Comment Re: Soon (Score 1) 102
I don't live in a nation that medicates people for thinking.
Unfortunate that by your own admission, you do.
I don't live in a nation that medicates people for thinking.
Unfortunate that by your own admission, you do.
Poor are better off than ever throughout history.
That's actually why all these "we're all going to die in global boiling if we don't put poorest back into starvation by denying them cheap and reliable energy" mostly stopped at this point. Too much repetition, too many people that heard it all since at least 1980s, and oceans are still not only not boiling off, but humans are better off than ever in our history. And it's getting better.
So the language has been shifting ever since massive reckoning of "we were laughably, insanely wrong in our predictions" that happened around 2020 in IPCC. That's when they had to admit that hard predictions made in 2000 of what should happen by 2020 if any of their predictions are correct turned out so phenomenally wrong when 2020 arrived and we could observe not only none of the catastrophies predicted occurring, but that in many cases what was predicted from 2020 baseline... got better. I.e. desertification was massively pushed back for example. There's now such a massive surplus of Polar Bears, the animal that was supposed to die out due to "destruction of habitat because of AGW" that we had to roll back many of the protection measures as Polar Bears are so numerous and spread so widely that they're actively hunting humans in the Arctic towns and villages now.
So now the language shifted from "we're all going to die in 12 years due to global boiling if we don't do what we the great priests of AGW say" to "catasophe is still happening, it's just so slow that no one can see it. And no, we're making no predictions on when it'll actually happen, so you don't get another 2020 moment, when we predicted a lot of things that should happen by that year, and none of them happen, making us look like what we are: peddlers of lies for personal financial and status gain".
Case described is about parsing CV and application with an AI.
Which means input is both used as a part of an AI prompt, and as a part of actual written application.
I don't think that "lazy managers" are the ones who decide what backend outputs in the first place. That's software architects' job. Lazy manager gets what software architect decides is appropriate for her.
I know you don't. That's what the second paragraph is about.
You're assuming that backend reading prompt will honor things like that, rather than simply output text in easily readable format stripping custom formatting entirely.
Second round is human, and it will see this comment and immediately dismiss the candidate even if this did work.
Hint: it won't work because AI will almost certainly see this as a direct appeal to itself when it's not expecting one = failure.
Weird how you conclude that from this story considering that microsoft hasn't sold XP or 7 in almost a decade at this point.
Low IQ is usually not a feature of linux fanboys. You must be an exception to the rule.
They didn't get anything in exchange for this action in addition to what they already had. All they got was americans agreeing that they will continue negotiations Trump stopped two days ago in response to this law. And Americans likely added a few more points to the agenda limiting taxation capabilities of Canadian state.
So all that happened is that Trump just called another bluff. This was a Canadian mistake similar to one Trump made when he stated memeing about annexing Canada, getting a much less friendly government elected there.
Some things you need to actually hold back on until ink is on the paper.
Porn industry embraced it wholeheartedly.
What you found is a one of a tiny handful of accounts that is trying to differentiate by saying "look I'm not doing what everyone else is doing". This is why it emphasizes "this creator". The entire selling point is that everyone has already gone for AI.
One of the main things I use AI for is to help me formulate my thoughts into words. For the most part I know what I want, and know what to look for as the end result.
I think of it like learning to ask an intern to do something, with their corpus of knowledge and their brain's present neural network.
The only thing I don't use it for at the moment is making it learn the individual refinements, as that requires significant time and hardware cost.
Damn, that's a new one. Microsoft goon.
I'll put it on my bio, next to "windows peaked with XP, 7 is last decent windows, everything after is garbage".
Fiction brain in action. Mordor isn't real, nor is the scenario you imagined featuring it.
So when Lindsey starts reading from her AmEx-approved script, callers are infuriated by what they perceive to be another machine.
If she's accurately executing the programmers' script, I'd say she is a machine. Somebody port Doom to her!
This is a fuckin' awesome idea, but there's an easy improvement over the red rectangle and block symbol. Seriously, dude, you gotta use the sign images from They Live (1988). You know you want to.
"Don't talk to me about disclaimers! I invented disclaimers!" -- The Censored Hacker