Weather Service Becoming More Tech Friendly 182
awgy writes "The National Weather Service recently began offering XML/RSS feeds of their
alerts,
observations, and
forecasts. Now the Tulsa, OK
Forecast Office is experimenting with
offering forecast files
for Google Earth. It looks like the
National Weather Service is quickly becoming one of the most geek-friendly
government agencies."
Get your forecast on your cell phone (Score:5, Informative)
http://mobile.srh.weather.gov/ [weather.gov]
Poster reveals his youth? (Score:5, Informative)
This was long before XML, so they invented their own format called METAR, no more difficult than, say, email. It was standard, and they have made it public for decades.
"Becoming one of the most geek-friendly government agencies"? They always have been!
--
Evan
weatherbug hack (Score:3, Informative)
Re:where is the feed? (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
This could go dark.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The same weather service (Score:3, Informative)
None of should have to pay accuweather for data that we've already paid for. This bill [loc.gov] in the US Senate is still pending. Given that the NWS is still going forward with making this data available, I don't think that the folks at the NWS support the bill.
Google Earth and Weather (Score:3, Informative)
Didn't I hear something just recently though about the national weather service trying to cut off access to the free information because they said there were enough free or advertizing subsidized services out here already? ahh yes heres some information on it http://www.livejournal.com/community/weathernerds
The bill can be read here
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:s786 [loc.gov]:
Basically private weather trying to shut off gov (Score:5, Informative)
one story:
this is one of many stories about this. [greeleytrib.com]
Basically because our tax dollars pay for the weather service we should be able to get this information. Interesting to note the in the UK the BBC is running into similar problems (its government sponsored as well)
Re:Poster reveals his youth? (Score:5, Informative)
It's not really surprising that the weather service is kinda geeky. Most of it probably rubbed off from pilots who are probably in the top 3 geeky professions.
They do offer real-time weather feeds... (Score:1, Informative)
Otherwise you're stuck with the every-5-minute feeds.
Want to find out more? Google for WSR-88D
-- ac at work
For the folks in the United Kingdom (Score:2, Informative)
Scraping of BBC Weather, but it works!
Re:Basically private weather trying to shut off go (Score:3, Informative)
Weather information is too important to have to pay for it. Accuweather before the internet was the only way TV stations who did not hire meteorologists could do the weather. In fact, I remember a time ago where the local station just paid for the Accuweather folks to record the forecast. Now they may still pay for the weather but it's usually read by a jock or a paid meteorologist. I wonder what the meteorologists who work for Accuweather think about their own companies stance?? In any case, I am ALL FOR RSS feeds for weaher warnings. It's a excellent way to dissemenate the information. I just hope they have a big enough pipe and let us hit it every 5 minutes or less. Of course that little file isn't much, but when half the web is hitting the feed, bandwidth could get a little out of hand.
Re:Basically private weather trying to shut off go (Score:5, Informative)
The funny thing is that it wasn't really a financially driven decision for us. We wanted the forecast information for every zipcode whereas Accuweather forced us to request the addition of new forecast zipcodes one by one from their sales rep. The sales rep would then insist on finding out what new customer of ours was using the data, and the sales rep would then contact +our+ customer to try to sell them additional weather services. We are not in the weather service business and it was very, very annoying.
Re:Impressive (Score:5, Informative)
If you want as-up-to-date as possible, you need to get the NOAAPORT feed directly from satellite. If you've got access to an old 10-12 foot TVRO satellite dish, you can get either a DVB data receiver or a DVB card and the appropriate software from noaaport.net.
Re:Impressive (Score:3, Informative)
Weather is for geeks (Score:3, Informative)
Same here in Canada (Score:5, Informative)
Same here in Canada. The govermental weather site is the most visited website of Canada (about 18 millions hits per day IIRC). http://weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/ [ec.gc.ca]
For-profit organizations try to offer value-added products, but it's crippled with ads. And what many clients do not know, they (example http://meteomedia.com/ [meteomedia.com]) basicly simply repackage and reinterpret the data the government sells them (I work for the Canadian Meteorological Centre
Santorum (Score:4, Informative)
For those of you who realize what a douchebag Rick Santorum is, I bring you the following link:
http://www.spreadingsantorum.com/ [spreadingsantorum.com]
Also, here is a link about his proposed bill to the No Child Left behind act forcing educators to talk about "Intelligent" design. (Oh the irony!)
Santorum Amendment [wikipedia.org]
Here is a link to the wikipedia arcticle about the comments he made that started the whole gay controversy.
Santorum Controversy [wikipedia.org]
Enjoy.
You know, if more young people voted in America, it would be my hope that scumbags such as Santorum wouldn't see the light of day. Campaign donations need to be the first to go. What the bill that santorum is introducing would do is cut the public off from something that it pays for and something that Accuweather uses. Do you think accuweather has their own satellites up there? We don't need accuweather. We NEED the NWS.
Re:Google Earth and Weather (Score:3, Informative)
Alternatively, you can also use X-Planet cloud map overlays. Set your refresh to once every few hours, and you can see the storms that way too.
Us Ham Radio Guys... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:weather.gov is ok... (Score:1, Informative)
The NWS needs to be sure that data is being collected in a consistent manner, else its forecasts based on that data are useless (GIGO).
Re:Tell Santorum what you think about S.786 (Score:2, Informative)
So if you're from the following states:
Alaska - Arizona - Montana - Mississippi - Texas - Maine - Oregon - Nevada - Virginia - New Hampshire - South Carolina - Louisiana - Hawaii - West Virginia - Massachussetts - North Dakota - California - Florida - Washington - New Jersey - Nebraska - Arkansas...
Step up. No need to be dramatic, just tell it how it is.
http://commerce.senate.gov/about/membership.html [senate.gov]
Some problems with this... (Score:3, Informative)
Two, others have already pointed out that AccuWeather does surprisingly little work of its own. It takes data collected at taxpayer expense, repackages it, and sells it. Certainly AccuWeather has the right to try doing this if they want, but what right to they have to say that the government shouldn't provide that same data to anyone else it wants? AccuWeather is not paying for this data; there is no contractual relationship between them and the government. If they want a contract, that's fine, but they should pay for it in that case; after all, one-sided contracts aren't valid.
Re:weather.gov is ok... (Score:2, Informative)
I'd say they're providing pretty good local forecasts. I'm currently outside DC and yes, the local sources are much better; but hey it's a big market here.
Those living in a tiny town in the middle of nowhere, I'm sure they won't have those resources so this is pretty good it seems to me.