Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Bibdesk and CVS or SVN for Latex on Mac (Score 1) 122

by m0nstr42 (#31105148) Attached to: Document Management For Research With Annotation?
If you use a Mac and are in a Latex-centric field, I find Bibdesk ( really great for managing reference pdfs and use cvs or svn if I really want to manage a document I'm working on. There's no annotation in Bibdesk but you can record notes and it generates bibtex for you.

Comment: Re:"Success Rate" not "Accuracy" (Score 1) 266

by m0nstr42 (#30813828) Attached to: Nano-Scale Robot Arm Moves Atoms With 100% Accuracy
Accuracy, to an experimentalist, is a quantitative measure of closeness to the "correct" value (i.e. accuracy vs. precision).

Anyways, as the pp said, this is really just an example of poor reporting. The actual article doesn't really make this kind of claim, in fact the word "accuracy" doesn't even appear in TFA. They'd never get published in Nature (it's actually Nature Nanotechnology) saying something was "100% accurate" because it doesn't make any sense formally.

Comment: Re:"Success Rate" not "Accuracy" (Score 3, Interesting) 266

by m0nstr42 (#30811776) Attached to: Nano-Scale Robot Arm Moves Atoms With 100% Accuracy

"100% Accuracy" implies a positional error of zero meters (to infinite decimal places), which is obviously not what they're talking about.

I caught that, too. But really "percent" doesn't even make sense as a unit of accuracy, does it? Unless it's fractional, in which case I'd take it to mean that if you want to make a relative move of x, you'll get something in the range (0,2x) or maybe (0.5x, 1.5x)? I mean, on the nano scale that's still kind of remarkable, but as you've pointed out it's just not what they mean. /pedantic

Comment: Re:Missing the point (Score 2, Insightful) 497

by m0nstr42 (#21377211) Attached to: IT's Love-Hate Relationship With Laptops

IT is part of a business. Making IT's job harder in that business costs money. The article is making the point that there are some pretty serious cons about using laptops, and these need to be considered as part of their cost.
Having pissed-off employees who feel chained to their workstation (and consequently horribly unmotivated) can also be a pretty big cost.

IF I HAD A MINE SHAFT, I don't think I would just abandon it. There's got to be a better way. -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.