Comment Re: Addictive Design is just Good Design (Score 1) 25
Addictive products are just good products! Have a cigar.
Addictive products are just good products! Have a cigar.
It's more that they have seen they can count on protectionism. Which ironically they also hate because it subjects them to dealers
Indeed. Here in California we are the poster children for this, because we have a 55 mph speed limit while towing which is NEVER enforced. We have a requirement that headlights be aimed correctly, same. We have a law saying that if there are five or more people behind you, you must pull over at the first safe opportunity to let them pass, same. Fender flares must project as far as tires, same. (Anyone who's ever had a rock break their windshield understands.)
CHP cares specifically and only about revenue generation, so they do nothing to improve safety except go after speeders. That's not nothing, but it's not enough.
If they weren't they wouldn't buy their shit, so they KNOW they're stupid
First, Iran has never been close to having a weapon
Second, if they do want one, it's because their primary enemies have one, and one of them is the only country to ever nuke another country
Or the gravel pit
"Genie" is just the anglicized form of "djinn", they are the same thing. "Ifrit" is the name for the evil ones.
New tech has never and will never benefit workers in-and-of itself.
It does when the workers themselves own the tech.
A carpenter with power tools is going to make a lot more and better chairs with less effort than one without. But to worker in a chair factory it makes no difference how good the tools are.
How the FCC is powerless to enforce net neutrality while at the same time enforcing bans under the guise of software security.
The FCC isn't making these decisions. They are made by the DoD and the DHS, per the initial announcement.
It's an argument for those of us who are happy with simplicity/manual operation for less cost.
Manual windows don't reduce cost much unless you're going to put them on a lot of vehicles, otherwise it's just more parts you need to design and stock, meanwhile window motors are shared between multiple vehicles. Statistically nobody would rather have manual windows on a vehicle which costs even $40k so it might actually increase costs to offer them.
That lack of nuclear weapons in use is evidence of the control.
This is the most "correlation vs causation" quote ever. If you were in any kind of position of authority related to nuclear weapons, it would be Jurassic Park levels of hubris.
Also, anything sounds big when you put it in gallons. Doesn't sound so big when you mention that's 92 acre feet, the amount used by less than 20 acres / 8 hectares of alfalfa per year. Or when you mention that a typical *closed loop* 1GW nuclear reactor uses 6-20 billion gallons of cooling water per year (once-through uses 200-500 billion gallons, though most of that is returned, whereas closed loop evaporates it)
20 years ago I thought these agencies were incompetent. Now I know that it was actually their peak. The FCC of prior administrations would document their goals, send out a notice for public comment, write a proposed rule set, hold a hearing, the make a rule. Now they make a rule, and everyone goes "That doesn't even make sense" then they switch it. It's not just the FCC: It's the DOJ, DHS, EPA, etc.
Not after the bribes are paid.
"Iran have been planning and trying to get nukes forever."
That's what naziyahoo says every time Israel needs money for more bombs, and you internalized it because your mind is weak.
When you don't know what to do, walk fast and look worried.