SwarmOS Demonstrated at Idea Festival 142
PacoCheezdom writes "Intelligent Life has short summary of a demonstration by MIT professor James McLurkin of his new group-minded robots, which run an operating system called 'Swarm OS'. The robots are able to work together as a group not by communicating with all members of the group at once, but by talking only to their neighbors, and model other similar behaviors performed by bees and ants. "
My experience (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:My experience (Score:2, Interesting)
I've always thought robot swarms would be good for stuff like landfill reclamation. Teach it to recognize something you want picked up and then set them loose. Tell each other when they've found something or when they need help moving it, etc.
Might not be worth the ROI though.
Boids (Score:5, Interesting)
Reynolds gave his boids 3 rules:
1 Don't crowd too close to other boids
2 Try to go the same direction as other boids near you
3 Try to be in the average position of your local neighbors.
With just those three simple rules, the boids arranged themselves in a flock. Much to Reynolds surprise, without any more rules than that, the flock exhibited other emergent behavior, such as a flock that split up to go around an obstacle would rejoin.
More at: http://www.red3d.com/cwr/boids/ [red3d.com]
Practical application: self-laying mines (Score:3, Interesting)
(Yes I have MOD points today...it's just more fun to talk.)
Re:My experience (Score:3, Interesting)
I believe that's even been discussed here on
This topic isn't new (Score:1, Interesting)
http://www.amazon.com/Prey-Michael-Crichton/dp/0066214122/ref=sr_1_13/104-4197432-5312718?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190057918&sr=8-13 [amazon.com]
Swarm racer (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:wha? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Boids (Score:1, Interesting)
http://www.erik-rasmussen.com/multiagent/ [erik-rasmussen.com]
For what it's worth...
Re:My experience (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Boids (Score:4, Interesting)
Tamás Vicsek, András Czirók, Eshel Ben-Jacob, and Inon Cohen ``Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 1226 (1995)
Another great paper:
Couzin, I.D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G.D. & Franks, N.R. (2002) Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups [princeton.edu] Journal of Theoretical Biology 218, 1-11.
In the above, a phenomenon called "collective memory" was exhibited in a model similar to Reynolds'. Individual members of the group have no explicit memory, but the group as a whole exhibits behavior that differs depending on the previous state of the group - in effect a "group memory".
Also, a shameless plug for my own software/API designed for similar simulations: glSwarm [sourceforge.net]. Admittedly in a very early state of development, but functional enough to play with.
Re:wha? (Score:5, Interesting)
More practical. How about Earthmoving equipment or coal mining.
Some exotic ideas. Military robots that gather intelligence. You
drop thousands of these on the enemy's side and they look out to see what is going on and report back via "the grape vine". There would be tens of tousands of communications paths, far to many to jam. They also watch out for each other and communicate warnings like "hide, someone is coming." Sensor could be very primitive, perhaps just a microphone or a cellphone-like camera, but by working together they can use triangulation to locate moving targets.
They don't have to be robots. What about a self configuring network? Each node only sees a few other nodes but they all talk about what they've seen and the word gets around that there is a printer on the second floor available for anyone who is a member of the graphic arts department to use.
Re:My experience (Score:3, Interesting)
No real applications?
Forget about land mines, or rescue operations or other such high-minded things. Not that they aren't worthwhile, but they don't speak to most peoples' everyday life.
How about self-driving cars?
It seems tailor-made for that one.