Comment Well, the lower intelligence copies the higher one (Score 1) 61
For most people, the LLM is "smarter" than they are because their skills regarding understanding and insight are essentially zilch.
For most people, the LLM is "smarter" than they are because their skills regarding understanding and insight are essentially zilch.
I see the victims of bad tech are, again, out in force and insist the bad tech is actually good tech. How pathetic.
Your comment does not make sense, hence I interpreted it as insult and gave right back. A prototype that has been running 5 years without major problems is a successfully proven prototype but in no way "proven technology". That requires a bit more.
Xbox has been dying for 20 years now.
I know hating on Xbox is the approved take, but Microsoft isn't going to walk away from their cut of the console market in your lifetime.
A 56 billion dollar Ponzi scheme is about to explode.
Black swan event. Buckle up folks.
I don't see a rash of bans, but I do see the same abusers of moderation given all the mod points they can use every day.
You can thank student loans for that. Earlier generations got their schooling subsidized, but now people have to get loans to pay for it themselves instead. Colleges therefore could raise tuition. Then a bipartisan effort in Congress was launched to make sure we couldn't discharge those loans through bankruptcy like you can gambling or other personal debts, which was led by Joseph R Biden. I think we know how that turned out, forgiveness for a few of the worst abused players, and blaming inability to keep his campaign promises related to partial forgiveness for all buyers blamed on Congress while he went around them to fund genocide in Gaza.
But last I read of it, it goes into a fund controlled by the President -- a slush fund, in olden terms.
Where did you read that? If it's true it would be momentous. A totally discretionary fund of $2-6B per year (based on nVidia's projections of selling $2-5B per quarter to China) would give the president enormous unchecked power.
I've spend some time searching and haven't found anything to substantiate this claim. I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'd like to see where you got the idea from.
Let me guess, competitors can now produce and market it. So now they need to stop it being sold so they can sell the next great thing at huge markup.
Yes, I'm sure than Monsanto is champing at the bit to be the next Owens-Corning and sued into oblivion, which is why they're working hard to make sure that Roundup has to be removed from the market for safety reasons.
Do you people even hear yourselves sometimes? How do you say shit like this with a straight face?
This retraction makes it easier to litigate, because expert witnesses no longer can cite this paper and have ironclad defense.
If true, that sounds like pretty dangerous ground for an alleged scientific journal to be treading upon. "Who cares if the paper is accurate or not, we're retracting to make it easier for plaintiffs' lawyers to sue" doesn't sound very scientific.
Chatbots don't know how to write proper climaxes. Multiple and repetitive, each following one losing impact until reaching the exhausting end.
Unless a suspect themselves have tested, genetic genealogy can only produce leads for further investigation. You can't be convicted, probably not even accused on your cousins DNA alone... in a state which respects basic civil rights, at least. Which it's an open question how much the US is right now.
Then again, if they don't respect basic civil rights, it's bold to assume they care about evidence at all, genetic or otherwise.
Ancestry is a PE run lobster trap, in a screw of enshittification. They are the sort of company which hikes subscription fees and "forgets" to cancel even though you tell them to. (Very profitable with their elderly customer base). If they're clamping down on police use of their databases, that's because the way they think the wind is blowing, not because of any sort of principle.
People who want to help missing person cases/cases where the police still care about actual evidence, can submit their results to the pretty open GEDmatch instead (ideally testing somewhere which doesn't have subscriptions).
Mouse input in Wayland is handled by libinput.
No.WaYlAnD iS jUsT a PrOtOcOl, remember?
"Wayland" doesn't handle the mouse input. Many compositors choose to use libinput for mouse input. This of course means that there's no standard way in Wayland to tweak things for compositors making different choices, because it's not a feature of Wayland.
The model pairs the compositor with the display server, because it makes more sense.
It does not. It's the wrong split.
99.9/100 Wayland beefs are based on ignorance and regurgitation of others' ignorance.
No. Lack of standardised method for control is a big one. I am not sure if they've fixed screen recording yet. That was a shitshow for the longest time. Also, it's been what 15 years in development, but sitting down at a freshly installed latest version ubuntu machine and I find that things like meshlab don't work out of the box in Wayland.
BuT iTs NoT wAyLaNd! WaYlAnD iS jUsT a PrOtOcOl!
Every flaw is not wayland's fault because Wayland is just a protocol. Every flaw in X11 is X11'sfault because X11 is just a protocol but that argument only works for Wayland of course.
btw- how is HDR support coming on your X11 display?
Could you remind me what the dynamic range of a standard display is in dB or unit of your choice?
At this point, the main problem is that for the last 15 years all development has gone into Wayland client development and X11 has stalled. It's kind of amazing that Wayland has a feature that X11 doesn't. Except...
With that said: xrandr is fine here, and the correct choice (the API, not the command line tool). Programs know which screen their pixels are on they are on and its DPI, and it's easy to query. Clients could choose to render, based on that query, but none of the toolkits implement it.
You'd need some mechanism to communicate to the WM to tell it you are or are not going to be responsible for scaling. That kind of thing is almost always done with properties. The WM sets one on the root window saying "scaling is going to be done", or maybe on the application windows. And the application would set a property on its window saying "I do my own scaling".
So the TL;DR is: could it? yes. Does it? No. Is it hard: no harder than Wayland.
So now I have to mail a letter in a parcel? That's kind of a waste of space, isn't it?
We'll send USPS to the grave
We'll send USPS to the grave
I hope that someone gets my
I hope that someone gets my
I hope that someone gets my letter in a parcel yeah
Letter in a parcel, yeah
- apologies to The Police
The shortest distance between two points is under construction. -- Noelie Alito