Vintage Diseases Making a Comeback 403
An anonymous reader writes "MSNBC has a piece on a recent resurgence in some old-timey diseases. Mumps, Whooping Cough, and Rickets are making a comeback, back in style like it's 1955." From the article: "Public-health officials certainly weren't expecting to get 'bitten' by mumps this year. Although the virus has been circulating in British kids since 2000, it hadn't caused much trouble in the United States since an outbreak in Kansas 18 years ago. The Midwest is the epicenter again, but the victims are primarily college students, not children. Once a childhood disease, the virus has now taken hold in university towns. That's partly because crowded dorms and cafeterias are breeding grounds for germs that are spread by sneezing and coughing."
Innoculations? (Score:5, Interesting)
In a side note: the girl sitting next to me right now (at work) was gone with the mumps a couple weeks ago.
Wait, whatever happened to MMR? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Innoculations? (Score:5, Interesting)
I also wonder if it could have been that there were bad batches of vaccine or something. Then again, i don't know what the demographic background of the people effected is. If it's people from all over the country (a possibility with college students) then the cause will be different if it's just people from a cluster of states in the mid-west.
Re:Innoculations? (Score:5, Interesting)
It's not clear. NPR had a story discussing this last week. The outbreak is wide enough that people are beginning to wonder if there's a hole in the efficacy of the MMR vaccines. Normally the vaccine is inneffective in 10% of the population, but the way it's spreading makes it seem like there's a wider problem of some sort.
I also wonder if it could have been that there were bad batches of vaccine or something. Then again, i don't know what the demographic background of the people effected is. If it's people from all over the country (a possibility with college students) then the cause will be different if it's just people from a cluster of states in the mid-west.
The article and other news outlets are blaming it on two major factors. The mumps-measles-rubella vaccine shifted from a one-dose variety to a two-dose in the late 1980s. Many people didn't get the second dose, leading to a lowered immunity. That same generation are now going to school and meeting other susceptible people. Instant outbreak.
Also there was a medical study that indicated some links between the vaccin and autism some time ago. The claim was largely retracted, but it was scary enough that some families didn't have their children vaccinated.
What does somewhat surprise me is the university students getting this disease. Don't the universities require proof of up-to-date innoculations for incoming students?
Re:Innoculations? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Border control (Score:4, Interesting)
a Game Theory view of Innoculations (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't forget... (Score:3, Interesting)
Whooping Cough Sucks (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Holy hell.. (Score:2, Interesting)
infectious diseases and that of increased population density of illegal aliens is not
casual.
There was a good reason for medical screening and innoculations that was such a
large part of the legal immigration process at such historical sites as Ellis Island.
Based upon monitoring of immigration news aggregators such as "www.cis.org",
every contiguous TX, NM, AZ, and CA county to the USA's southern border, as well
as every internal focal point of illegal immigration, has seen dramatic increases in
HIV/AIDS and drug resistant STDs, TB, hepatitus, and even malaria.
Border states are now (or in the process of) suing the Federal government for
additional Medicare/Medicaid funding due to the fiscal stress on hospitals and
urgent care medical clinics that are legally forced (and morally obligated) to
provide free health care to the indigent, especially illegal aliens. It is only a
small percentage of illegal aliens who, without false papers, are forced to work
as "off-the-books" day laborers. Most illegal aliens do have documentation -
through ID theft or ID fraud that includes SSNs, health certificates, driver IDs,
and innoculation records. The service industry, especially restaurants, meat
packing plants, K-12 schools and universities, all hire low wage labor whose
documentation will not bear close scrutiny.
If you support the USA May Day demonstrations, you can blame the next
disease you catch on your own political inclinations.
KISS (Score:4, Interesting)
More likely the reason is that unis cramp as many people into 4x4 yards room as they can without having troubles with PETA 'cause they have less room than laying hens.
Re:Holy hell.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Oh come on. That's bullshit. There's a difference between supporting illegal immigration and supporting changes in immigration laws to make it easier for foreigners to work here legally. If they were here legally, they wouldn't have to avoid getting medical treatment, such as vaccinations, due to a fear of getting deported.
This is veering a bit off topic, but it's common knowledge that immigrants come here illegally because there is a demand for their labor. Why not allow them to come here legally, and in return, get the tax revenue we need to support their presence?
Re:Innoculations? (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/ino
The series is billed as "history of ideas" and is generally of very high quality (presenter Melvyn Bragg with a panel of 3 academics working in the area of discussion). This show is a good example.
It's particularly interesting to see that popular opposition to immunisation is not in any way a modern phenomenon.
Re:Whooping Cough Sucks (Score:3, Interesting)
1. Be extremely careful for two years after birth. This is when whooping cough is really dangerous. No day care!
2. Don't worry about the disease for the next 15 to 20 years.
3. If you haven't caught the disease by the time you are a young adult, kiss a sick person.
4. Be immune for longer than the vaccine would give you. Getting sick at age 20 may suck, but it beats getting sick at age 50.
