Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment This is how people get scammed (Score 1) 54

I'm American and Gen X. The Gen X thing is actually important. We were the original video game kids. We were the first generation to enter the work force where everybody in an office had a PC on their desk. We should be way better at tech stuff than we are. One of my high school classmates, who was a nurse by the way, almost brags that she "can't use a computer at all" and does everything tech related via her phone. This has not always worked in her favor. I have friends around my age who have no idea at all how to send money via Pay Pal, Venmo, etc. One friend who is an attorney and runs a small but reasonably successful legal practice with his wife (also an attorney), just kind of has his eyes glaze over and acts like "it's TOO hard!" if he has to click more than 2 buttons to do anything on a PC. Now if Gen X, again my generation, is like this, imagine how utterly hopeless older generation people are. My late uncle, a silent generation guy, kept creating new accounts on Facebook every time he forgot his password because that was somehow easier for him than trying to get help with the password. Sigh.

So I have a Gne X friend who got scammed a few years ago. We'll call him Adam. Adam's job is an elementary school teacher. His computers skills are very poor. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being great and 1 being terrible, I'd rate him a 2. He's a 3 at absolute best. How bad is he? Attach a USB flash drive to his PC and ask him to save a document to it. He has no understanding at all how to change directories so the document will save to a new place. He got scammed because of his poor computer skills and the fact that he doesn't do his own income taxes, which as I will explain led him to believe a false claim the scammers made and this false claim was what made the scam work.

It was during summer break from teaching and one morning his mind was distracted over some activity he had coming up in a few days. He was on his PC, probably visiting a site he really shouldn't have been on, and some pop up appeared claiming that his PC was under attack, but click on this button and we can help you save it. The distraction thing played a huge role in why he clicked on the button. He clicked on it and immediately got contacted by "Microsoft Support" and got on a phone call with the scammers. They told him some wild tale about his bank account possibly being compromised, so he gave them control over his PC and allowed them access to his online bank account. Some banks have an offer on their websites where you can "apply for a loan in minutes", so with control, the scammers did that. They did not actually get any money but the loan application got approved and that approval changed some sort of total in his account to show the addition of the loan amount. With that change, they convinced him that scammers had deposited money into his account and he would have to pay taxes on that money, so he was in big trouble. That's not how US taxes work. If things worked that way, Elon Musk and others like him could destroy their critics by making massive deposits into the critic's bank account, taking the money back, and laughing as the victim had to pay taxes on a, say, $100 million deposit that is now gone. So the scammers got him to use his bank money to buy Amazon gift cards, which he transferred to them as they assured him it would "protect" his money from a big tax bill. I think that after that they tried to get even more money from him and that finally made him suspicious and the call ended, but his bank account was drained of a little under $20,000. So these scammers pray on people with weak PC skills and little knowledge of how the US income tax system works and that's how they get suckers to give them money.

Comment Re:Wait a minute (Score 1) 69

See the thing to remember is those people is that what they accuse the other side of doing, just blind ideology.

It's just a variation of the Goebbel's playbook, which the Trump administration loves to follow - "accuse the other side of the thing you yourself are guilty of".

- Try to rig the upcoming election while yelling loudly about how the other party consistenly cheats - and without evidence, of course.
- Make up stories about how crooked the Dems are, while actively grifting yourself.

Regardless, it's nice to see Congress occasionally showing signs of having a spine, finally. It'd be great if they'd also figure out that the revenge dismantlement of NCAR is also going to cost money and lives.

I'm not even sure if it's that deliberate, or it's just the fact that Trump is thinking about rigging the election... so he talks about rigging the election.

But it's hilarious how consistent the pattern is. Normally with something like that there's just a few occasional examples. But with Trump if he says "Democrats are kicking puppies!" chances are that we're about to find out that Trump kicked a puppy.

Comment Re:The SpaceX Valuation is Insane (Score 5, Insightful) 67

SpaceX is worth more than Microsoft or Amazon at this point. It boggles the mind how much people are betting on the future just because Musk is a genius. If he gets sick the stocks craters 80% easily and this $60B is more like $12B.

