.. and are questionable boot strapping projects.
The biggest cost and therefore barrier to Space exploration is launch costs. These needs to be side stepped.
Launch a design prize for low cost probes to be sent in their dozens, hundreds or perhaps even
thousands to the asteroid belt on low energy transfer trajectories. These need to include cheap & reliable ways to analyse the asteroids for useful materials.
Have a second round to design low cost extraction 'bots' to follow up the analysis probes to 'mine' those materials. These could hoard the supplies or even again use low energy transfer to Earth/Lunar Lagrangian points.
Sell futures to fund the next step based on the value of those materials.
We don't need (and probably don't want) full functional Von Neumann machines.
Or will the UK once again prove to be a lapdog of the US government.
I'm not familiar with this meme, would charging him or letting him off make the UK a lapdog?
This is how good science is supposed to work, peer review to find faults and ongoing refinement until certainty is attained.
If this was not a challenge it would not be Science.
Or they could just waiting until their old tax disc expires/ receive their renewal notice before swapping to to the new system.
The majority of people whinging on twitter are just idiots.
"Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull