More so, since the livestock tends to be kept separated
Obviously you have never visited, driven past or even seen on television, one of these farms.
they're literally disease farms
And, not to mention, the single largest consumer of water and the single largest source of carbon emissions.
I've not heard of anyone being sued due to overprescribing them
I have; potentially life-threatening allergies to various classes of antibiotics (especially tetracyclines) are not all that uncommon.
If you make a sexist joke (or repost one) and then investigate anyone for sexual harassment then your impartiality will be questioned.
Tautologies aside, any comments, made in jest or otherwise, which might suggest a specific and relevant prejudice are sufficient grounds on which to question someone's impartiality.
Sorry for all the italics, but the specifics are pretty important here.
Because there is nothing in the GPL that forbids you from linking with propietary code like the Minecraft Server
True, but the GPL certainly does prohibit you from distributing the combination. That is why the Linux kernel uses GPL shims for binary driver blobs which are themselves distributed separately.
It's right, but not quite complete. Mojang is now the developer of CraftBukkit and Bukkit. So one of the previous Bukkit developers is asserting their copyright to try and prevent Mojang (or anyone) from distributing the infringing CraftBukkit mod.
Again, the parent is also missing the important point that any individual person is still perfectly within their rights if they personally compile and use CraftBukkit. Only distribution of the GPL/incompatible combo code/binaries is prohibited.
Mojang could have shut down CraftBukkit any time they wanted to. But so can any of the Bukkit developers, because it's not in compliance with the GPL either.
I guess you missed that Mojang is now the owner/distributor of both Bukkit and CraftBukkit? Of course they don't hold copyright for all of the various previous commits to Bukkit. So, indeed as you say, one of the Bukkit developers is asserting copyright to prevent Mojang from using Bukkit in CraftBukkit while the "Craft" part of that is incompatibly licensed.
Yes, putting his projects under GPL was not legal in the first place because it linked to non-GPL code.
False. As an accurate AC stated above:
His code is in a project which doesn't depend on the Minecraft server code. It is also, illegally, used in a mod which does depend on the server code.
His code is in a project which doesn't depend on the Minecraft server code. It is also, illegally, used in a mod which does depend on the server code.
The AC is accurate; your comment isn't.
"It may be that our role on this planet is not to worship God but to create him." -Arthur C. Clarke