Comment Re:PulseAudio is broken (Score 1) 815
My point is that you have no business commenting on PulseAudio's design. You're not qualified, and you're not even interested in becoming qualified.
He was wondering if you were trying to discredit him. Looks like you proved his point.
Here's what he's qualified to comment on. He's qualified to comment on the fact that his sound isn't working.
If Linux developers don't want users who aren't qualified to do more than that, then they need to stop making statements about how they want to take over the world, or how they want everyone who currently uses Windows, to use Linux instead.
Pulse's single main problem is rampant, uncontrolled featuritis. I got that from the linked article. You don't need to know anything about the minute crap involved with the design. There's too much emphasis on including a whole heap of features that most people don't care about or need, when the basic functionality of simply playing sound.
It is also true, as has been said elsewhere in this forum, that sound playback in FreeBSD just works; simply, quietly, without fuss.
You therefore have no excuses, no justification, and no escaping this issue. Pulse is a failure. It is not doing what its' users want it to do. End of story. Sounding as smug, elitist, and dismissive as you want is not going to change that fact.