Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:User Licenses.. (Score 1) 50

Don't they say its just a license and not outright ownership? Wonder how this will go down.

Well it's in France where France has consumer protection laws and truth in advertising laws so they can't just pull the "it's a license not a purchase Nyer Nyer" in a French court and expect to walk out like King Dick. Even though you're purchasing a license it's still a purchase and you still have the expectation that it's not time limited, especially if a time limitation was not specified and clearly advertised before purchase.

Comment Re:Fall is Coming (Score 1) 44

Microsoft extended my Windows 10 license for a year - it expires this fall. They did this for a large mess of people. Those Linux numbers are going to go higher in the fall when I, and I'm sure many people, will take the leap to safety and leave Windows behind. For me, it's goodby to 36 years of Windows.

I honestly don't think most people give a crap about patches and support, especially home users. Microsoft is only doing it because they've been pretty much forced by the EU.

I'm also looking at a switch to Linux and I've found that the big problem is still Windows. If you're setting up a fresh install on a new machine you'll have a pretty easy time even if you're dual booting however trying to use your existing steam install in Windows is a right PITA. Hence I'm wating until I get a new gaming boxen to try going over full time.

Comment Re:The dystopian UK (Score 1) 114

There must be a reason both Orwellian nightmares and V for Vendetta were essentially set in the UK written by UK authors.. they knew something too many people seem to have averted their eyes from for too long, and now here we are - the dystopian nightmares becoming reality, one salami slice and boiled frog at a time.

It's because in both of those worlds, the US was effectively destroyed. In Nineteen Eighty-Four it was part of the same nation as the UK (Oceana) and in V for Vendetta, it was destroyed by infighting. The UK is presumed stable enough to survive cataclysmic events. The US is presently demonstrating it really isn't and is far more Orwellian than the UK's worst nightmare. I can still criticise the UK leader, Kier Starmer (yes I can, Joe Rogan was talking complete bollocks as per usual), hows that working with you being able to critisise Trump or Charlie Kirk (even daring to repeat what Kirk actually said).

In fact the only UK politico who is likely to come after you for criticising him is the Far-right fascist frog-faced fucktard Nigel Farage... Odd that but as he's never going to get anywhere near power I can still tell Frog Face to Fuck Right Off.

Comment Re:Windows and Linux both fine, its 3rd party driv (Score 2) 186

These driver crashes on Windows typically lead to having to reinstall/"repair" Windows.

Nah, literally something that hasn't happened to 99.99% of users in the past 20 years.

I've been doing this for 30 years as well, and you're full of crap.

Well there's your problem. Stop using Windows ME. It's very clear that if your windows is breaking to the point of needing a reinstall / repair and it's a "frequent occurrence" then my unfortunate sir, *you* are the problem. Not even TFA is talking about that.

Windows has been pretty damned stable since Windows 7 was released, that's 2009 for anyone not paying attention. Microsoft changed it so that one bad driver can't crash the entire OS.

Seems Apple is going all out with the paid propaganda of late... Because there's no way they're cheaper. If anything keeping hardware for longer makes it more expensive as you have to deal with more hardware failures, extended warranties, outages, et al. I suspect Apple is using very, very funny maths.

Comment Re:Priorities (Score 1) 116

Does Canada have a situation where people of a specific skin colour were effectively locked out of standard hospitals before the 1970s, and thus a sizable proportion of people do not have easy access to birth certificates and by extension ways to get IDs?

Regardess, while it's entirely possible it's changed in the last 25 years, when I lived in Britain I didn't have to show ID. Why would you? If two people turned up to vote claiming to be the same person, it'd become obvious as soon as the second person showed up. Chances of it being discovered there were bogus votes would be 100%, and the chances of you being caught illegally voting were 50%. Why is ID even necessary to do something when it clearly isn't going to do anything to prevent fraud, and will likely exclude swathes of people from exercising their civil rights?

Aside from airports, the only place I get asked to show ID is occasionally when I buy alcohol and at my age that is a complement.

The previous conservative government introduced the requirement for voter ID in the UK not because there was any voter fraud, repeated investigations found almost none, rather it was a half-arsed attempt at US style voter disenfranchisement and all it did was give the opposition a huge majority. Also this is how the British do non-compliance. People vote with any kind of ID, bank cards, work IDs, anything to comply with the letter of the law but giving a two fingered salute to the spirit of it.

Comment Re:seriously? (Score 1) 17

The world is still the same, but elona got the subsidies and ran to the place where it doesn't need to pay taxes on the profits they generated.

Elnor and his companies were always like this, it's just that they aren't even pretending like they're hiding it any more.

Comment Re:That explains it (Score 1) 54

"vranyo" is not some special concept, it is simply a colloquial term for a lie. Similar to the English word "bullshit" in this regard, but far less vulgar.