He's not a genius, I sincerely think he's average to slightly below average intelligence for a software dev. Just look how clueless he really is when he pretends to be a technical guru in front of actual experts.

That doesn't mean he doesn't have some exceptional skills, but IQ isn't one of them.

First, he's hard working, at least in spurts (during critical deadlines), and he's willing to make and implement big decisions quickly. Just look at DOGE, Republicans have been trying to lay waste to the US government for decades, but Musk is the only one to actually do it. It was a complete disaster, but it wasn't ethics or common sense that stopped the previous attempts, that's a legit talent for Musk.

Second, CEOs aren't allowed to lie, but Musk has figured out that you can get around that by building a cult of personality and then making ridiculously optimistic predictions and then sell minor advancements as progress. The result is he has a core group of retail investors that buy his stocks based on vibes and refuse to sell once in. Since these retail investors prevent the stock from going down too much institutional investors also jump in on the ride. It's basically tulip bulbs.

Comment Re:that's too much money (Score 1) 74

Roku can't be worth 22 Billion. 100 million users is way-overestimated. If you're still on a Roku, buy a Shield. It's the same or at least not worse. I can't tell. At least the Shield seems to be more stable/better on Wifi.

I really don't know where your problem is coming from. I assume you're here because you're an IT guy. Me too. My Roku has worked fine for about 10 years now. Everything that connects to it is via wifi. NO ISSUES. NONE. I stream TV from Xfinity via wif ito the Roku and again - NO ISSUES. I have a more modern Roku that I use in a different part of the house, but my main TV is about 10 years old and the newer Roku can't form a stable HDMI connection with it. I'm guessing it's an old HDMI version issue with the TV, but the older one still works with the old TV so I have kept it.

Comment Re:Queue the jealousy and entitlement (Score 1) 315

Musk has risked almost every penny he has on multiple occasions.

I agree he has an extremely high risk tolerance, though that doesn't make him a good person.

He has created, commercialized or drastically improved four things (five if you count the boring company). The 1T of his wealth benefits society in the products we all consume, the environmental gains (he was the first to mass produce electric cars profitably), the jobs he has created and the taxes paid by him, his companies and his workers.

His car company is pretty small as car companies go, SpaceX means some new satellites, but Starlink is the only thing that's really making a difference to normal people. And Neuralink might help a lot of people in the future, but it largely R&D now.

His wealth doesn't come from what his companies have done. It comes from his ability as a promoter and its ridiculous effect on the stock price.

the environmental gains (he was the first to mass produce electric cars profitably),

He worked hard to get Trump re-elected, if he was in fact the tipping point, he has harmed the environment far more than he has helped.

Not to mention all the potentially hundreds of thousands of people who died due to his cuts to DOGE.

Do you see any socialists doing any of these things? This is one capitalistic person. He's done more for the environment than any green party. He's created more wealth and better jobs than all communists combined.

It sounds like this is more to do with your ideology than Elon Musk.

Comment Re:Racism. (Score 2) 229

The entire original argument for Brexit was based on racist nationalism.

They wanted to kick the foreigners out (while still letting their own elite vacation in Europe).

Humans are tribal, in modern times that tribe is usually their nation, and they care deeply about the survival of their tribe.

If immigration is seen as changing the fundamental nature of that tribe (nation) people will resist it.

We need to figure out a way to deal with that fact if we want to continue to have relatively open borders.

Comment Re:If I ruled .. (Score 4, Interesting) 229

No idea why you'd want to say "you've got to stay out for 2 decades", but certainly "you've got to actually participate in the union if you want back in" is entirely reasonable, and I say that as a Brit.

Disclaimer: I'm American, so I'm coming from an outsider's perspective. For the record, I was opposed to Brexit.

The reason the EU should insist on a minimum "stay out" time if not a "Once you leave, you NEVER get back in" approach is that you don't want asshole counties like Hungary (in the Viktor Orbán days) or the current leadership of Slovakia threatening to leave and/or cause havoc unless you buy them off. My personal opinion is that the UK should never be allowed back in to show that once you leave, you leave forever. I would make an exception for North Ireland in that if they choose to reunite with the Republic of Ireland, they should definitely be allowed to be part of the EU as part of the Republic of Ireland.

