Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Charge in 5 minutes, Drive 500 miles? 319

ctroutwi writes "In the wake of rising gasoline costs there have been plenty of alternatives seen on the horizon. Including Hybrids, Biofuels, fuel cells and battery powered all electric cars. CNN has recently posted a story about a company (EEStor) that plans on offering Ultra-Capacitor storage products. The claim being that you charge the ultra-capacitor in 5 minutes, with approximately 9$ (~$.45 a gallon) of electricity and then drive 500 miles."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Charge in 5 minutes, Drive 500 miles?

Comments Filter:
  • by Speare ( 84249 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @07:49AM (#16197421) Homepage Journal

    Yeah, I expect there are a bunch of comments to this effect about the dupe.

    What I'm wondering is why these guys call themselves editors. I'm frustrated that ad revenue and subscription fees go to these people who totally disregard all semblance of professionalism. I wish I had a cushy job like that, where I could sit back, press 'Accept' once in a while without even reading the blurb or the front page, and get paid for it.

  • by BasilBrush ( 643681 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @08:07AM (#16197555)
    Also, I doubt they're hooking it to a regular outlet if they're getting $9 of electricity out of it in five minutes. Granted, you could make charge stations that are similar to gas stations (or add them to gas stations) but you really should list all the materials we would need when considering the cost of this alternative.

    You mean like the "electrical energy stations" mentioned in TFA, from which a 5 minute charge may be obtained?

  • Re:Echo (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @08:14AM (#16197617)
    It's fairly obvious that /. editors don't even read /.
  • by Ancient_Hacker ( 751168 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @08:57AM (#16197941)
    Er, Um, all these comments, and nobody tried doing the math?

    A capacitor bank to store that much charge (100 to 200 KwH) is going to cost, retail, at today's prices, oh, about $220,000 to $440,000 AND take up most of the space inside a minivan. . It's unlikely these folks have made that much of an improvement in cost and density.

    That much energy stored in a capacitor bank will make Jerry Brukheimer really envious-- every such car out there will explode on impact.

    Most houses are only wired for 100 to 200 amps at 120VAC, which scientists tell us, is only 24KwH per hour. Every house would have to be rewired from the power pole with wire two to five times as thick. And a fusebox and timer able to schedule your time sucking up the amps.

    If EVERYBODY tried to do this, we'd need three to five times the available electic power. No way this can happen, there isnt that much available capital in the whole world to build that many power plants. And oh, those power plats would have to use nuclear or coal, not exactly "clean energy" in the broad view.

  • by CmdrPorno ( 115048 ) * on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @09:03AM (#16198001)
    Agreed... There also needs to be some sort of accountability so that the first person to submit a story gets some sort of credit for it, even if their summary isn't used, as opposed to the current random system.

    In the words of one of my friends, "Slashdot is dead to me." Personally, I am loyal to things long after they start sucking, so I'll probably be here a while longer.
  • by TrisexualPuppy ( 976893 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @09:12AM (#16198083)
    500 miles? Let us say the hybrid has the efficiency similar to Prius, 50 MPG. To go 500 miles you need to store as much energy as there is in 10 gallons of gasoline. 10 gallons of gas, is 37.5 litres of gas, that is 30 Kg of gas.

    Energy content of gasoline is 45 MJ/Kg. That means you are storing 1.35e09 Joules of energy. You are charging it in 5 minutes? So dividing by 300 seconds, the Power rating for the charger is 4500000 Watts or 4.5 MW. If you try to charge it from your friendly neighbourhood 110V line, the amp rating for the plug is drum roll please, 40909 Amps

    Now think when you are pumping 25 gallons of gas into that Hummer in 3 minutes, you have a 8 MW device in your hands!
  • But to be fair... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Jerf ( 17166 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @10:01AM (#16198657) Journal
    But to be fair, is it just me or have they been doing a lot better lately? Certainly I've noticed fewer, and I've appreciated it.

    I know it's more fun to bitch about people, but you ought to hand out some kudos every once in a while too. We could do with a bit more of that on the Intarweb.
  • by Jerf ( 17166 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @10:44AM (#16199215) Journal
    Doing the bare minimum at your job is not a praiseable accomplishment.
    Improvement is.

