Transmeta Sues Intel for Patent Infringement 161
Cr0w T. Trollbot writes "Today Transmeta filed suit against Intel for patent infringement. From the article: 'The suit [...] alleges that Intel infringed upon ten of Transmeta's patents. The patents cover computer architecture and power efficiency technologies.' Transmeta offered a low-power x86 processor until last year which used Transmeta's vaunted 'code morphing' software."
Sigh... (Score:5, Interesting)
I used to think they were cool... (Score:5, Interesting)
FTA: "The complaint charges that Intel has infringed and is infringing Transmeta's patents by making and selling a variety of microprocessor products, including at least Intel's Pentium III, Pentium 4, Pentium M, Core and Core 2 product lines."
They sure are going back a long ways...
FTA: "Last year, Transmeta laid off 67 employees in a restructuring plan aimed to focus more heavily on IP and the phase out its less profitable processors."
So they went out of the business of actually making anything (presumably because their products were not competitive in the market place), so NOW they turn to their IP to make any money. I really don't know if they've got a valid case or not, but they certainly seem to be trolling.
Re:I used to think they were cool... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:They still exist? (Score:2, Interesting)
I wonder ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Go figure - too clever (Score:5, Interesting)
Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
Re:anyone think the case might actually have merit (Score:3, Interesting)
In addition, they've got a fair number of engineers working at both Sony and Microsoft, and an Efficeon CPU (with AMD branding) is the only certified processor for the FlexGo program.
The history is that Transmeta has brought out some innovative low-power CPUs, but never seemed to gain any market traction at all.
Yes, I think this case might just well have real merit.
Intel = Deep Pockets (Score:4, Interesting)
If Transmeta scores a win against Intel, then maybe that could lead to licensing agreements with others that may be afraid that they would also lose in litigation. In the meantime, this is one time where AMD may be thankful that they don't have the largest marketshare and the deepest pockets in the CPU industry.
Re:now just another sleezy IP company eh (Score:5, Interesting)
It was well vaunted at their launch that a laptop running a DVD wouldn't last as long on battery as if it were doing word processing.
The fact they didn't catch on isn't relevant to what they contributed to the industry itself.
Re:I used to think they were cool... (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't know how long this business model will survive things like OpenCores - it's even cheaper to download the HDL for a chip for free than buy it - but they may well be successful for a while.
Um, hello? (Score:2, Interesting)
Deffo would make more sense to me than the rumored purchase of nVidia.
Re:Hail Mary Play (Score:2, Interesting)
See the NTP/RIM case -- Transmeta can get a sympathetic judge to grant an injunction while they intentionally drag out the case, possibly forcing the prospect of Intel having to stop all processor sales until the case is settled. Intel will of course cave and just buy the "patents" to eliminate this business risk.
And that is why it's pretty much the opposite of your contention in some cases -- it isn't how much you have to use to fight, but how much you have to lose even if you might eventually win.
Re:Go figure - too clever (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Go figure - too clever (Score:4, Interesting)
Woody Allen.
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, teach gym.
Re:Um, hello? (Score:2, Interesting)