Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Bio-diesel Made from Sewage 322

tito writes "A New Zealand company has successfully turned sewage into modern-day gold. New Zealand Herald is reporting that a Marlborough-based Aquaflow Bionomic yesterday announced it had produced its first sample of bio-diesel fuel from algae in sewage ponds. It is believed to be the world's first commercial production of bio-diesel from 'wild' algae outside the laboratory - and the company expects to be producing at the rate of at least one million litres of the fuel each year from Blenheim by April."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bio-diesel Made from Sewage

Comments Filter:
  • by IDontAgreeWithYou ( 829067 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @07:47AM (#15316387)
    E85 != Biodiesel.

    E85 is ethanol.
    Biodiesel is ... well... biologically produced diesel fuel.
  • by flafish ( 305068 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @07:49AM (#15316395)
    Only reason E-85 costs more in the US is because we make it with corn instead of sugar cane. Brazil based theirs on cane and produce it for about half what it costs for gasoline.
  • by Whiney Mac Fanboy ( 963289 ) * <whineymacfanboy@gmail.com> on Friday May 12, 2006 @07:57AM (#15316420) Homepage Journal
    How much is that compared to the oil consumption of New Zealand? How many of those factories would be needed to be independent of crude oil and would that be feasible?

    NZ consumes around 151,900 blue barrels a day [cia.gov] that's around 8815 million litres a year. So this plant will be able to provide around 0.01% of NZ's fuel.

    But, there is going to be no single replacement for fossil fuels, there's going to be many (and this is just the first plant).

    I wish Aquaflow Bionomics Corporation's [bio-diesel.co.nz] home page was a little more professional looking, but this is most certainly good news!
  • E85 won't save money (Score:2, Informative)

    by EBFoxbat ( 897297 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @07:59AM (#15316428)
    Not that this is the reason for using it... but most cars on the road now that can run e85 will not be savign money. e85 is a bit cheaper and your milage is a bit less. The savings (there is some) will be very little. The implications of cutting our oil consumption (from gasoline) by 75 % is HUGE. It's just not a financial thing.
  • As well as creating diesel from waste products, the process cleans water...
    Correct you are, I was searching around for that local government's PDF on their sewage ponds. I was wondering what the area of pond was exposed to air and whether or not this had any ill effects on residents. What I found was an interesting abstract from the Assets & Services List of the Marlborough District [marlborough.govt.nz] and from P.04/05.665:
    In a report presented by Mark Wheeler he advised that residents in the Dillons Point and Hardings Road area had recently been experiencing sewage odour problems. These odours occur when treatment pond dissolved oxygen levels are insufficient to break down the organic wastes. The odour problem had followed this year's wine vintage when the ponds receive their annual peak organic loading.

    Growth in wine processing in the Riverlands and Cloudy Bay industrial areas had been forecast. It was noted that winery growth was a key factor in Council's decision to purchase the former PPCS sewerage and water assets. However the speed of that growth and the consequent additional loadings created had exceeded expectations.
    Perhaps that algae will also help solve the problem of the annual wine dumpings?

    I still haven't found anything that states how large an area/volume of pond they must have in order to produce one million litres/year. It is also interesting to note that they require aerating the pond ... how much electricity that consumes, I'm not sure ...
  • The UNH Study (Score:5, Informative)

    by Zobeid ( 314469 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @08:15AM (#15316466)
    The UNH Biodiesel Group calculated that algae farms in the Mojave Desert alone could supply enough fuel to replace all the gasoline used in the USA. That was just an example to show the land-area requirements. In practice you would want algae cultivation spread out around the country. (The availability of waste feedstocks around the country is one reason.)

    I like biodiesel as a long-term solution for several reasons. . .

    Because an air-breathing engine draws much of its "fuel" mass from the air, it starts with a large advantage in energy density, and it will be hard for other energy sources -- batteries, supercapacitors, flywheels -- to ever compete.

    Unlike hydrogen, we already have the infrastructure in place to handle, store and distribute biodiesel, and millions of vehicles that can already run off it, and the capacity to economically produce millions more of them.

