
If certain analysts had their way, Hewlett-Packard would end up as multiple companies, each focused on a different technology segment.
Analyst Steven Milunovich of UBS initiated coverage of Hewlett-Packard on Wednesday with a splash, arguing that the company could better unlock value by spinning off a portion of the business, specifically printers and PCs. The “core” HP would apparently remain as an enterprise services business, competing with IBM and EMC in the servers, software, storage and solutions space.
If this sounds familiar, of course, it should: that was the argument made by then-CEO Leo Apotheker during his brief tenure. Last September, current chief executive (and former eBay CEO) Meg Whitman was brought in to reverse course, and announced that HP would hold onto its PC business.
“The challenge of ‘better together,’ as HP puts it, has multiple facets that might favor being ‘smart apart,’” Milunovich wrote in the report. (“Better together” has been Whitman’s slogan for the unified HP business.)
Under the current structure, HP’s printer and PC businesses are under the control of Tom Bradley, once thought to be the natural choice to lead a printer/PC spinoff. The central arguments for such a spinoff—that PCs are a low-margin business, and might flourish with an optimized supply chain—remain valid. Milunovich also argued that printers are in a slow decline.
For her part, Whitman argues that the combined might of a server and PC business actually lowers costs via improved volume demand, and that servers, printers, and PC all are part of a unified product line. UBS obviously disagrees.
“HP is surrounded, being attacked in enterprise computing by focused goliaths like IBM and EMC and in end-user computing by Apple, Lenovo, and Samsung,” Milunovich added.
UBS claims it’s believed that HP should break itself up for more than seven years. The firm has begun beating the drum again with a “Sell” rating on HP stock, which is down about 28 percent this year.
For a large corporate customer like Boeing, buying a unified package of PCs, servers, and software solutions might make sense. But for a data center operator, whose PC needs are minimal, a broken-up HP might focus the resulting companies and assets more on the needs of enterprise customers.
Meanwhile, HP has taken its own steps toward reshuffling, announcing organizational changes within its enterprise business.
On Aug. 8, HP announced that it has appointed Mike Nefkens, currently senior vice president and general manager of HP Enterprise Services EMEA, to lead HP ES on an acting basis. John Visentin, who previously ran HP ES, will be leaving the company to pursue other interests. HP also announced that Jean-Jacques (JJ) Charhon, senior vice president and chief financial officer of HP ES, had been appointed chief operating officer for HP ES; he will focus on increasing customer satisfaction and improving service delivery efficiency, which will help drive profitable growth.
Image: pcruciatti/Shutterstock.com


You wrote an article about HP being broken up without a single mention of Agilent?
...really?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Twitter
@hiconcep 어제 올리신 이 트윗이 'IT분야 유명인의 트윗 랭킹'에서 1위를 차지했습니다! (멘션을 원치 않으시다면, 꼭 알려주세요~) 안드로이드용 T99 다운받기: http://t.co/WZXdObKT #T99
@hiconcep IT쪽처럼 부침이 심한 분야도 없는 싶습니다. 권불십년은 커녕 5년도 장담 못하니...
@hiconcep hp 사사를 보면 계속해서 고부가가치 분야로 옮겨가는 b2b 기업 컬러가 확실한데 scm 관리등이 핵심인 저부가가치 비즈니스를 붙잡고 포기하지 않는 건지 궁금하기 짝이 없는..
@coldera IBM처럼 일찌감치 손을 뗐으면 좋았을텐데, 이제는 별 관심을 가지는 곳들이 없어서가 아닐까 싶기도 합니다.
@AlainSTweets http://t.co/VwcBmyB9