Yes. While LLM-type AI will probably not cause a job apocalypse (it looks more and more problematic every day and the business numbers basically have zero chance to work in the foreseeable future), automation and things like simulation and design software are drastically reducing the need for manual labor and that is an ongoing and successful process. It is also a slow process, which is probably why the not-so-smart majority are trying denial as a coping strategy, with predictable results.
We need to face it sooner or later: Only talented people are going to have work in the future. Education can enable these but it cannot create them. Whether it is STEM graduates that are actually good (!) at what they do or tradespeople that are. Obviously, some service and entertainment jobs will remain, but these will not make a large difference. Now, how do you design a society where something like 50% or more of the population is basically not employable? You cannot go back to the old model where women got no education and stayed at home. You cannot imprison them all. You cannot just give them an UBI and let them rot (an UBI with a decent level will be necessary, but not sufficient). You cannot kill most of them by doing large land-wars (which was the historic way to get rid of an abundance of unruly men). You cannot make them into a cult and have them pray away their lives, because that does not work large-scale.
So, what to do? Interesting times are ahead, no doubt.