Rumsfeld Stepping Down 899
macinrack writes to tell us that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, architect of the unpopular war in Iraq, intends to resign after six stormy years at the Pentagon. Officials said Robert Gates, former head of the CIA, would replace Rumsfeld.
Re:Speedy Press (Score:3, Informative)
This is just playing politics. It's just like Pelosi stating she won't start any impeachment. Each party must concede something to get any support from the opposite party. Dems say they won't impeach and Bush gives up Rumsfeld. These people care more about their political games than actually taking a stand on something.
Re:Good timing (Score:4, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Cabine
"Cabinet officers are nominated by the President and then presented to the United States Senate for confirmation or rejection. If approved, they are sworn in, receive the title 'Secretary', and begin their duties."
Re:Wow, talk about bad timing (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Good timing (Score:2, Informative)
And Allen on the Today show 11/8/2000:
The morning after Election Day 2000, when Florida was counting absentee ballots, George Allen said, "we'll need to move America forward as soon as those votes are cast."
Gates and Iran/Contra (Score:5, Informative)
- Walsh Iran / Contra Report [fas.org]
Condescension (Score:5, Informative)
Rumsfeld doesn't "tell it like it is", he uses condescension and (indirect) insults to avoid answering questions he doesn't like. *That* is why people don't like him.
Re:Saddam (Score:3, Informative)
No, it was five years earlier.
1983
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/ [gwu.edu]
1988
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_a
Re:Probably not the only one. Bolton? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good timing (Score:1, Informative)
That's illegal. (Score:2, Informative)
This was the reason Colin Powell became SecState instead of SecDef, because the ten-year rule made it illegal for Powell to be SecDef. It's the same reason Wes Clark, Shinseki, and others cannot legally be SecDef for a very long time yet. Wes Clark can run for president (just as people wanted Powell to run in 1996), but he can't be SecDef until after 2010. Shinseki can't be SecDef until after 2013.
Re:Sore loser (Score:2, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:The sad thing is... (Score:5, Informative)
The Army War College warned against it, General Newbold opposed it, General Shinseki didn't want to do it with that few troops, General Cordingley opposed it in public, and General Zinni of Central COmmand said it was the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time before the invasion.
Re:Sore loser (Score:2, Informative)
It's more likely that he left because Bush recognized that the way the Iraq war was going was the major reason that his party lost the House (and possibly the Senate) and finally decided that he couldn't just stick with the same guys who'd been doing a crappy job this whole time. Like someone else said, Rummy tried to leave a couple of times before... it's just that now, Bush finally had the motivation to let the guy fall on his sword.
WATYF
Re:Not getting over it (Score:4, Informative)
Everyone please read NSArchive article (Score:3, Informative)
Please read the entire article, which includes links to documents showing that the U.S. intelligence new about Saddam using chemical weapons against "kurdish insurgents". The document in question was written in Nov. 1983. They had known about Iraq's use of chemical weapons against the Iranians for longer. Rumsfeld shook hands with Saddam in Dec. 1983.
Which is not to imply that Rumsfeld necessarily knew what Hussein doing, him being an envoy at the time not the Defense Secretary as he was yesterday. Our government did know, though, and sent Rumsfeld on his make-nice mission anyway. Never forget that -- when it was expedient, the government welcomed a genocidal maniac as an ally, and then turned on them when it was convenient. Try to remember when in twenty years you're hearing about the evils of Uzbekistan and the need for 'liberation'.
Re:Rumsfeld was not the architect of the Iraq war (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The more sad thing is... (Score:5, Informative)
Honestly, voting rights in America shouldn't be based on age, they should be based on independence and tax status. Its great being a liberal if someone else's tax money is being spent.
You really need to keep up.
The Republicans are the party of bigger government than even the Democrats and have been for 30 years
They spend more, increase the size of government much more.
Anybody who votes for Republicans for fiscal issues is a delusional moron who hasn't paid a bit of attention to the situation in decades.
I'm just glad Slashdot raised the flag on Diebold (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.digg.com/politics/page3
The boss is still there (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good at war, bad at peace (Score:3, Informative)
I don't recall any declarations of war...
Maybe this will help:
Re:Sore loser (Score:4, Informative)