...I wonder.

(and by writing this, it does not mean I do not know there are other advanced methods, and deep packet inspection, and whatever...) So dear slashdot reader, if you feel itchy commenting that how about washing the cat or the laundry?

Or often not that subtle. Most of the basic malware that infect wordpress sites and similar nowadays just do simple mathematical operations on the data of connections to outside do avoid detection by signatures.

Nothing wrong. Whilst in paper you can design the most perfect of the setups, in the field that wont happen for multitude of reasons, from technical, to political and ending on work needs. Good luck blocking IPsec into many sites. The blocking capabilities of many products just give you a false sense of security, and frankly if you are using IPS to block and manage unwanted traffic protocols, you are doing it wrong.

Whilst most of the firewall products nowadays do provide proxies or web interfaces for users (for instance WebVPN in Cisco products), I do find it is a terrible idea to open up services and use up resources from the firewall. Just look at the long list of the security advices from WebVPN in Cisco for instance. I do follow the policy of minimum services that i have as a baggage as a Unix admin, and webvpn/proxy/VPN services are all provided by external servers. For instance, pfSense is quite nifty for that, or squid+dansguardian. Why not provide access or provide unrestrictive access in a wifi network for BYOD? They can as well pierce your firewall with personal VPN services, they are very cheap nowadays. As for the corporate network, many people do not understand how a culture of unrestricted access to social networks and allowing adverts is a covert channel to infect personal computers. Also if you want to invest in security and money is not a problem, have a look at the Capsule concept from Checkpoint.

Have you ever seen a devop presentation from facebook or better yet twitter techs? This piece of infomercial is rubbish.