Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Integrate iPod with Car or Risk Death 200

An anonymous reader writes "CNET has talked to Apple about its big plans for the car. Apple say they're keen to save the lives of anyone who risks death by "reaching into the footwell of his car to retrieve an iPod nano at around 90mph" and anyone who "considered skipping tracks on his iPod more important than the lives of multiple humans". Apple are also said to be "delighted by the efforts of Mac users who retrofit the Mac Mini into cars" and are "keeping an eye on what these hackers are up to with their Macs." The writer also pitched his own design ideas to Apple's director of global product marketing, Bob Borchers: "We suggested to Borchers that Apple should allow drivers to use their car steering wheel as a giant Clickwheel interface, so that you can change tracks by changing lanes. Borchers foresaw certain safety problems with such a device and rejected the concept.""
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Integrate iPod with Car or Risk Death

Comments Filter:
  • by plover ( 150551 ) * on Monday July 17, 2006 @11:21AM (#15731578) Homepage Journal
    a driver who nearly killed us recently by reaching into the footwell of his car to retrieve an iPod nano at around 90mph.

    You can kill someone by just focusing on the stereo display instead of the road, too. This guy was just more Darwinian than most.

    Perhaps car stereos need to be rubber-padded to accomodate the lowest common denominator, like so many other consumer products. Something to prevent you from changing discs, tracks or stations unless the transmission is in park.

  • by LoudMusic ( 199347 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @11:27AM (#15731608)
    I know a lot of manufacturers have started including iPod connections in the glovebox with stereo's equipped with direct control of the gadget, but has anyone made a headunit with a cassette-like bay for the iPod? It would be like, retro cool. I guess the problem comes with the different form factors of all the different iPods, but I suppose they could include various shims.
  • by b1t r0t ( 216468 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @11:42AM (#15731737)

    ...I just grab the wire that's attached to it and start pulling. I use a lighter plug charger which has an audio-out jack on the charger plug, and the cassette adapter plugs into that. Ergonomically, it's like using a wired remote, only the music is in the "remote" itself. It cost a bit more for this than the other cheapie brands that don't have an audio jack, but I had already been using an MP3 CD player for a few years and was never happy with two wires to the player constantly getting tangled.

    And why has it taken car stereo manufacturers so long to put input jacks on the damn things anyhow? Mine is seven years old, and I'm not too aware of what the norm is now. For all I know, they still aren't including input jacks. Cassette adapters are an ugly workaround that shouldn't be necessary, and FM transmitters are usually too weak or imprecise.

  • by tgd ( 2822 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @11:42AM (#15731744)
    Mopar (Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep/etc) has a system that gives iPod control to most of their vehicle's radios over the last five or so years.

    The problem is, it doesn't work. They claim it works with all Dock iPods, and explicitly list all of them, but it just plain doesn't work with any 3G iPods. The radio comes up and says to update the firmware on the iPod. Of course 3G iPods haven't gotten any updates in a LONG time.

    My girlfriends Mini (4G?) works with it... sort of. Only half the albums, artists or playlists show up... even if those songs play just fine in a playlist that references them.

    It remains to be seen if later iPods actually work as advertised. The problem is, these products are not well supported (or supported at all). An iPod cable is a different beast from most car accessories or features. A quick search through various car support forums makes it sound like the problem is pretty common -- these non-Apple integrations sometimes work great, sometimes work some, and sometimes just don't work.

    Caveat Emptor.
  • Re:Footwell? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by kannibal_klown ( 531544 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @11:54AM (#15731830)
    I remember back when I'd leav my discman on the passenger seat (as it was too big for the cup holder). That thing was always falling into the footwell on sharp turns and such. But I never-ever-ever attempted to reach down and pick it up while driving: that would be insane (and possibly fatal).

    It could have simply been the guy wasn't thinking clearly that one time. It's happened to me dozens of times where I won't be thinking and will do something incredibly stupid that I'd never do under normal circumstances. But I like to think that this is limited to putting the organge-juice carton in the dish washer and not doing something that could lead to my death.
  • I have a solution (Score:3, Interesting)

    by davidwr ( 791652 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @12:00PM (#15731866) Homepage Journal
    Ban ipods, radios, phones, noisy kids, and all other distractions from automobiles.