    Producing it from algae mimics the process by which petroleum originally formed, over the eons. It might seem unrealistic to produce enough biofuel on a year-by-year basis to replace the *millions* of years worth of petroleum that we routinely burn without thinking anything of it. . . But the natural processes that created petroleum were haphazard, and hardly what anyone would call efficient.

    If you replace haphazard processes with specially selected (maybe genetically engineered) strains of algae kept in controlled conditions, with concentrated feed of nutrients and sunlight, the production capacity could be immense. So yeah, I think it can be done.

    We might not ever see dirt-cheap fuel again, but I'm optimistic that we can come up with petroleum alternatives at a level that allows our economy and industry to keep on functioning.
  • by caston ( 711568 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @08:24AM (#15316492)
    Brazil has cheap labor and the production is subsidized by their government. You don't really want to run a car on ethanol because your service costs will go up and you'll soon stuff the engine.
  • Re:1 million litres? (Score:5, Informative)

    by awilden ( 110846 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @08:31AM (#15316527)
    I think you mean switch to sugar cane since it's 8x more efficient than corn. Corn is what we already have, and sugar is what Brazil is using right now.
  • by Patrik_AKA_RedX ( 624423 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @08:36AM (#15316545) Journal
    Biofuel would be less likely te be as heavily taxed over here
    Not heavily taxed? Obviously you don't live in Belgium.
  • by dorbabil ( 969458 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @08:38AM (#15316553)
    TDP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_depolymerizat ion [wikipedia.org] produces light crude, not biodiesel. It'd work just fine on sewage, in addition to pretty much anything else that contains any lipids, plastics, gums, rubbers, etc. Long carbon chains, basically. I keep my eye on the company and technology, and am extremely disapointed that the only commercial plant up and running so far is only pumping out approximately 800,000 gallons per year from waste (turkey offal) that's not actually waste because the US government hasn't outlawed using animal products as animal feed.
  • Re:1 million litres? (Score:3, Informative)

    by TykeClone ( 668449 ) * <TykeClone@gmail.com> on Friday May 12, 2006 @08:39AM (#15316558) Homepage Journal
    There's a corn-fuled ethanol producing plant in Kansas that produces 26 million gal of ethanol a year

    That's a small one. I live less than 20 miles from one that is currently making 100 million gallons per year - and it will be doubled in capacity within the next year.

  • by Xichekolas ( 908635 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @08:43AM (#15316582)

    According to the UNH study and Wikipedia [wikipedia.org], the yield of algae farms is about 5000 to 20,000 gallons per acre of pond per year. This number varies mostly due to the pond conditions, strain of algae used, and oil collection method employed.

    However, it is worthwhile to note that even the low end (5000 gallons per acre per year) is over 100 times better than soybeans (50 gallons per acre per year) or rapeseed (about 120 gallons per acre per year)... which are the two dominant crops providing biodiesel in America and Europe today.

    To supply the entire US fuel needs would require as little as 0.3% of US land area to be covered by algae ponds. This translates to about 28,000 square kilometers, or about 11,000 square miles. To put this in perspective, that is about 1/8th the size of Kansas... and well less than the area devoted to Soybeans currently.

  • Re:1 million litres? (Score:3, Informative)

