Any browser that has a "turn off images" feature sounds like fair game to me. Old Netscape had it, don't know if any modern ones do.

It depends on the situation. (Ring.) Or author.

Yeah, but the "I can simulate the 14000-body problem in real time" fad is alive and kicking.

You are dead on. There are quite a few objects out there and a lot of "special" positions they can be in. Also, I don't know if it is really safe for Vulcans, since they might be temporarily blind. The full health implications were never discussed. Macular degeneration at 200 anyone?

This is great. I'll be able avoid ECT.

Don't forget you'll still have to pay your $699....oh wait, wrong evil historical slashdot theme...

That's what I though too when I saw this. The object is basically a bullet. Software crashes and the things decides to go in a straight line to it's home position, you might have a problem.

Right. That was why .xxx was introduced. It opened up so many free "names" as you call them, on the "regular" internet. All those porn names are free for you to use now.

Really, if that was the issue then just using 26 letters in a name and 20 char names gives 26^20 names. That's more than could possibly be needed. So ask yourself, Einstein, what's wrong with your point?

is to opt not to take part. Keep human interaction in teaching. We're headed to a dark ages in education otherwise.

Nothing will happen. Nothing. It's all in your head. This whole fantasy about the numbers is just that - a fantasy.