I already fail to understand why you need a different app for different webpages. Why do you need an app for Facebook, for Youtube, for whatever else where there's a webpage you can access with a browser?

Let's hope it stays that way, dies a fiery death and serves as a warning for wannabe-copycats to avoid ideas like this like the plague.

It did get press cover? Am I reading the wrong (or was that right?) news outlets?

Seriously, what?

Ok, could someone please explain to me whether I'm just living under a rock and am the only one who never heard about this new hip and trendy product, or whether this is just a very weak attempt to astroturf for yet another AI crap nobody gives a fuck about to pretend it's relevant.

Dude, get your head out of your ass. Quite frankly, if you want to make a point, make it one that is a little less ridiculous.

Most education facility today is pretty good at stunting the growth of your mind, no aid from ChatGPT required.

"This is the taboo question that no none is allowed to ask, because everyone already knows the answer, and the answer is not the evil racist white man."

In fact that often IS the answer. Nations were destroyed with colonialism, and racism was literally invented to excuse it. Many have also been deliberately suppressed since through various foul means including sanctions, backing coups, and outright assassination. That answer is the real taboo, especially if you ask the governments responsible.

It's called RAIL.

No, I am not seeing that at all. I see plenty of cops. I see some every day that I go out.

Lolol modded down by someone who knows nothing as usual.

"AI" is not thinking. It chews up data and shits out data. If the shit is valid it's only a coincidence.

Could you explain then why they flock to Sweden, of all the places? It's not exactly known for its ruthless Ayn-Randish capitalism.

I can already pay with my debit or credit card for free, why the hell would I accept a 2% surcharge to pay with that junk?

Who said they won't "change their mind" somewhere down the road? It's obvious they are considering it and just telling me that they won't doesn't mean a thing. That would require me to actually trust Sony.

And at best, I'd thrust them. Into the sun.

All the more reason to make sure the money is being spent properly.

For the record, as an American taxpayer I have no problems funding clean energy projects in developing nations. Fossil energy may be cheap for now but it creates both environmental and socioeconomic disasters that are extremely difficult to fix. We have the technology to avoid making the same mistake, let's use it.
=Smidge=

> Why, when no first world nation does the same?

Because first world nations are spending their own money. These nations are not; They are soliciting funds from others, and the lenders would like to know where the money is going.

Regardless of the bullshit you clearly believe about how these projects are funded domestically, this ask seems entirely reasonable.
=Smidge=