Funny how you complain about people being young and childish, and then act that way yourself.
Randi Harper is gainfully employed on the board of directors of a non-profit.
She founded it herself, and it's stacked only with other professional victims. Her "gainful employment" consists of begging for money on Twitter.
Periods of inactivity on open source projects does not disqualify someone from being a developer.
It kinda does since a developer is a job position, and a job requires that you 'do' stuff. Thus, Randi might qualify as a professional victim, or a beggar, but not as someone that actually develops.
Your dismissal of complaints about being unable to advance don't address any of the points being made. You seem to be arguing that because you peaked the same reasons must apply to everyone else, which is absurd.
He argues that reality applies to all of us. You seem to disagree. This reminds me of a recent South Park episode on safe spaces.
Wu's game was widely praised by critics. Your superficial critique of the visual style suggests you haven't played it.
Seriously? Come on, no one actually believes that. Not even Wu herself.
The "critics" that reviewed her game wanted to signal what side of the debate they were on. The reviews were more about Wu than the game.
Heh, now that I look for it on Steam, it seems to have been pulled. Maybe it was too "good" for Steam, eh?