    by Mark_in_Brazil ( 537925 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @09:00AM (#15316670)
    If we were smart we would pull a brazil and start producing more corn to use as ethanol. They will be oil-independent by next year. Sugar-based ethanol is something like 8 times more efficient then corn-based. Shows what we know right?
    To "pull a Brazil," the USA would have to do a lot of things, and I don't think producing more corn would be one of them.
    First, as the parent post notes, getting ethanol from sugar cane, as Brazil does, is much more efficient than getting ethanol from corn. With corn, depending on which estimates you believe, the energy you can get from burning the ethanol you get is anywhere from 0.8 to 1.3 times the amount of energy you put in to get the ethanol. With sugar cane, the ratio is about 8.
    It is true that Brazil has major ethanol production from sugar cane, but Brazil is not going to be oil-independent by next year. However, Brazil is already independent of foreign petroleum right now . Brazil has its own petroleum and makes a lot of use of ethanol and natural gas. The situation in Bolivia complicates natural gas, but Brazil actually has its own natural gas too. Further, 96% of Brazil's electrical energy comes from hydroelectric plants (dams). Additionally, Brazil, a tropical country, does not have the heating needs a country like the USA does in the winter. Yes, in the south it can get down to freezing occasionally in the winter, and yes, I can tell you the mornings in São Paulo have been a bit chilly for the last several days (it's Autumn here now), but that's nothing compared to places where the temperature can be below freezing for months on end. The lowest overnight low I've ever seen in São Paulo was in the low 40s. I don't even have a heater in my apartment in São Paulo (tho' I do have an electric blanket I sometimes turn on for about 10 minutes to warm the bed before I get in it on the coldest nights of the winter... FWIW, the electric blanket isn't even on my bed right now). Yes, it's nice to have air conditioning in the summer, but for example, my apartment does not. My car does, and I feel any office that would ever require me to wear a suit better damn well have air conditioning, but it is possible to get by without it. Try getting through a Chicago, Minneapolis, or even New York or Boston winter without heat. Yikes!
    And Brazil is a growing economic power, with major manufacturing, agricultural, mining, banking, and technology concerns. This is not just a bunch of peasants out in the fields, as anyone who has visited the megalopolis of greater São Paulo can attest. The fact that Brazil does not depend on foreign petroleum and is very close to being completely energy independent. Bolivian natural gas seems to be the last bit of dependence, and Evo Morales may end up forcing Brazil to accelerate development of its own natural gas resouces.
    Brazil's government should be congratulated for having the vision and the drive to make Brazil independent of foreign petroleum.
  • Re:The UNH Study (Score:4, Informative)

    by MtViewGuy ( 197597 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @09:51AM (#15316933)
    If you replace haphazard processes with specially selected (maybe genetically engineered) strains of algae kept in controlled conditions, with concentrated feed of nutrients and sunlight, the production capacity could be immense. So yeah, I think it can be done.

    In fact, that is what a company called GreenFuel Technologies wants to do. Put up a couple of hundred acres of special vertical tanks (maybe derived from metal tanks used by large commercial breweries) and feed the tanks full of oil-laden algae with the exhaust gases from a coal-fired or natural gas-fired plant. This results in VERY fast growth of the algae and also absorbs 40% of the CO2 gas and 86% of the NOx gases, with the final exhaust gases having way below the Kyoto Protocol mandates for coal-fired powerplant emissions. Just a single 200-acre setup could produce an astonishing 15 million gallons of biodiesel fuel/heating oil per year, and the "waste" from the processing of the algae could be used to make animal feed, plant fertilizer or even make ethanol! :-)

    If we set up such "farms" of algae tanks next to every large coal-fired or natural gas-fired plant in the USA we could make enough biodiesel fuel/heating oil to drastically reduce the need for refining diesel fuel or heating oil from crude oil. Given modern catalytic "cracker" technology at most US refineries this means more of the crude oil can be used to make gasoline and/or kerosene motor fuels.
  • HEMP for bio-diesel (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anon-Admin ( 443764 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @10:15AM (#15317113) Journal
    I still think that HEMP is the way to go.

    From 1 acre of hemp you can produce

    1300 gal of bio diesel
    The equivalent amount of paper as 10 acre's of trees
    The equivalent of 5 acres of cotton in cloth.
    Hemp Seed flower (For cake, bread, etc)
    and
    Pulp products that can replace cardboard and many plastic products.

    This is from the different parts of the plant. That means that you get ALL of them at the same time. Not just growing corn for fuel and throw away the rest.
  • by bhtooefr ( 649901 ) <[gro.rfeoothb] [ta] [rfeoothb]> on Friday May 12, 2006 @10:31AM (#15317250) Homepage Journal
    Just to clarify, biodiesel and veggie oil are NOT the same. Biodiesel is a type of synthetic diesel fuel made from a renewable resource, whereas veggie oil, while it can be run in a diesel engine (with modifications), is somewhat different, and much more viscuous.

