Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:learning curve? (Score 2, Insightful) 72

That's delusional. I've been at this longer than a lot of users here have been alive, yet the only "complex" applications I've seen are either unnecessarily complex or complex for reasons completely unrelated to programming.

It's not like cooking at all. That's just wishful thinking.

Programming is easy. Ridiculously easy. You know this, I know this. Why hide it?

Why not produce easy tools for non-programmers to use? We use programming languages to make writing software easier, after all. Why are modern languages and tools becoming increasingly more complex? Software isn't getting more complex in general, so why are our tools? What are we afraid will happen? That we'll lose our jobs? That people won't admire us for a skill easily attainable by young children?

there's nothing wrong with making tuna casserole (using Hypercard to create a simple database application), but don't try to kid yourself it's basically the same thing as creating a full course meal at a four-star restaurant (writing low-level, high-performance code in C).

But it is! The EXACT same skills and principles apply equally in both cases. (Note: This is not the case for cooking. Your analogy breaks immediately.) The only difference is that you need to know a few additional technical details to use C effectively. That's tangential to programming, no different than something like domain specific knowledge you'd need writing programs for use in different industries.

Comment Re:learning curve? (Score 2) 72

They did ... once upon a time. Remember HyperCard?

I don't know why people are so desperate to believe that programming is difficult. How old were you when you (very likely on your own) learned to program? 8 or 9 years old?

I know, I know, if we give the unwashed masses simple and powerful tools they'll write bad code. The horror. Better leave it to the professionals. Surely, they never produce unmaintainable garbage...

Comment Re:Firefox OS is now totally irrelevant. (Score 1) 50

Why would anyone, aside from maybe a very small number of fringe "openness" idealists, ever consider Firefox OS if a real Android phone can be obtained for about the same price?

$100 is not about the same as $33. This is particularly true in India, where the average annual income is around $1,500.

Comment Re:Fallacy (Score 1) 937

And how is that supposed to work for non windows systems?

On Linux: Ctrl+Shift U0246 or Ctrl+Shift+U 0246

On MacOS: Option+U o

You did not post a german umlaut,

I know. I answered the question you asked. Both of them, actually, assuming that you're not an idiot. (Did I give you too much credit?)

How did you get the umlaut oe into /. btw? is that a german one or a special one that just looks a like?

I think I see the confusion:

Obviously the 'rock star programmer' is oblivious about the question behind the question: what 'code' is that?

246 -- it's right there in my previous answer. I'm sorry you missed it, it would have saved you quite a bit of trouble.

(BTW, you're not a native speaker so you might have missed the obvious. My "rock star" post was a joke. A good one, I might add, as it even got a +5 funny. Go read it again, you'll figure it out.)

Comment Re:Fallacy (Score 1) 937

except, one that has less animal sacrifice,

Thankfully, vivisection is no longer widely practiced. Though you'll still find quite a bit of animal sacrifice in science. Far more, I suspect, that you'll find from all religious groups combined.

Comment Re:illogical captain (Score 1) 937

There is no evidence that free-will is in fact "free" and that self-awareness is not an epiphenomenon of materialism.

Oops, you forgot that Sam Harris is incompetent ... or that Dan Dennet isn't a very good philosopher. Depending on who you read that gave you such a silly idea.

If awareness was epiphenomenal, it wouldn't be possible for us to report on the content of our subjective experience. (The brain wouldn't have access to that content, by definition.)

Dennet knows this, but ignores it to sell pop-philosophy books. Harris might not, so I'll give him a pass.

Comment Re:No, no. Let's not go there. Please. (Score 1) 937

Who the *f..k* is so idiotic to visit an atheist web site? Do you really believe 'such' web sites are hosted by atheists?

Yes, I do. I'm a big fan of reality, after all. Are you really claiming that all of the various atheist sites, blogs, forums, etc. are all hoaxes created by theists to ... do what, exactly?

No, no one has noticed that. Do you indeed have atheist 'groups' in the USA?

Not just in the USA, there are atheist groups all over the world -- including Germany. You can pretend that they don't exist if you like. You don't seem fond of reality.

As an atheist, I really would appreciate, to be left alone

Then why are you participating in the discussion here? Your actions are clearly contrary to your stated goals!

Slashdot Top Deals

The sum of the Universe is zero.

Working...