Which probably is much worse, because the increased depth leads to higher decoherence risks. But it hardly matters. This stuff will never scale to useful sizes with useful computation lengths. Nothing exponential ever does unless these sizes are tiny. For QC workloads, useful sizes are large. Factoring 35 does nothing. With the one exceptions of running Physics experiments, but these are not computations, no matter the lies.

Yes. Agree to all of this.

My prediction is that IT regulation and liability will come from the EU, because the EU actually understands that some things need to be controlled or everything goes to shit. In fact, we already have it, in part. The GDPR and, very new and untested, software liability when selling to private customers via consumer protection laws.

The US? They will adopt it when they have really no other choice because nothing works anymore.

True. At least that is MBA thinking. And that is why we need liability and regulation. Amateur-hour in IT is getting massively too expensive.

Which is simply utterly dumb if you have to continue sharing a country. Or a planet.

The difference is that news media skew intentionally, while "AI" is simply dumb.

Totally usable and helpful, right?

Yeah, but not the old Delhi.

Because this could very likely have been prevented or at the very least made much less severe. All it would have taken is doing what the state-of-the-art requires. But no, greed runs supreme.

Because I can really not see them doing anything like that because they though it was right.

Ok bot.

No monopoly is required for them to violate the law.

That's true even in the US, not that we enforce antitrust law here.

And you've made your own non-anonymous coward comment. You're afraid to not be a cuck for corporations.

Not where I live. They do have a stop sign that flips out to the side.

I'm wondering what I said that made you think I thought otherwise.

Probably. But this is just a legal fiction.