Comment Re:Why not have mechanical security too? (Score 1) 147
This isn't about comebacks. For me, anyway.
This isn't about comebacks. For me, anyway.
I guess the irony here is lost on you.
To put it in your own retarded words:
Thanks, but I did think about what i wrote first. However obviously you must have understood it much better than I, so if you could point me to the part that describes how I personally assume that any particular system was secure, I'd be much ablidged[sic].
No one expects any one system to be 100% fooolproof
I'm pretty sure that's not true. For an example of a safe manufacturer that does expect this, see this very story.
Are you done now making yourself look like an idiot?
They probably didn't imagine their electronic lock to be vulnerable; you'd only install a mechanical backup if you already assume that your primary locking mechanism is not secure. News at 11, "smart" guy.
You screwed it up yet again. Here you go
BSD doesn't have "distributions" in the way GNU/Linux does, dear AC. The concept doesn't quite apply.
If the email is here, it is here, and nobody is going to delete it.
Oh, it's actually HTML you say? Great, I didn't want to read that crap in the first place.
I'm using openbsd for all my work
Nice to see more distros do this stuff.
Something tells me you aren't as familiar with the BSDs as you pretend to be. What could it possibly be?
Oho, someone forgot to tick the AC checkbox...
Down = left blinker, up = right blinker
That's actual not a good way to remember this.
You generally turn the lever into the direction in which you are going to turn the steering wheel.
Consistency at last!
The main factors are: do you log in on average as frequently as the average (probably median) Slashdotter
My experience doesn't support that point. I've been logged for ages. My karma has been "Excellent" for a longish time.
My meta-moderation score can't be particularly good, as I'm sharing quite a bunch of unpopular opinions, and also tend to give the occasional troll some credit where deserved. So if what you say is true, I should not be getting much opportunity to moderate. Yet I frequently drown in mod points, 15 at a time.
, and do you have a good or neutral metamoderation score.
Oh and there's the catch-22 that you're not going to be meta-moderated before you had a chance to moderate in the first place. But hey, let's ignore the pesky details, right?
[mod points] linked to karma
completely false
(intentionally blank)
Maybe it is like it is because most of the people realize that it is indeed mostly linked to karma. The responders trying to make it look like I had claimed to be completely deterministic are tearing down straw-men.
If you think the people responding to a given post are representative of the prevailing opinion on
Mod points are handed out at random.
No, it's linked to karma
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. -- Albert Einstein