So, when people in the US publish lists of credit card numbers or social security numbers (or whatever is the newest hobby on the US interwebz), it's all fine and dandy because it's speaking the truth?
This situation does not fall under the new legislation domain. There is already a multitude of laws dealing with this exact problem.
I like how one of the worst CEO's of all time still makes enough money to go on a $2 billion shopping spree.
At my job, I only get a bonus when I perform above expectations...
Parent deserves at least a +1 for the visual of Baron Harkonnen cosplay.
“the scope of the compromised knowledge related to US intelligence capabilities is staggering”
Well isn't that just terribly sad for them. My heart bleeds. Ed Snowden, if we ever meet, the first beer is my shout.
Perhaps Wood's hole can fund another?
Yes, because human beings can totally stay 100% focused and productive during the entire day. Unless you're an unethical and lazy communist ofcourse.
I wonder how many CEOs actually believe in this drivel...
Owning the means of distribution is a traditional function of local government. We call our roads and bridges and water and sewer pipe networks public infrastructure for a reason. In the 19th century local and state governments concluded that the transportation of people and goods was so essential to a modern economy that the key distribution system must be publicly owned. In the 21st century the transportation of information is equally essential.
Is the internet essential infrastructure? Should local governments step in to preserve equality of access?
An adequate bootstrap is a contradiction in terms.