Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Youths No Longer Predominant on MySpace 246

mikesd81 writes "The Associated Press is reporting on the rapid aging of MySpace. More than half of MySpace's users are now 35 or older. From the article: 'Just a year ago, teens under 18 made up about 25 percent of MySpace, the popular online hangout run by News Corp. That's now down to 12 percent in the comScore analysis released Thursday. By contrast, the 35-54 group at MySpace grew to 41 percent in August, from 32 percent a year earlier ... The study was based on comScore's regular panels for measuring Internet audiences, rather than MySpace's registration information, where users often lie about their age.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Youths No Longer Predominant on MySpace

Comments Filter:
  • The Truth (Score:5, Funny)

    by neonprimetime ( 528653 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:13AM (#16336731)
    More predators, less victims.
  • by flynt ( 248848 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:16AM (#16336787)
    Thus proving:

    Myspace: For 14 year old girls and the 40 year old men that love them

    (don't know where i heard this , so i don't take credit)
  • by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:16AM (#16336801)
    > More predators, less victims.

    Wait, are we talking Myspace here, or are we talking Congress?

  • by rubycodez ( 864176 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:18AM (#16336829)
    can't be Congress, they rotate in a fresh crop of nubile young pages every semester
  • by klenwell ( 960296 ) <klenwell@nospaM.gmail.com> on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:18AM (#16336831) Homepage Journal
    More predators, less victims.

    Or more sharks for myspace to wave at as it jumps over them -- depending on how you look at it.
  • by ENOENT ( 25325 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:30AM (#16336985) Homepage Journal
    Supposedly, this company has some method of telling the age of a person based on their MySpace profile. I'm guessing it involves voodoo.

    Or maybe they just assume that everyone who likes Norwegian black metal is 14 years old, everyone who likes Neil Diamond is 57, and everyone else is 39.

  • by GoNINzo ( 32266 ) <GoNINzo.yahoo@com> on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:41AM (#16337129) Journal
    Today, it was discovered Myspace seems to extend life! A recent study today found that there are at least 100,000 people on the site that are reportedly 99 years old. This number of older people seems to indicate that all the 99 year old people in the world are either using Myspace, or it is extending life to that age.

    Tom had no comment other than to say that he's your friend.

  • by aleksiel ( 678251 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:45AM (#16337179)
    the statistics also reveal that an amazing 15% of myspace is apparently 69 years old.
  • Dear God! (Score:5, Funny)

    by jalefkowit ( 101585 ) <jason@jaso3.14nlefkowitz.com minus pi> on Friday October 06, 2006 @11:57AM (#16337331) Homepage

    This can only mean one thing: MySpace users are aging at a faster rate than the rest of us.

    We should look into this. Is there something about ugly HTML that increases the human rate of aging? This really demands further study.

  • by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @12:11PM (#16337511) Journal
    Also, there are few reason for these virtual communities. The whole point of them is to meet people you will never actually meet. Want some social interaction. Try striking up a conversation with somebody, that alwasy seesm to work well for me.


    I'll give you a damn good reason to be on a virtual community (e.g., you're on Slashdot right now) instead of striking a conversation with your good neighbour Jack Random: common interests. E.g., I'd rather talk or read a post about computers, history, or cats, than listen to the local drone go on and on about football (soccer) and cars.

    Frankly, most conversations born out of sheer geographical proximity are fucking boring. There's a whole class of topics that really interest noone that much, like sports or the weather, that exist only as the lowest common denominator for talks between perfect strangers. ("Say, it's cloudy today." Yes, I noticed it, I'm not fucking blind.)

    And people who devote a disproportionate amount of their time just to stay on top of such common denominator topics. E.g., sports. There are plenty of people whose only real interest in sports and in following the prowess of a give team, whether they consciously realize it or not, is only really to seem to belong to the local group of Tom, Dick and Harry who seem interested in that team. Bonus points if it's just groupthink, and deep down inside, Tom, Dick and Harry aren't in it for any other reason either.

    Me, I'd rather find someone and some topic more interesting than that. On the Internet if that's what it takes.

    I'll give you a second one: to stay in touch with old pals. People occasionally do have to move.

    Plus, it's not even something new, and you only need to look at history to see how bogus that argument is. The same could be said for snail mail letters, for example. Here, lemme rephrase it for you: "Also, there are few reason for these letters. The whole point of them is to meet people you will never actually meet. Want some social interaction. Try striking up a conversation with somebody, that alwasy seesm to work well for me."

    And yet, ever since someone inventing writing on a stone or clay tablet, people have used them to communicate with other people, some they'll likely never meet in person. All sorts of people, including philosophers, novelists, playwrights, statesmen, etc, yes, have often enough preferred to spend an evening writing a letter to an old friend or to someone with similar interests, instead of just going out and striking a random conversation about the weather. For the most famous ones you can even go to the local book store or library and buy a a book or three with transcripts of their correspondence. Those alone would make a nice mountain of evidence that people occasionally do want to socialize with someone more interesting than the locally available Joe and Jane Random. Go figure.
  • by Hogwash McFly ( 678207 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @12:19PM (#16337637)
    Did you hear about the congressman who lost his bookmark?

    He bent a page over.
  • by quanticle ( 843097 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @12:22PM (#16337671) Homepage
    What's the difference between the Library of Congress and Congress?

    The Library doesn't let you lick the pages.
  • by Rob T Firefly ( 844560 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @12:29PM (#16337795) Homepage Journal
    ..think of the adults!!
  • by StandardDeviant ( 122674 ) on Friday October 06, 2006 @01:44PM (#16338937) Homepage Journal
    It seems that the Foleygate scandal has the Republican House leadership in such disarray that they're having problems staying on the same Page.
  • by BenEnglishAtHome ( 449670 ) * on Friday October 06, 2006 @01:49PM (#16339005)
    ...isn't cool anymore? Just because I'm a 40+ year old white guy who raps an obscene, extended version of "The Ballad of the Beverly Hillbillies" explaining in detail the relationship between Ellie Mae and all those animals and thinks I'm being funny while I do it, we've reached the point where rap isn't cool?

    Damn it all to hell.

    I worked hard on that song. A couple of drunk crowds at comedy clubs have loved at it. I guess now I'll have to ditch it from the act.

    Damn.

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...