Space Elevator vs Wildlife 307
An anonymous reader writes "The longest test yet of the technology that might one day lead to space elevators has revealed some unusual problems. From the article: "There were several unexpected encounters with wildlife. More than a dozen insect egg colonies had been laid on the tether and curious bats flew around the balloons, apparently attracted by the sound made by the tether's vibrations. Late in the test, swallows were also seen swooping down on the balloons, possibly to sip the morning dew on their surfaces." Maybe all the critters just want to go to space too."
Other issues and possible resolution (Score:5, Interesting)
Like the static we discharge walking around the office, any critters setting up home will be in for a nasty shock.
Buckle and deformation problems (Score:5, Interesting)
Hm... do you think that if your tether is beginning to BUCKLE AND DEFORM, you might have a slightly more fundamental problem than just needing to redesign the robot?
Well, I'm sure they're aware of it. But this kind of thing probably won't become more obvious until they do a 6-month test, I guess. Or 6-years. But the potential for your tether to break off eventually is probably going to be a slight drawback.
60,000 mile tether - not possible (Score:2, Interesting)
A space elevator sounds great, it just seems far-fetched. A 100 meter test. Only 96,560,540 more meters to go.
Ants (Score:5, Interesting)
Assuming ants can climb up the elevator, I wonder which altitude they could reach, given the fact that they supposedly don't need a lot of oxygen with their small bodies. (I know that ants don't have lungs and breathe through tiny pores, but still)
Re:Just goes to show... (Score:2, Interesting)
Since this is an inappropriate mod thread I expect to become interesting.
Re:Buckle and deformation problems (Score:3, Interesting)
Nothing but space, though none of it empty (Score:3, Interesting)
I wrote a paper about this once. [west.net]
The entire universe is "vacuum" if by "vacuum" you mean the absence of "solid, extended" matter.
Matter isn't solid. It's make of loosely bound atoms. Even atoms aren't solid. They're tiny nuclei surrounded by lots of "empty" space, filled only with infinitesimal electrons (i.e. point-particles, with a size of precisely zero) and the forces they exert. Those forces are what keep other atoms from occupying the same space, and what give the atoms the appearance of being solid. We all know that much around here.
But the nuclei themselves are composed of separate nucleons bound together by nuclear forces, and it's just those forces which keep nuclei from occupying the same space, same as the electromagnetic force keeps atoms "solid". Inside the nucleus is still more "empty" space.
But those nucleons themselves are just bundles of quarks held together by still different nuclear forces.
Quarks, however, are infinitesimal point-particles, just like electrons. They occupy no space; they're just points of zero extension.
Nothing in the universe is "extended", and things are only "solid" to the point that nothing below a certain energy threshold can overcome the forces keeping things out of a certain part of space, i.e. "solid" is relative. There's just infinitesimal point-particles and the interactions (forces) between them. The rest of it is "empty" space. Though as that space is universally permeated by the forces of those point-particles (there's electromagnetic fields, albiet sometimes very weak, everywhere in the universe), and has effects of it's own (e.g. gravity, which also permeates the entire universe), it can hardly be called empty.
Re:What about Airplanes? (Score:4, Interesting)
I would bet this has already been thought of, but I'd be curious to see what came of these thoughts?
Re:robot tests are dumb (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm a system administrator at Liftport, yes. Which is part of why I was polite. But mostly 'polite' is my default mode.
Also, you never can tell - maybe the guy is a frickin' engineering Einstein and just isn't able to fully spread his creative wings wherever he is.