    If you emit nothing but negative feedback, if even improvement is met with negative feedback because the improvement doesn't make it to "perfection" or some other standard, the psychological result is as predictable as the sun rising tomorrow: Lack of interest in continuing to try and ever diminishing performance. It's a bit odd that anybody thinks relentless negativity can have any other effect. (But there are entire major ideologies currently built around this very idea, that a tarnished but pretty good product is so, so very bad that letting blackest evil win is preferable; identifying which is left as an exercise for the reader.)

    Extra double bonus points for continually raising the putative bar every time someone comes close, and continuing to emit nothing but negative feedback. Triple bonus points for being even more critical as improvements are made and the remaining imperfections stand out that much more clearly.
  • by Rogerborg ( 306625 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @10:45AM (#16199227) Homepage
    Meh, they serve as many ads to people ranting about the dupe as they do to people reading the original. It's all good.
  • by Sleepy ( 4551 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @10:56AM (#16199409) Homepage
    Slashdot editorial operations is a good old boy buddy system. I've been with this site since it was .org, and I remember the fuss when people's postings were DELETED because they indicated shall we say "room for improvement" with the site.

    Editors used to have recursive macro's to apply -1 moderation to controversial posts, so even if 50 users moderated something up the post would tank.

    Today I think it's more benign editor abuse -- they simply MISUSE the "friend or foe" system so they can sometimes publish their friend's postings first. Sometimes they publish a sensational headline from someone who registered for Slashdot THAT SAME DAY.

    There's no weighting for how long you've been registered, and how much you have participated. I must have a black mark on my account "never allow to moderate", so I stopped participating here. No metamoderation anymore. There's no need to fork /. - it's just an automated news blog and there are better codebases for this.

    I happen to like the Digg site (although they are going the way of "big self-hype like Slashdot" so some foolish dot-com investor can buy Digg for one MILLION dollars).
  • It's a capacitor (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @11:04AM (#16199577) Journal
    If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... I don't know about you, but my guess would be that maybe it's not a fish. In this case, if it "acts like a capacitor", then it _is_ a capacitor.

    In fact, if you RTFP (Read The F***ing Patent), it _is_ a fancy capacitor, plus circuitry to get a constant voltage out of it. In fact, it's downright the most classical kind of a capacitor, with two surfaces separated by a thin dielectric material. Only they use a fine powder to achieve lots of surface.

    So, yes, it _is_ a capacitor.

    At any rate, if it "acts like a capacitor" then it's fair to compare it to the best ultra-capacitors available. And if what they're proposing ends up having to be 80 times better than the best existing ultra-capacitors, then I'm getting a tad suspicious. Sure, it could be that they're geniuses, but I'll hold the celebrations until I hear something about a working prototype.
  • Re:900KW (Score:3, Insightful)

    by AK Marc ( 707885 ) on Tuesday September 26, 2006 @11:41AM (#16200135)
    Why does everyone get all stuck on what it would take to charge it? That's the easy part. What we are missing for electric cars is exactly this type of storage. Cost was never a problem (except for replacement, which this fixes). The issue was weight, range, and recharge time. Lead acid sucked for mobile applications. Lead isn't light, and neither is water. The batteries for the EV-1 were somewhere around half the weight of the car. Take the 1000+ lbs of batteries and change them to 100 lbs of capacitors, and you have suddenly increased efficiency, handling, ride, and helped with other design considerations. Make it so the very expensive battery plant will last forever, and you shut up all the people whining about the hybrids sucking for long term maintenance.

    That leaves the two complaints: It will be bad in a crash, and it can't charge as fast as theroretically possible. You are on knee-jerk #2. The answer to that is, the grid *will* be improved to handle the load, as it always has been in the past for all other loads. Yes, California has enough power, they just don't have the agreements in place necessary to get the power where it needs to be sometimes. And, I can think of at least one way to charge this thing in 5 minutes off house power, with no modifications to the power line coming into the house. If you can't, the statement out of your mouth shouldn't be "It's impossible" it should be "I'm glad they took this step forward, I hope to see a implimentation that's house-wiring friendly." Just because you can't think of it does not mean it is impossible or even difficult.

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...