*you* read the paper.
From your link (emphasis mine):
In conclusion, despite the large significance of the measurement reported here and the
robustness of the analysis, the potentially great impact of the result motivates the continuation of
our studies in order to investigate possible still unknown systematic effects that could explain the
observed anomaly. We deliberately do not attempt any theoretical or phenomenological
interpretation of the results.
They specifically did not make the claim that neutrinos were travelling faster than light. The paper actually contains a lot of detail, and they were asking for ideas on what they might have missed. Did you read past the abstract?