Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:18:9 (Score 1) 77

Because bigger numbers are better! Only a loser will use a 2:1 screen. Real men? they have a 10,000,000:5,000,000 ratio screen!
and it has a 330,000 uAh battery! DEAR GOD ITS HUGE! MOAR POWER!

And all you thinkers can STFU! stop your freedom hating education and knowlege from getting in the way of FREEDOM!

Comment Re:Stupid question (Score 1) 192

The article goes into some discussion about the limitations of the methodology involved, but a huge negative net worth isn't impossible. You could easily have a guy who used to have some money but then made some catastrophic bets on the stock or housing market and is now seriously under water. Or a family member may have gotten really sick and now he has typical medical debts to deal with.

Comment Re: Bloggers (Score 1) 314

If you have a corporate account, they'll happily just bill the company rather than the rider.

It is my experience that they rather bill the company and not do it via the driver. The reason is that they only need to do it once per month. That makes things easier and that cheaper (or more profit). It also means they know they get the money and not have a driver pocket it.
There are drivers who will drive with the meter off and you will pay less. They will pocket the money and the company is left with the costs. Sure, these drivers will be fired, but they still have the loss.

Comment Re:Maybe, but maybe not (Score 1) 314

Uber and AirBnB are succesfull because they are cheaper. All the rest is nice. The reason they are cheaper is because they undercut prices. Take AirBNB. It is not much harder to use than e.g.
That fact that you would not mind paying 5% more makes you the exception, not the rule.
And if you frequent 3 countries, you will need those 3 currencies as well for other things.
Sure it is nicer to have all in one app, but I would rather pay 5% less and have 5 apps.
So what do I do? I take public transport as much as possible. No app needed. I use my Debit card to take out a small amount at the airport to cover transport to the hotel and some small expenses. Not only taxi or bus, but also some coffee and/or food as not all places will accept a credit card.

Booking a hotel I do via or via the hotel directly. Most of the time it is the same price. If I take a taxi, I show them the address if they don't understand the way I talk.

Comment Re:Uber may be in trouble but no self driving cars (Score 1) 314

It depends on your milage. I already do not awn a car and use car sharing They say that if you drive less than 15.000KM (+-10.000 miles) it would become financially interesting. Obviously the more people, the cheaper it will get.
I do not need a car, because I use public transport to and from work paid for by my employer.
1) It is not 'your car', so no bragging about your car
2) You need to plan ahead and pick up your car.
3) You need to be close to a pick up point.

1) Cheaper (if you run less than 15.000KM)
2) No worry about maintenance
3) Take the car you need. Small to large is available.

With self driving cars, the disadvantage 3 will become much less closer. That means more people will be able to use it and that will bring down everything. It this moment I would say you need to drive less than 10.000, because above that, even if cheaper, the advantage of having your car in front of your house or apartment is greater than the money you make. (Obviously YMMV)

That said, it will reduce the amount of parked cars, not the amount of driving cars on the road, because people will still move around the same amount, but added to that you need to add the empty trips to pick up somebody.
Once all cars are automated, it will become more efficient.

Cars will also do more miles per year, but with lesser amount of cars. So in the beginning thgis means fewer cars, but they need to be replaces earlier due to more usage. This would mean that higher quality cars need to be made, because replace cheap cars every year will become very expensive.
I think it will be about 5-10 years to see this happen as many people still want to own a car and like to drive.

Comment Re:Uber is pursuing the wrong thing (Score 1) 314

What they want to do is transport (people) and make money by undercutting the taxi companies.
They do this by cutting out as much of the costs as possible. This can be by not needing to pay coin fees, employee fees or whatever costs they can cut. (If this is either legal or moral is another discussion)
So if they find a way to cut out even more, they will do it. In this case the human cost. Next step will be to cut out the car dealers and the car companies.

So no, the self-driving car focus is not that weird if only for just their own fleet.

I would love if the companies get an app. Even one per company would be great. But many taxi companies are small companies and then there are also many independent taxi drivers that are not linked to a company.

A company like Uber could do this. Even taking into account the different prices per meter per city and time of day and what not. But then you need to do two things:
1) See that you have enough customers that use it to make it interesting for the companies
2) See that you have enough companies that use it to make it interesting for the customers

Next you need to decide who will pay the fee. The companies? But that would mean that independent drivers might be reluctant to join as you cut into their profit.
The customers? That might open a new issue.

So the best you could do is develop software, sell it to the individual companies. Due to scale this can become expensive.

Comment Re:Sounds good to me (Score 1) 314

Here are my solutions:
If I need, I ask before what the price will be . I know this is not exact, but will indicate it. If you do a search before, you will know what to expect.
This means asking others what the expected price will be. Internet has this info available for most places.
The tipping part is valid for everything. This has nothing to do with taxis by itself. You will more likely be in more places where you might need to tip besides taxis.
So till now the trick is to be informed about the country you travel to. Wiki Travel is very helpful for this.

Yes, a decent app would be great, just like getting a pony. As not even public transport is one, it is very unlikely this will ever happen in the near future. I also do not see it as a huge issue. It is a 'nice to have' thing, not a 'must have'. And reading up on a place you visit, even if only for a business meeting, is a good thing to do.

The taxis I take in Europe are from/to the airport, if I have more than carry on. Otherwise I will take public transport as it is way cheaper and in busy cities not much slower and sometimes even faster. Again will be very helpful for almost all major cities. It will take away a lot of the uncertainty of how much you need to pay.

Comment Re:do you want $100+ oil changes at the dealer shi (Score 1) 257

Anyone that owns a performance car has been paying $100 oil changes at even a quickie lube for a while now. MY dealer oil changes are $160.00 If I buy the oil and filter myself it comes out to be $65.00 to do it in the driveway.

I'm guessing that you have not owned a car and taken it in for an oil change cince 1980? Even my Honda Civic was $70 for an oil change just yesterday at a Valvoline quick lube.

Comment Re:During the 70's or 80's... (Score 2) 257

Except you cant use Microsoft WORD to write anything that says anything negative about Microsoft.... it's in the EULA.
Oh and they own your docx files because it is in their format.
Oh and you had better read the EULA of their Visual Studio as to what they own of yours.....

Nothing has changed except that they hide it better in a wall of text written by the scummiest people on the planet. Intellectual Property Lawyers.

Comment Re:Terrible Idea (Score 1) 257

Ebay always sides with the buyer, open the case and ebay will simply refund the money paid if returning the item is too difficult. in international cases from china ebay wil even say, "here is your money, keep the item" because if the auction is marked "no returns" that means that the seller does not want it back for any reason at all even damaged so the buyer can get a refund and keep the item.

If he did not open a case with ebay then he is either very stupid or just started using ebay.

Slashdot Top Deals

The disks are getting full; purge a file today.