Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Monopolistic power. (Score 1) 40

Exclusive contracts in media have been SOP since forever. If some YouTube sellout signs a specific exclusivity contract with YouTube, then they, you and Netflix have nothing to say about it. It's possible some of this could be found anti-competitive, when no specific contract is in play, but that's a road to a protracted legal battle taking years: feel free to hold your breath waiting for whatever utopian outcome you think you're owed on that one. What I find interesting is YouTube management clearly being un-self-aware and unconcerned, despite being a subsidiary of a company that has just been convicted as a monopolist. I can only take that to mean that they're confident that they've purchased sufficient political influence.

Comment Re:Which Epic games is that? (Score 1) 48

I find it interesting that in the end it was for-profit businesses

Valve with Proton and SteamOS/Steam Deck. Framework and System76.

The success of Linux has owed a great deal to for-profit businesses for a long time now, way before Valve and Framework came along. Oracle, in 1998, porting their bread-and-butter database to Linux as a fully supported tier 1 platform, was a monumental moment. Then IBM got on board with major investments to bring Linux to their mainframes. Then Google, adopting Linux for their Android platform, in 2007-2008. Before all of those, there were countless ISPs standing up Linux on their low cost hardware to sell, I repeat sell , hosting. That evolved into Linux becoming the de facto standard platform of Big Tech search, social media and media streaming. The force of these commercial decisions is at least as important a contributor to Linux success and anything else you might credit.

until someone figured out a way to make money from it

Because these are ebil for-profit operations, we’re free to impugn their motivations with as much petty hate as we can muster. But if you’re thankful for Linux and have the least bit of intellectual honesty, you know you owe these businesses, whether you like it or not.

Comment Re:China will beat the US (Score -1) 165

Don't waste time with mullahphiles. I have long come to the conclusion that West-hating muzzie-loving hamasexuals are incel women-hating nerds who admire sharia shitholes because they can't get laid, women laugh at them (and rightly so) and they spend their lives seething with impotent rage and hatred. They want a world where males are in charge because they have a schlong (however microflaccid it might be) and impose their warped will on women who are parsecs better than them. Don't argue with them, beat them up and shit on their faces.

Comment Re:Sad, and but learn the right lessons (Score 0) 141

He made a choice. If he had had the sort of gall typically exhibited by these grievance grifters he could be on the his martyrdom tour right now, jetting around to hob nob and make poignant videos with all his celebrity supporters, while they litigation financed his next decade of income suing everyone involved. One call to Obama and Netflix would make a 5 episode biopic, and spend a couple hundred million doing it. That's probably still going to happen, btw.

Apparently he lacked the fortitude for it.

Comment Re:Sad, and but learn the right lessons (Score 2) 141

Or how Arday got the police to investigate people who brought up concerns

Arday wasn't a dummy. He knew who he could get away with plagiarizing. He plagiarized minor academics; people that didn't have the power to shift authorities. People that were vulnerable to jackboots investigation "threats." He knew better than to plagiarize someone that mattered.

Comment Re:Pointless circle jerk. (Score -1, Flamebait) 42

There are HUNDREDS of brands of camera smart glasses

The vast majority of those "brands" are fly-by-night Asian products from effectively un-suable companies. Meta is a juicy American big tech outfit with deep pockets.

They're looking for a big payout. Europe and its pressure groups and governments have been using US big tech companies like giant money pinatas for a long time now. This isn't about anyone's privacy, and you'll know that years from now, after Meta has lost their suit and the market is still full of knockoff Asian wearable cameras. It's about a generational wealth acquisition for a bunch of lawyers and their investors. Yes, such lawsuits have investors.

Comment Re:Does it matter though? (Score 4, Informative) 70

You can piggy back on the civilian infrastructure without ever exposing devices - just require all devices to access anything beyond the local network via a specific router, which pushes all traffic over a VPN, and nothing goes out over the naked internet as its all dropped if its not going over the VPN. Then all you need to ensure are thoroughly audted and hardened are those routers - everything else cant hit the internet.

Comment Re:Great (Score 1) 45

Highly likely.

Fired police are routinely hired by other agencies after being fired for cause. Substance abuse, abuse of power, it doesn't matter; this is commonplace, your ignorance not withstanding. Agencies are limited by union rules, which have the force of law via contract, from investigation of previous employment with other agencies; unless an actual criminal conviction occurs, whatever the relevant cause may have been essentially doesn't exist. The people making the hiring decisions are, likewise, union members, and are beholden to the union in their processes and decision making.

This reality is so prevalent it has a name: "Wandering Officer." You're free to dispel your ignorance on the matter with a 1700+ page analysis from 2020 if you wish.

Police departments hate lawsuits

While this is essentially correct, you're missing critical information: the plaintiffs they fear more than any other are public sector unions.

Slashdot Top Deals

The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

Working...