Comment Re:Holy Pre-IPO Hype, Batman! (Score 2) 56

Anthropic made Skynet? I think not.

As it happens, the Chinese are capable of making their own near-frontier models, many of which they release publicly as open weights.

It's not hype, Anthropic is literally saying there's no actual risk they're aware of.

What actually happened is they refused to let US Intelligence agencies use their models to perform illegal surveillance. So now the US government is illegally punishing them.

Comment He hacked capitalism (Score 3, Insightful) 315

The whole point of stock markets and such is that you have hard core rational investors ensuring valuations are accurate.

But Musk figured out that you don't need solid fundamentals, all you need is a hyper-loyal core following of retail investors who support you regardless of fundamentals. So you just bullshit just enough to keep them happy, without crossing too far into fraud, and the retail investors stay on board.

The retail investors create a floor for the price and their crowing about their winnings creates a bubble. The institutional investors then see what's happening and hop along for the ride.

The result is the two most overvalued companies in history (Tesla and SpaceX). In theory, the whole pile eventually comes crashing down, but just like any bubble the fund managers who buy are unlikely to be the fund managers left holding the bag.

Comment Re:Left vs right hand (Score 1) 156

I recall that this was discovered a long time ago when sales and marketing people realised that people would tend to turn right after they enter a store. I also seem to recall that this didn't hold true for left-handed people.

It would be interesting to see data from countries that are left-hand traffic. Streams of people in left-hand traffic countries tend to walk on the left side, and tend to move to the left if someone is walking towards them - which tends to be fun when walking about a right-hand traffic country! Though given these results were also tested in Japan, which is left-hand traffic, I'd expect there isn't a difference.

Would make sense, if you're right handed and turn to the right you're leading with your dominant eye (and hand) so better able to handle threats that emerge.

Similar if you choose to pass someone on the left, you present them with your stronger (right) side.

But this study supposedly found no correlation to handedness, so either something else is going on or maybe a sample size issue.

Comment Re:Oh look. (Score 1) 347

Sorry, let me clarify - the modern conceit of applying that term to the Arab (Jordanian, Syrian and Lebanese) and Egyptian people who left instead of becoming Israelis, was invented by Arafat (an Egyptian). The word Palestine was derived from Philistine, referring to the child-sacrificing enemies of the Jewish people who were famously defeated by David and ended up founding Carthage. Those people no longer exist.

It is thought that Rome renamed the region as an insult to the Jews who were driven from their land after they revolted in the first 70's. Arafat resurrected the term in order to unite the ethnically diverse "refugees" - which I put in quotes because they are not refugees, they chose to leave instead of becoming citizens because that's how much they hate the Jews.

Drop the bigotry. They left because their land was being given away by Western superpowers to a bunch of foreigners. They did exactly what any group of people would do. And they had a far better claim to that land than Jews who hadn't lived there for centuries, especially considering those Palestinians were actually descended from the ancient Israelites.

On the other hand the ethnic cleansing in the West Bank being carried out by Israeli Settlers, with the support of the Israeli government, is not typical or excusable.

Comment Re:Not really (Score 1) 347

The main difference is that these things move. That adds to the level of danger, but not to the immorality. Landmines have done the autonomous killing for about 800 years now, apparently.

The main difference is that this technology will be harder to contain. A terrorist burying a landmine in a park is plausible, but not the most practical attack.

A terrorist letting out a few of these things in a park... that is terrifying.

Comment Re:Oh look. (Score 2, Insightful) 347

70+ years of "Palestinians" (a term invented by the Egyptian Yasser Arafat) refusing to accept the existence of Israel and trying to exterminate the Jews. The dead-enders who refused to become Israeli citizens (as very many of their fellows did) and tried to eradicate Israel the day it was formed. And then again. And then again. And then again...

What a shock that the "Palestinians" were unwilling to allow a different ethnoreligious group to move into their homeland, and give them the choice of being second class citizens or expelled from their territory entirely.

Who could imagine that they would have reacted exactly the same as literally every other group of people on the planet?!?

Slashdot Top Deals

Nonsense. Space is blue and birds fly through it. -- Heisenberg

Working...