    That said, the tricky part with getting above 10% biofuels is not with biodiesel in diesels - modern diesels (1995 and newer) can handle 100% without much problem at all. And older diesels just need fuel lines replaced with urethane or Viton lines.

    The tricky part is ethanol in gassers. The fuel system components often have a difficult time dealing with ethanol, and the fuel is different enough from gasoline that the engine must be optimized for ethanol to run well on it. (See the "flex-fuel" cars nowadays in the US, that are merely normal gasoline-powered cars with extra sensors... they get 30% less economy on 85% ethanol...)
  • Re:1 million litres? (Score:5, Informative)

    by bourne ( 539955 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @10:32AM (#15317273)
    1 Million litres may be a decent start, but it sure isn't much. There's a corn-fuled ethanol producing plant in Kansas that produces 26 million gal of ethanol a year, and that hardly makes a dent

    I'm not sure I see your point. You're saying we'd need to find 26 municipalities with wastewater treatment plants to convert to algae farms, which would be part of the requisite wastewater treatment solution as well as producing fuel, in order to match one plant which requires farmers to go out and actively produce feedstock for at added expense? That's more than just 'decent' in my book. And imagine what your municipality would say if you told them they could offset the costs of fuel and wastewater treatment at the same time - ka-ching!

    If we were smart we would pull a brazil and start producing more corn to use as ethanol. They will be oil-independent by next year. Sugar-based ethanol is something like 8 times more efficient then corn-based. Shows what we know right?

    Taking advantage of existing feedstock (read: waste) beats growing feedstock for most efficiencies. And if you want to look for more viable biodiesel feedstocks, there's a wide number - rapeseed, mustard, jatropha, and palm oil. See the table at Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]. Note that algae wins hands down over crops.

  • by TheAxeMaster ( 762000 ) on Friday May 12, 2006 @10:41AM (#15317391)
    So, the sewage output of a town of 26,000 people can produce 1 million litres of usable fuel. As it was stated above, NZ consumes around 8.8 billion liters of fuel per year. With a population of 4.1 million, that is ~2150 liters of fuel, per person, per year. This plant is producing around 38 litres per person. So they've covered roughly 2% of the fuel use per person. Granted, 2% isn't much, but it is locally produced (removing most of the transportation inefficiencies) and I'm sure it isn't as optimal as it is going to get. It is a start at least. And say you get it to 10%, well that is 10% from something that has just been an eyesore previously.
     
    And that is actually quite a lot of fuel per person. That's around 11 US gallons PER WEEK. I myself use about half that much (I live in the US), so a little energy consumption curbing in NZ could make a large impact on the percentage.
  • Re:Nothing new (Score:3, Informative)

    by bhtooefr ( 649901 ) <[gro.rfeoothb] [ta] [rfeoothb]> on Friday May 12, 2006 @10:43AM (#15317408) Homepage Journal
    On a serious note, I usually fill my Jetta up with a premium diesel that I have been told is 50 cetane (opposite of octane, and with diesel, the higher, the better - 40 cetane is normal), and is one of the better premium diesels in the country.

    (I've been told it's BP Diesel Supreme, which is refined right here in Ohio, and made from 0% Middle Eastern oil. :))

    And, I plan on running homebrew biodiesel in the future, as well. :)
  • Re:Nothing new (Score:3, Informative)

    by bhtooefr ( 649901 ) <[gro.rfeoothb] [ta] [rfeoothb]> on Friday May 12, 2006 @01:40PM (#15319375) Homepage Journal
    Biodiesel that has been properly produced (that means drying it after washing it) does NOT contain water.

    It IS hygroscopic (attracts water), but an additive will take care of that - and, so is regular petroleum diesel, for that matter. Using it quickly, or not letting it sit in a container that air can get in, solves that problem, as well.

    BTW, fuel tanks on most diesel cars are plastic. Even on my Jetta, which is a 1985, I have a plastic tank.

    Check the following sites:

    http://www.biodieselnow.com/ [biodieselnow.com]
    http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/ [infopop.cc]
    http://forums.tdiclub.com/forumdisplay.php?f=52 [tdiclub.com] (centric to modern VW diesels)

Old programmers never die, they just hit account block limit.

Working...