    There, we can all drive safer now.

    Rule #1 of iPod safety: People reaching for their iPods don't cause car accidents. Idiots reaching for their iPods do.
    Corrollary to rule #1: Anyone causing an accident while reaching for his iPod is an idiot.
  • by steveo777 ( 183629 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @12:29PM (#15732099) Homepage Journal
    I don't have any links, but a few manufacturers attempted to heed the calls of people who wanted to play their LPs on the road. None were sucesseful for a few reasons. Suspension tech was pretty bad and the roads were worse. There was no way to have a record play continuously over anything but perfect driving conditions. Applying more force on the arm broke needls over the bumps and occationally damaged the vinyl.
  • by The Snowman ( 116231 ) * on Monday July 17, 2006 @02:08PM (#15732280)

    I rarely talk on the phone while driving. I only do so if the call can't wait and there is little to no traffic. Even then I find the extra gadget distracting. My MP3 player is conveniently located within a finger's reach when I have my hand on the gearshift, so as long as I'm in 1st, 3rd, or 5th gear I barely have to glance at it to change volume or tracks. Talking on a cell phone with a manual transmission is a bit tougher, which is partly why I don't like talking on it while driving. Headsets aren't a problem for me as long as I get the call set up while I'm stopped.

    I think the key is knowing your limits. I know that trying to keep a phone on my head in the right spot to hear it while turning the wheel and shifting gears is more than I can handle, so I don't do it. I know my truck can't take corners well, so I have to slow down. I know my car can take the corners with its front wheel drive. I know I can talk easier on a cell phone in my (automatic) car, so my limit there is a little more relaxed.

    Every day I see counterexamples, though. People driving big SUVs like sportscars when they can't corner and can't handle like one. Talking on cell phones in heavy traffic. Eating while driving in heavy traffic. Et al. This is a driver problem, not a gadget problem.

  • by mozumder ( 178398 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @02:48PM (#15732649)
    Unfortunately, so far, the best controller for an iPod I've seen is still the iPod itself. All the iPod interfaces to car-stereo unit's I've seen use the car's head unit as the controller for the iPod, including setting up playlists and what not. This isn't practical with a 60GB iPod loaded with tens of thousands of tracks and hundreds of playlists.

    Just place the iPod near the steering wheel, use that as the controller for the tracks and playlists, and forget about all the horrible interfaces in the head-unit. It should only be connected with an Aux cable for audio. Actually, a bluetooth interface for audio transfer to the car would even be better, since there's no cable. Need apple to come up with a bluetooth equipped iPod, though.
  • by Kludge ( 13653 ) on Monday July 17, 2006 @03:21PM (#15732886)
    The placement of the controls isn't the problem. The visibility of the controls isn't the problem. The driver who thinks he can drive the radio and the car at the same time is the problem.
    Driver distractions in general are the problem.


    No, the problem is that cars are driven by human beings who are inherently fallible. This is very old, but poor technology. Even if every distraction/impediment is eliminated, more people still will die from traffic accidents than any other preventable form of death.

  • by plover ( 150551 ) * on Monday July 17, 2006 @03:25PM (#15732925) Homepage Journal
    Well, my phone really is 99.5% hands free -- it's a bluetooth kit hooked into the stereo. I press a single button on the dash to answer it. Even with all that, I find the distraction of an ordinary conversation draws some focus from the primary job of driving the vehicle.

    It's a bit worse than talking to an adult passenger, because a passenger is usually aware of the road conditions and will shut up at the appropriate time, and will understand when your concentration needs to be fully on the road. People on the other end of the cell call usually don't recognize that I'm driving and certainly aren't aware of my traffic situation. Occasionally I have to butt in with a "Sorry, I'm driving and there's a problem, could you hang on a moment?" The other party is almost universally accepting of this -- if you bother to tell them. But I remember at least one occasion where traffic was tight, and my boss just wouldn't shut up, so I hung up on him. Yeah, that's why I hung up.

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...