Comment Re: American exports (Score 1) 60
100 years of democratic governments and we would trust the US again.
That would be foolish. Don't trust the USA until we fix this too-strong executive branch problem with major constitutional changes.
100 years of democratic governments and we would trust the US again.
That would be foolish. Don't trust the USA until we fix this too-strong executive branch problem with major constitutional changes.
Making the age barrier at 15, is completely retarded
The age of consent in France is 15. French politicians no doubt set the social media age limit to that number for convenience. It means they can still use social media to contact the teenagers that it's legal for them to fuck.
- Wikipedia, which has an official stance of ideological filtering
In these post-truth days, impartial facts are considered left wing ideology.
You think "my AI is so misaligned that it responds to a benchmark task by hacking" is an ad for your products? You think this makes companies eager to allow this on their networks?
It's no different from any other LLM stuff. The execs who want to justify its use will come up with an excuse, like it was the prompt engineer's fault. It's easy to blame humans, and even easier to blame the wrong ones. This is "my AI is so powerful that it can do things which are hard for humans" dressed up in some other bullshit.
HDR video is nice, but I hope HDR images are not far behind. These days even mid range phones take HDR images, and conversion to SDR is often sub-par.
Do they even use copper? I think a lot of POTS is aluminium now, or CCA. No expense incurred.
I got a couple temp bans back to back for pointing out to the moderators that the spirit of liberalism and free speech means protecting speech you disagree with.
Translation: I told liberals they should give me a platform to be racist because that's liberal
Once I got off the site I found the real, actual liberalism was being supported more by the right than the left now.
Translation: I found a safe space to be racist
If I make a really shitty encode of a movie, I'm still infringing when I distribute it.
Yes, but that is just clear and straight copyright infringement in the form of copying, albeit with degradation and format shifting. Training AI isn't that from a technical sense for sure, and maybe also from a strict legal sense.
morally, we'll need new laws to protect IP from the AI ripoff-engine.
Combining law and morality is danger territory.
Thanks, I forgot again heh. Probably because that will never not be weird to me.
It would be amazing for me at work where we don't have a license for Acrobat which allows us to do that, except they install Chrome and not Firefox on our PCs (because they like having us spied on I guess) so I still won't be able to do this.
British Mandate 1917, actually.
The UK partitioned Palestine but did not found the nation of Israel. That was the US, and it was done through the UN. America always wanted to fuck up the middle east for economic and racist reasons, but I repeat myself.
There is a feasible solution.
Make them continue to provide the service if they want to operate.
If they don't, terminate their licenses and require them to sell to someone who will do it.
Verizon doesn't meet that requirement.
My local tower, which they own, goes out after less than 36 hours
Using a work for AI training is not reproduction. It's not storing the works.
Creating the training corpus, on the other hand... That IS storing them, and completely as well.
This is a settlement for use which has already occurred under existing laws.
Your idea is fairly good but a counterproposal might be to change nothing but expiry, and go back to a 15 year copyright term with no extensions, which would serve everyone.
% A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back the when it begins to rain. -- Robert Frost