That would depend on which anglophone culture you're from. To Brits and Australians the word "bullshit" is not that vulgar, we've far, far more vulgar language.

Comment Re:That explains it (Score 1) 54

Possibly, but I don't think so. Russians have a very, very high tolerance for tyrants and corruption. It's in their culture, and has been for 800 years, ever since they began paying tribute to the Golden Horde. The lessons and values from the renaissance and the enlightenment mean nothing to them.

Russians do not mind a boot on their neck, so long as it's a Russian boot.

I've recently started to read a translation of Tsushima by Alexsey Novikov-Priboy. He was a sailor in the Imperial Russian Navy at the battle of Tsushima (1905 for those playing along at home) and it does a really good job of explaining why people supported Communism, it wasn't that Communism was good, even back then people knew it wasn't but the system in place was even worse. Unaccountable leaders, the wealthy being untouchable, no benefit and lots of burdens for the common man... Sound familiar?

Comment Re:multi-day? (Score 1) 179

500 miles is not a "multi-day" range. That's a day (300-600 miles) for local driving, or less than a day for OTR long haul. 12+ hour days are not common, most of it spent driving. Even a local fuel delivery route is going to exceed that in most cases.

I'm guessing these will be for close-to-terminal local delivery only, because they're not going to have much use beyond that, particularly with lengthy charge requirements and no sleeper.

To put that into perspective, an 8 hour shift at 60 MPH (maximum speed limit for a HGV in the UK) is 480 miles, that would be for an owner operator who, as you pointed out, often does more than 8 hours. Company owned artics and lorries are often run 24 hours a day as different drivers operate the same lorry in shifts. Especially for local delivery vehicles (which are the ones likely to be doing fewer miles in town), when the first driver finishes his shift and gets back to the depot, the next driver climbs into his farts.

Comment Re:*facepalm* (Score 1) 177

The failure is the point. They are trying to work up to getting VPNs blocked. I suspect they will have shrunk our economy by 60% before we manage to stop them. I only hope that, at that point, I will be able to get a legalized lynch mob up for them. The chances are reasonably good.

Brexit has already shrunk our economy by at least 60%.

Both major parties are in the pockets of big business and they'll put a stop to this nonsense before it gets that far. Yay corruption.

Comment Re:4Chan toy store? (Score 1) 177

Companies -- wherever they're based -- are not allowed to sell unsafe toys to children in the UK.

Wait - 4chan is now a toy store?

The thing is, the UK safety laws don't apply in China where you can sell unsafe toys to children.

That's the crux of the matter, UK law applies in the UK only. #Chan is right to tell OfCom to go pound sand (with a 21" retractable baton).

By and large the UK gets laws right, safety without giving up liberty (despite what the far right propaganda says) however this is one of the cases where they've got it horribly wrong simply because they didn't understand the technology involved. The people who created these laws (previous conservative government, for those who didn't know) genuinely think that the internet is like broadcast TV and that people will regularly be accidentally exposed to "the porn".

Comment Re:uhh duh (Score 1) 63

So, a duopoly.

There are ways of dealing with monopolies/duopolies. Break them up. Probably can't do that effectively with Apple/Android. Then there's regulation. You place the entity(s) under the authority of some thing like a utilities commision. They want to make any changes to their pricing or terms of service, they have to seek approval from the commission. Such a situation is so onerous that those subject to it (even utilities) do everything in their power to weasel out from under it. And one obvious way would be to open up the platforms to third party app stores.

"But we can't! Muh security!" Wrong. There's nothing stopping the third party stores from implementing their own app vetting proceses. And allowing users to pick one tailored to their needs.

The problem isn't that there is not a way to deal with this, the problem is America, specifically the overriding belief that "government bad, company good" despite all evidence to the contrary.

They fail to understand why the EU regulating tech giants is so important and why Europeans agree with it... and that it's pretty much the only thing protecting them and still they'll rally against any attempt to reign in the unchecked power of large corporations.

Comment Re:Why not yearly? (Score 1) 66

Why not just switch to yearly reporting? Companies can still report more often, but if it allows companies to hire managers that aren't constantly chasing quarterly results at the expense of long term prospects, it's better for everyone other than investors that like to profit off of valuation swings from quarterly earnings reports. Those people aren't creating anything of real value anyway so why should I care if they have to find something more useful to do?

The problems are not being caused by the existance of quarterly reports, rather with what certain people demand of them. Ever increasing growth and profit at the expense of everything else.

Getting rid of the reporting won't make change this one iota... It just makes it easier to hide the poor state of the economy and potential wrong doings of rich people.

Slashdot Top Deals

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary saftey deserve neither liberty not saftey." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Working...