5. Be paranoid again as you get to be 100 years old.
Re:fear mongering (Score:2, Interesting)
If you think the benefit always exceeds the risk, one of these is true:
No two people have the same risk. My risk may be higher or lower than yours. The government is not about to issue personalized risk assessments.
Government isn't an all-knowing benevolent servant. I suggest you consider why drug companies hire lobbyists. The "campaign contributions" happen for a reason, and they get results. (no different from telecom, defence contractors, the RIAA and MPAA, etc.)
Re:Whooping Cough Sucks (Score:2, Interesting)
Her oldest brother had gotten the standard DPT (Diptheria/Pertussis/Tetanus) shot, which scared the crap out of us because it made him sick for a week and he had a 106F fever for 2 days. So my wife refused to let my other kids get the Pertussis (whoopping cough) part of the vaccine and they only got a DT shot.
Funny thing, my middle kid never got the shot or the disease symptoms, despite living in close quarters with the disease (2 parents & 3 kids, 1 bathroom & 2 bedrooms).
So I'm wondering whether the natural disease will give better immunity in the future than the vaccine did for the author of the parent comment.
Yeah. Some people need worms! (Score:3, Interesting)
patients with an auto-immune-related intestinal problem were given worm eggs to drink. The results were dramatically positive. Gut worms are good for you.
If we ever eliminate disease, we'll all need to take immune suppression drugs.
Re:Proof of Immunizations (Score:3, Interesting)
Few hundred for very large values of hundred (Score:3, Interesting)
Sure, if by a few hundred you mean 163,773 [fightingautism.org] (as of 2003). Or, in annual terms, 26,067 new cases in 2003 alone. Sure, we're talking about allegedly caused by the vaccine, but I think you should at least understand why people can be legitimately worried about this! Personally, I think it's unlikely that the vaccines are related to this explosion in autism, but still, if there's even a chance it should not be dismissed lightly. (I'm not suggesting the government has dismissed it - both the CDC and FDA have performed studies and found no connection.) The timing between when vaccines are administerd and the typical onset of autism makes the vaccines a convenient target. However, if thimerosal was the problem, we should soon see autism rates decreasing, in which case the government should expect to see a large number of related lawsuits. If, on the other hand autism rates continue to rise (as I suspect they will) we should look to other causes - such as mercury poisoning in our waters - for the culprit. Actually, we should be looking everywhere we can for the culprit.
Comforting idea (Score:3, Interesting)
It's a comforting idea that the increase in autism is purely due to more liberal diagnoses. I'm certain that it explains part of it. Well, that, and increased awareness. On the other hand, if you look at a curve [fightingautism.org] that describes that increase, it's really hard to accept that this is all due to a more liberal diagnoses or increased awareness. I know several kids with autism (~30 or so). Only two of them might have escaped some kind of diagnosis twenty years ago. Most of the rest of them fall into the category of barely verbal. For these kids, at least, this is not just a liberal diagnoses. (For the two that might have escaped diagnoses, I nevertheless agree with their diagnoses as being autistic. They just have a milder version. Of course, IANAP.)
Not quite (Score:3, Interesting)
That was one concern for many vaccines. Another theory had to do with the combination of vaccines (Mumps in particular) allowing other things to get through the gut and the blood-brain barrier. Some places used a separate Mumps and MR instead of the tripple MMR.
What's disturbing to me is the attitude of the agencies in charge of this stuff. I heard about these concerns from a few people and decided to look into it. On the US side, there is no mention of any issues. The brits at least listen to the concerns and claim to be looking in to it, or recommending some research. When my kid got her first DTaP dose, they gave us some an info packet on the vaccines. They really hype the stuff - one of the vaccines is promoted as the first "anti-cancer" drug, because one of the diseases it protects against on some occasions caused cancer. Then there's the whole issue where DTP vaccine was replaced with DTaP - a newer safer version - not that they ever indicated a problem with the old one.
The only conclusion I reached is that you can't trust anything the FDA or NIH have to say on these "issues". They are clearly pro-vaccination to the point of insanity.
BTW, one of the side effects we were supposed to look for with DTaP was "high fever greater than 105" which occures in 1/16000 cases. Holy crap! 105 can do serious damage to an adult. One is 16000 isn't that much, but how many will get a 104, or even 103 fever from it? It looks like they just used a higher temp to reduce the occurence rate to something more reasonable. And what's this chickenpox vaccine? Kids are supposed to get chickenpox aren't they? They make it sound like your kid will die if they don't get vaccinated. In another 50 years the public will actually believe that crap.
My kid survived her first DTaP just fine, and will continue to get injections containing foreign DNA/RNA as prescribed. There are some documented down sides to actually getting the diseases. There is probably some truth to the claims against the vaccines too, but since the government is in denial it's hard to make a valid comparison of the risks. Most the other sources on the net claim just the opposite - OMFG your kid will die or be a vegetable if they get vaccinated. Their attitude is no better than the gov.