That's because we "same people" have zero trust in Agent Orange as he threatens his country's own allies and invades other countries just for fun, while he simultaneously shits the bed over and over and over and over again.

We do, however, have at least some trust in the inspectors who, until the Great Trumpster Fire came along, were ensuring that Iran wasn't building nukes.

That would depend on which agency you're talking about, and how well Microsoft managed to curry favour with Trump.

I hear that money, flattery, and spurious ersatz medals can go a long way toward making der Trumpenfuhrer look the other way. And if the agency in question was NOAA or CDC, Trump might actually hand out a medal.

US is a danger to everyone.

FYFFY
(fixed your fix for you)

Here in Canada - at least among us average citizens - NATO is a very iffy thing just now. NATO's supposed leader has threatened the sovereignty of other NATO members, and launched trade wars with some of them. Ambassador to Canada Pete Huckster is an insulting arrogant bully, and he and American politicians are supporting Alberta separatists in a not-so-clandestine fifth column operation aimed at breaking my country apart.

So while the US spying on other NATO members is reprehensible, it's not really extraordinary. Throughout NATO, dealing with that kind of shit from America is just business as usual now.

And if they don't have the scale on their own, they can combine forces with other like-minded countries.

That's probably not ideal, but it would be WAY better than trusting ANY private-sector cloud services provider - never mind an American one - with all that sensitive data.

The Illinois legislation targets the LLMs themselves. I would like to see companion legislation targeting the server farm goldrush as well, since rapid growth in that sector seems to be driven - or at least excused - largely by AI demand.

By far the most prominent news stories deal with the psycho-social and job-market damages caused by LLM use. Equally important are the serious environmental and physical health consequences resulting from the server farms whose growth has exploded since the tech bros started pushing AI as though it's ShamWow.

And then there are Fascist Jews such as Netanyahu, almost everyone in his government and - so it would seem - a very large portion of Israelis. They are the ones who either support or actively participate in genocide, the killing of journalists, and the beating and imprisonment of people who try to give humanitarian aid to starving, dying Palestinians.

As far as I can tell, there are both liberal and conservative Jews among the Fascists. Thankfully, there are also both liberal and conservative Jews among those who denounce the genocide.

The Venn diagram of liberal Jews, conservative Jews, Israelis, Zionists, genocide supporters / deniers, and genocide opponents is one which I would not even attempt to draw. The thought of that makes my head hurt - never mind my heart.

That depends on your definition of "right wing".

I suspect that for most people at your end of the political spectrum the phrase means "conservative, traditional, and with a social, moral, and financial hierarchy that I'm bloody well going to climb as far as I can". I think folks at my end of the spectrum extend that definition to include extremely rich assholes who have invented and fought to legalize accounting dodges which allow them to pay ridiculously low taxes. (Oh, I almost forgot - add in the entirety of the fast-growing military-industrial complex).

Did you know that one of those tricks that the uber-rich use to owe sweet-fuck-all in taxes is to take smaller salaries than some of the people they employ? They pay income tax on those earnings, but they don't pay tax on the large loans-with-extremely-favourable-terms which underwrite their lavish lifestyles.

They themselves - along with, say, shares in their companies - are the collateral for loans which allow them to pay income tax on only a VERY small portion of the money which is really "income" by any reasonable standard. Unfortunately, tax laws aren't a reasonable standard.

Any guesses as to who pushed for, and had their hands and noses in, crafting the tax laws? You see, THOSE people are the ones by which we lefties largely identify the "right wing". The identity politics, social conservatism, "pull your own weight" rhetoric and the like are just sleight-of-hand distractions.

SSDs have gotten stoopid expensive anyway, so maybe it's a good time to go back to spinning rust.

Then again, might this attack even work on the the silicon of a magnetic drive? Or is the buffer too small to be vulnerable in the same way?

For int'l flights: Amazon Leo is launching next year. Delta is waiting.

And LEO is even easier than GEO since it doesn't have any moving parts. GEO had to rotate to keep alignment. LEO are all using phased arrays.

For existing code in the QA he said leave it be and it's better to fix.

For new code, he's recommending Rust and the advantage he talks about is that it makes the code more maintainable by people. And one thing that every AI coding talk I've seen agrees on is that what makes code more maintainable by people also helps AI and vice versa.

People and AI both have limited attention and memory. The less context necessary the easier it is to evaluate safety.

Another thing not in the summary he touches on is hardware safety. Not just software bugs but also compromised hardware which if your driver is memory safe can also prevent a buggy or adversarial piece of hardware since the hardware is effectively user input.

To balance out OP's selective quoting to avoid people strawman-ing his argument as a fanatic who can't balance risk:

They might, if they were subject to laundering and ironing on a regular basis.

That suggestion assumes that CEOs have sufficient imagination, familiarity with workflows, analytical ability, open-mindedness, and patience to do the required work.

In the days when CEOs rose through the ranks and actually knew shit, it might be feasible. But I suspect the average C-level these days is a placeholder who probably costs their company - and society - more than a dozen or more of them are actually worth in real-world terms.