Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yeah (Score 1) 265

I agree, Newsome does seem to be practicing to be an anti-Trump. Anything he suggests seems to be chosen based on "how mad will it make Trump/republicans". Not on "is it a good idea" or even "does the left like this idea".
His likely replacement (Steyer) is also wading into this territory, most likely because it appears to be a way to win.

Comment Re:Yeah (Score 1) 265

Just to be accurate: the reason we have 2 parties is because we don't use ranked voting. They are not independent problems.

The electoral college's problem is actually that the states have rules so that if 51% of the voters vote for A, 100% of the electors vote for A. This is producing huge swings from the popular vote. It's also true that a voter in Wyoming gets about 4x as many electoral votes as one in Texas but this is actually not a big problem because Wyoming has very few voters. It is plausible we could get ranked voting working very well if the counts of all the orderings were multiplied by the ratio between electoral votes and actual votes, and there may be reasons this is easier to pass than a true popular ranked voting.

Comment Re:Not enough money (Score 1) 84

2x seems possible if no government spending is replaced. However your 3x estimate is way too high, people living only on UBI would not be paying taxes (well federal and state) anyway, so you have double-counted them.

The hope (perhaps futile) is that they would remove other government programs (ie social security). Or make everybody get the same government programs (ie everybody gets SNAP and they can use it to buy food, everybody gets the same amount of housing assistance (which must be spent on mortgage/rent/property taxes/untilities/insurance). These would just be part of the UBI, with some restrictions on what you can spend that portion on.

Comment Re:Make iCloud optional or enable Airdrop b/w devi (Score 1) 68

I was able to get it to save all photos on Google Photos. But I seem to remember it was a pain, it took a long time before it threw away it's attempt to put all the photos into iCloud and stopped complaining in popups that I needed to buy more iCloud storage.

Free Google Photos is about 4x the size of what free iCloud is.

Comment Another worry (Score 1) 59

I'm pretty worried that all interdepartmental communication (those regulations, the forms for the regulations, invoices, contracts, lawsuits, etc) will transform into bloated gobbledygook that only AIs can read and write. They will have made their own language that we won't understand and will have to start trusting them to accurately translate between it and human language.

Comment Re:My home network is nearly pure IPv6 (Score 1) 73

To me the hoops that smoothbrains will jump through to avoid IPv6 and stay on legacy IPv4, especially when hosting, is pathetic. NAT, port forwarding, tunnels, blah blah blah blah.

I have something like ~1.2 trillion times the number of routable addresses that the entire IPv4 space has. Not all are reachable, of course, just the services that need incoming access and they're each on their own isolated DMZ.

Comment My home network is nearly pure IPv6 (Score 1) 73

Started the move about 18 months ago when I decided to get off my lazy ass. My ISP gives out a /56 prefix, so that lets me run 256 /64 subnets/VLANs in the house, currently there are ~10 in use. Everything get a GUA through SLAAC and I use RAs (Router Advertisements) to give ULAs to everything. Any external facing services get their own VLAN and /64 for the system(s) as needed. Firewall blocks all incoming as they usually do by default and I punch a hole for the external-facing systems. They can't reach back into the network, they only answer the phone. All the systems update DNS dynamically if the prefix or full address ever change.

I have an SSH bastion set up. In all this time there has not been a single SSH attempt from the internet. On IPv4 it was constant background noice.
For those legacy IPv4-only systems on the internet, I set up NAT64. I have an IoT VLAN and IoT 2.4 GHz wireless network that are only IPv4 because a lot of IoT network stacks are junk.

I'm still farting around with it, but man oh man, there's no way I'd go back to IPv4. It was one of the best moves I've done in ages.

Comment Impossible (Score 1) 139

This is obviously impossible unless almost any moving parts are prevented, or printing with some materials is prevented. That would make it impossible to 3D print lots of stuff that is not illegal.

The effect on open software and hardware is also disastrous.

As others pointed out, currently you can make better gun parts on some non-computerized equipment, so this also does not seem to prevent anything.

Slashdot Top Deals

The number of computer scientists in a room is inversely proportional to the number of bugs in their code.

Working...